A survey of evolutionary policy: normative and positive dimensions

Andreoni, J. (1995). Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: The effects of positive and negative framing of cooperation in experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 60, 1–14.

Arrow, K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328–346.

Arthur, B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99, 116–131.

Azar, C., & Sandén, B. A. (2011). The elusive quest for technology neutral policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 135–139.

Baumgartner, F. R. (2006). Punctuated equilibrium theory and environmental policy. In R. Repetto (Ed.), Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 24–46). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Binmore, K. G. (2005). Natural justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Buchanan, J. (1986). Liberty, market and the state: Political economy in the 1980’s. Sussex: Wheatsheaf.

Campbell, D. T. (1969). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems, 14, 69–85.

Cantner, U., & Pyka, A. (2001). Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective. Research Policy, 30, 759–775.

Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31, 233–245.

Conway Morris, C. (2003). Life’s solution: Inevitable humans in a lonely universe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. (1994). Burying the vehicle. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(4), 616–617.

Dewey, J. (1943). The development of American pragmatism. In D. D. Runes (Ed.), Twentieth century philosophy (pp. 451–467). New York: Philosophical Library.

Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. L. (Eds.). (1988). Technical change and economic theory. New York: Pinter Publishers.

Dosi, G., Marengo, L., & Pasquali, C. (2006). How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. Research Policy, 35, 1110–1121.

Dowding, K. (2000). How not to use evolutionary theory in politics: A critique of Peter John. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2(1), 72–80.

Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovations: Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman Cooper.

Epstein, C., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.

Fagerberg, J. (2003). Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: An appraisal of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(2), 125–159.

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002). Why social preferences matter—the impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Economic Journal, 112, C1–C33.

Feldman, M. S., Khademian, A. M., Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. S. (2006). Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 89–99.

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.

Givel, M. (2006). Punctuated equilibrium in limbo: The tobacco lobby and U.S. state policy making from 1990 to 2003. Policy Studies Journal, 43(3), 405–418.

Gould, S. J. (1988). On replacing the idea of progress with an operational notion of directionality. In M. Nitecki (Ed.), Evolutionary Progress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205, 581–598.

Gowdy, J. (1994). Coevolutionary economics: The economy, society and the environment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon.

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hay, C. (1999). Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: Interrogating the process of change. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(3), 317–344.

Hahn, R. W. (1990). The political economy of environmental regulation: Towards a unifying framework. Public Choice, 65, 21–47.

Hayek, F. A. (Ed.). (1967). Notes on the evolution of systems of rules of conduct. In Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics (pp. 66–81). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hekkert, M., Suurs, R., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413–432.

Hodgson, G. M. (2004). Social Darwinism in Anglophone academic journals: A contribution to the history of the term. Journal of Historical Sociology, 17(4), 428–463.

Jacobsson, S. B., & Bergek, A. (2011). Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 41–57.

Janssen, M. A., & Jager, W. (2002). Simulating diffusion of green products: Co-evolution of firms and consumers. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 283–306.

Johansson, P. O., & Löfgren, K. G. (1985). The economics of forestry and natural resources. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

John, P. (1999). Ideas and interests; agendas and implementation: An evolutionary explanation of policy change in British local government finance. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(1), 39–62.

Kallis, G., & Norgaard, R. (2010). Coevolutionary ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 69, 690–699.

Kemp, R., Schot, J. W., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10, 175–196.

Kerber, W. (2005). Applying evolutionary economics to economic policy: The example of competitive federalism. In K. Dopfer (Ed.), Economics, evolution and the state: The governance of complexity (pp. 296–324). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Kerber, W. (2011). Competition, innovation, and maintaining diversity through competition law. In J. Drexl, W. Kerber, & R. Podszun (Eds.), Economic approaches to competition law: Foundations and limitations (pp. 173–201). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Kerr, P. (2002). Saved from extinction: Evolutionary theorising, politics and the state. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4(2), 330–358.

Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

Lewis, O., & Steinmo, S. (2010). Taking evolution seriously in political science. Theory in Biosciences, 129(2–3), 235–245.

Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.

Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39, 517–526.

Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 507–548.

Maynard Smith, J., & Szathmáry, E. (1995). The major transitions in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Metcalfe, J. S. (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. London: Routledge.

Moreau, F. (2004). The role of the state in evolutionary microeconomics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(6), 847–874.

Mulder, P., de Groot, H. L. F., & Hofkes, M. W. (2001). Economic growth and technological change: A comparison of insights from a neoclassical and an evolutionary perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68, 151–171.

Munro, A. (1997). Economics and biological evolution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 9, 429–449.

Nannen, V., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2010). Policy instruments for evolution of bounded rationality: Application to climate-energy problems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 76–93.

Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Nill, J., & Kemp, R. (2009). Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? Research Policy, 38(4), 668–680.

Norton, B., Costanza, R., & Bishop, R. C. (1998). The evolution of preferences. Why ‘sovereign’ preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it. Ecological Economics, 24, 193–211.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pelikan, P., & Wegner, G. (Eds.). (2003). The evolutionary analysis of economic policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Penn, D. J. (2003). The evolutionary roots of our environmental problems: Towards a Darwinian ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 78(3), 275–301.

Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependency, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.

Potts, J. (2000). The new evolutionary microeconomics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Ridley, M. (1995). The Red Queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. London: Penguin Books.

Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism and truth: Philosophical papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ruse, M. (1999). Mystery of mysteries: Is evolution a social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168.

Safarzynska, K., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2010). Demand-supply coevolution with multiple increasing returns: Policy analysis for unlocking and system transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 297–317.

Sartorius, C., & Zundel, S. (Eds.). (2005). Time Strategies, Innovation and Environmental Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Schneider, E. D., & Kay, J. J. (1994). Complexity and thermodynamics: Towards a new ecology. Futures, 24, 626–647.

Schot, J. W., & Geels, F. W. (2007). Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change: A critical survey of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(5), 605–622.

Schubert, C. (2012). Is novelty always a good thing? Towards an evolutionary welfare economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(3), 585–619.

Sen, A. (1993). On the Darwinian view of progress. Population and Development Review, 19(1), 123–137.

Somit, A., & Peterson, S. (1992). The dynamics of evolution. New York: Cornell University Press.

Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2007). Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(5), 521–549.

van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2008). Optimal diversity: Increasing returns versus recombinant innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(3–4), 565–580.

van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Faber, A., Idenburg, A. M., & Oosterhuis, F. H. (2006). Survival of the greenest: Evolutionary economics and policies for energy innovation. Environmental Sciences, 3(1), 57–71.

van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Stagl, S. (2003). Coevolution of economic behaviour and institutions: Towards a theory of institutional change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(3), 289–317.

van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Truffer, B., & Kallis, G. (2011). Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 1–23.

Verspagen, B. (2009). The use of modeling tools for policy in evolutionary environments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 453–461.

Ward, H. (2003). The co-evolution of regimes of accumulation and patterns of rule: State autonomy and the possibility of functional responses to crisis. New Political Economy, 8(2), 179–202.

Wegner, G. (1997). Policy from an evolutionary perspective. A new approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153, 485–509.

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wilson, D. S. (2007). Evolution for everyone: How Darwin’s theory can change the way we think about our lives. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.

Windrum, P., & Birchenhall, C. T. (2005). Structural change in the presence of network externalities: A co-evolutionary model of technological successions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15, 123–148.

Witt, U. (1992). The endogenous public choice theorist. Public Choice, 73, 117–129.

Witt, U. (Ed.). (1993). Evolutionary economics. The international library of critical writings in economics, Vol. 25. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Witt, U. (2003). Economic policy making in evolutionary perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 77–94.

Witt, U. (2011). The dynamics of consumer behavior and the transition to sustainable consumption patterns. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 101–108.

Wohlgemuth, M. (2002). Evolutionary approaches to politics. Kyklos, 55, 121–155.

Zeppini, P., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2011). Competing recombinant technologies for environmental innovation: Extending Arthur’s model of lock-in. Industry and Innovation, 18(3), 317–334.