A systematic map of research characteristics in studies on augmented reality and cognitive load

COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION OPEN - Tập 2 - Trang 100036 - 2021
Josef Buchner1, Katja Buntins1, Michael Kerres1
1University of Duisburg-Essen, Learning Lab, Universitätstraße 2, 45141 Essen, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akçayır, 2017, Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature, Educ Res Rev, 20, 1, 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 Karakus, 2019, Augmented Reality Research in Education: a Bibliometric Study, Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ, 15 Arici, 2019, Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: content and bibliometric mapping analysis, Comput Educ, 142, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647 Caudell, 1992, Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes, 2, 659 Azuma, 2001, Recent advances in augmented reality, IEEE Comput Graph Appl, 21, 34, 10.1109/38.963459 Azuma, 1997, A survey of augmented reality, Teleop Virt Environ, 355, 10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 Dunleavy, 2014, Augmented reality teaching and learning, 735 Sotiriou, 2008, Visualizing the invisible: augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme, Adv Sci Lett, 1, 114, 10.1166/asl.2008.012 Dunleavy, 2014, Design principles for augmented reality learning, Techtrends Tech Trends, 58, 28, 10.1007/s11528-013-0717-2 Klopfer, 2010, Augmenting your own reality: student authoring of science-based augmented reality games, New Dir Youth Dev, 128, 85, 10.1002/yd.378 Jung, 2010, A study on software-based sensing technology for multiple object control in AR video, Sensors, 10, 9857, 10.3390/s101109857 Brito, 2018, Marker versus markerless augmented reality. which has more impact on users?, Int J Hum Comput Interact, 34, 819, 10.1080/10447318.2017.1393974 Qiao, 2019, A promising future for mobile augmented reality—state of the art, challenges, and insights, Proceed IEEE, 107, 651, 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2895105 Bottani, 2019, Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: a review of the last decade, IISE Trans, 51, 284, 10.1080/24725854.2018.1493244 Lee, 2012, Augmented reality in education and training, TechTrends, 56, 13, 10.1007/s11528-012-0559-3 Di Serio, 2013, Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course, Comput Educ, 68, 586, 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002 Giasiranis, 2017, Flow experience and educational effectiveness of teaching informatics using AR, Educ Technol Soc, 20, 78 Ibáñez, 2014, Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness, Comput Educ, 71, 1, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004 Keller, 2010 Cabero-Almenara, 2019, The motivation of technological scenarios in augmented reality (AR): results of different experiments, Appl Sci, 9, 2907, 10.3390/app9142907 Cen, 2019, Augmented immersive reality (AIR) for improved learning performance: a quantitative evaluation, IEEE Trans Learn Technol Oh, 2018, Hybrid augmented reality for participatory learning: the hidden efficacy of multi-user game-based simulation, IEEE Trans Learn Technol, 11, 115, 10.1109/TLT.2017.2750673 Sahin, 2020, The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education, Comput Educ, 144, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710 Garzón, 2019, Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains, Educ Res Rev, 27, 244, 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001 Garzón, 2019, Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings, Virtual Real, 23, 447, 10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9 Tekedere, 2016, Examining the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in education: a meta-analysis, Int J Environ Sci Educ, 11, 9469 Bujak, 2013, A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom, Comput Educ, 68, 536, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017 Dunleavy, 2009, Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning, J Sci Educ Technol, 18, 7, 10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1 Lai, 2019, An augmented reality-based learning approach to enhancing students’ science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory, Br J Educ Technol, 50, 232, 10.1111/bjet.12716 Sweller, 1988, Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning, Cogn Sci, 12, 257, 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 Sweller, 2019, Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later, Educ Psychol Rev, 31, 261, 10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5 Kalyuga, 2015, Rethinking the boundaries of cognitive load theory in complex learning, Educ Psychol Rev, 28, 831, 10.1007/s10648-015-9352-0 Kirschner, 2002, Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning, Learn Instr, 12, 1, 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7 Mayer, 2019, Thirty years of research on online learning, Appl Cogn Psychol, 33, 152, 10.1002/acp.3482 Paas, 2014, Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning, 27 Ibanez, 2016, Support for augmented reality simulation systems: the effects of scaffolding on learning outcomes and behavior patterns, IEEE Trans Learn Technol, 9, 46, 10.1109/TLT.2015.2445761 Van Merrienboer, 2014, The four-component instructional design model: multimedia principles in environments for complex learning, 104 Ibili, 2019, Effect of augmented reality environments on cognitive load: pedagogical effect, instructional design, motivation and interaction interfaces, IJPE, 15, 42, 10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.4 da Silva, 2019, Perspectives on how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: a systematic review, J Braz Comput Soc, 25, 3, 10.1186/s13173-019-0084-8 Mutlu-Bayraktar, 2019, Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: a systematic review, Comput Educ, 141, 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103618 Alexander, 2020, Methodological guidance paper: the art and science of quality systematic reviews, Rev Educ Res, 90, 6, 10.3102/0034654319854352 Murphy, 2017, Familiar paths and new directions: inaugural call for manuscripts, Rev Educ Res, 87, 3, 10.3102/0034654317691764 Newman, 2020, Systematic reviews in educational research: methodology, perspectives and application, 3 K. Petersen, R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, M. Mattsson, Systematic mapping studies in software engineering, in: 2008. https://doi.org/ 10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, International standard classification of education. fields of education and training 2013 (ISCED-F 2013) - Detailed field descriptions, Montreal QC, Canada, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15220/978-92-9189-179-5-en (accessed February 15, 2020). Mekni, 2014, Augmented reality: applications, challenges and future trends, Appl Comput Sci, 205 Alves, 2019, Comparing spatial and mobile augmented reality for guiding assembling procedures with task validation, 1 Bellucci, 2018, Investigating augmented reality support for novice users in circuit prototyping, 1 Dixon, 2012, The effect of augmented real-time image guidance on task workload during endoscopic sinus surgery, Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2, 405, 10.1002/alr.21049 Chang, 2018, Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions, Comput Educ, 125, 226, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007 Lin, 2015, Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system, Interact Learn Environ, 23, 799, 10.1080/10494820.2013.817435 Boyce, 2019, The impact of surface projection on military tactics comprehension, Milit Psychol, 31, 45, 10.1080/08995605.2018.1529487 Funk, 2016, Interactive worker assistance: comparing the effects of in-situ projection, head-mounted displays, tablet, and paper instructions, 934 Lampen, 2019, Combining simulation and augmented reality methods for enhanced worker assistance in manual assembly, 588 Yang, 2019, Influences of augmented reality assistance on performance and cognitive loads in different stages of assembly task, Front. Psychol., 10, 1703, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01703 Alrashidi, 2017, Making the invisible visible: real-time feedback for embedded computing learning activity using pedagogical virtual machine with augmented reality, 339 Loup-Escande, 2017, Contributions of mixed reality in a calligraphy learning task: effects of supplementary visual feedback and expertise on cognitive load, user experience and gestural performance, Comput Human Behav, 75, 42, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.006 Hoe, 2019, Using an augmented reality-based training system to promote spatial visualization ability for the elderly, Univ Access Inf Soc, 18, 327, 10.1007/s10209-017-0597-x Wang, 2011, Comparative effectiveness of mixed reality-based virtual environments in collaborative design, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C, 41, 284, 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2093573 Seel, 2012, Procedural knowledge, 2693 Seel, 2012, Declarative knowledge Kim, 2009, Simulated augmented reality windshield display as a cognitive mapping aid for elder driver navigation, 133 Cheng, 2017, Reading an augmented reality book: an exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes, Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 33, 53 Kucuk, 2014, Augmented reality for learning english: achievement, attitude and cognitive load levels of students, Educ. Sci., 39, 393 Hart, 1988, Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research, Adv Psychol, 52, 139, 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 G.E. Cooper, R.P. Harper, The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities., Ames Research Center, NASA 1969. NASA Technical Report TN d-5153, Moffett Field (CA), 1969. Paas, 1992, Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach, J Educ Psychol, 84, 429, 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 Paas, 1993, The efficiency of instructional conditions: an approach to combine mental effort and performance measures, Hum Fact, 35, 737, 10.1177/001872089303500412 Brünken, 2003, Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning, Educ Psychol, 38, 53, 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7 Paas, 1994, Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks, Educ Psychol Rev, 6, 351, 10.1007/BF02213420 Hart, 2006, NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later, 904 Wilson, 2011, Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (surg-tlx), World J Surg, 35, 1961, 10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4 Leppink, 2013, Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load, Behav Res Methods, 45, 1058, 10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1 Anmarkrud, 2019, Cognitive load and working memory in multimedia learning: conceptual and measurement issues, Educ Psychol, 54, 61, 10.1080/00461520.2018.1554484 Bodily, 2019, Research trends in instructional design and technology journals, Br J Educ Technol, 50, 64, 10.1111/bjet.12712 Choi, 2014, Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: towards a new model of cognitive load, Educ Psychol Rev, 26, 225, 10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6 Clark, 1983, Reconsidering research on learning from media, Rev Educ Res, 53, 445, 10.3102/00346543053004445 Clark, 2014, Ten common but questionable principles of multimedia learning, 151 R.B. Kozma, Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate, Educ Technol Res Dev. 42 (1994) 7–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02299087. Hodges, 2020, The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning, Educ Rev, 12 Surry, 2001, What's wrong with media comparison studies?, Educ Technol, 41, 32 Reeves, 2015, Reorienting educational technology research from things to problems, Learn: Res Pract, 1, 91 T.C. Reeves, E.G. Oh, The goals and methods of educational technology research over a quarter century (1989–2014), Educ Technol Res Dev. 65 (2017) 325–39. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11423-016-9474-1. S.M. Ross, G.R. Morrison, D.L. Lowther, Educational technology research past and present: balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning, (2010) 20. Ross, 1994, Delivery trucks or groceries? More food for thought on whether media (will, may, can't) influence learning, ETR&D, 42, 5 Mayer, 2020 de Jong, 2010, Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought, Instr Sci, 38, 105, 10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0 Grier, 2015, How high is high? A meta-analysis of NASA-TLX global workload scores, 59, 1727 Strzys, 2019, Smartglasses in STEM laboratory courses – the augmented thermal flux experiment Klepsch, 2017, Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load, Front Psychol, 8, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997