A study of the use of concept selection methods from inside a company

Araujo C (2001) Acquisition of product development tools in industry: a theoretical contribution, PhD Thesis, MEK, Dept of Mech Eng, DTU, Denmark Araujo CS, Benedetto-Neto H, Campello AC, Segre FM, Wright IC (1996) The utilization of product development methods: a survey of UK industry. J Eng Des 7:265–277 Bender B, Blessing L (2004) On the superiority of opportunistic design strategies during early embodiment design. In: Marjanovic D (ed) Proceedings of design 2004, Dubrovnik, May 17–20. Faculty of Mechanical and Naval Architecture, Zagreb; Design Society, Glasgow, pp 117–122 Birkhofer H, Lindemann U, Albers A, Meier M (2001) Product development as a structured and interactive network of knowledge—a revolutionary approach. In: Culley SJ, Duffy A, McMahon C, Wallace K (eds) Proceedings of ICED01, Glasgow, August 21–23. Professional Engineering Publishing, UK, pp 457–464 Blessing L (2002) What is this thing called design research? In: Proceedings of 2002 int’l CIRP design seminar, Hong Kong, 16–18 May, pp 1–6 Blessing L (2003) What is this thing called design research? Keynote paper In: Folkesson A, Garén K, Norell M, Sellgren U (eds) CD-ROM proceedings of ICED03, Stockholm, Aug 19–21 Blessing L, Chakrabarti A, Wallace K (1998) Designers—the key to successful development. Springer, London Blomberg J, Giacomi J, Mosher A, Swenton-Wall P (1993) Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Shuler D, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design, principles and practice. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 123–155 Booker JD (2008) Experiences in the development and industrial implementation of design methods. Proceedings of the 6th engineering design in integrated product development EDIProD’08, 10–12 Sept 2008, Jurata, Poland, pp 145–154 Bylund N, Fredricson H, Thompson G (2002) A design process for complex mechanical structures using property based models, with application to car bodies. In: Marjanovic D (ed) Proceedings of design 2002 conference, 14–17 of May 2002, Dubrovnik, Croatia. Faculty of Mechanical and Naval Architecture, Zagreb; Design Society, Glasgow, pp 611–620 Bylund N, Grante C, López-Mesa B (2003) Usability in industry of methods from design research. In: Folkesson A, Garén K, Norell M, Sellgren U (eds) CD-ROM proceedings of ICED03, Stockholm, August 19–21 Cantamessa M (1999) Design best practices, capabilities and performance. J Eng Des 10:305–328 Dubois A, Gadde L-E (2002) Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. J Bus Res 55:553–560 Eder WE (1998) Design modeling—a design science approach (and why does industry not use it?). J Eng Des 9:355–371 Ereaut G, Imms M, Callingham M (eds) (2002) Qualitative market research: principles and practice. Sage, London Ford JD, Ford LW, Mcnamara RT (2002) Resistance and the background conversations to change. J Organ change 15(2):105–121 Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Mass, Cambridge Frey DD, Herder PM, Wijnia Y, Subrahmanian E, Katsikopoulos K, Clausing DP (2009) The Pugh controlled convergence method: model-based evaluation and implications for design theory. Res Eng Design 20(1):41–58 Frey DD, Herder PM, Wijnia Y, Subrahmanian E, Katsikopoulos K, de Neufville R, Oye K, Clausing DP (2010) Letter to the Editor, Research in engineering design: the role of mathematical Theory and empirical evidence. Res Eng Design 21(3):145–151 Frost RB (1999) Why does industry ignore design science? J Eng Des 10:301–304 Gidel T, Gautier R, Duchamp R (2005) Decision-making framework methodology: an original approach to project risk management in new product design. J Eng Des 16(1):1–23 Gill H (1990) Adoption of design science by industry—why so slow? J Eng Des 1(3):289–295 Gouvinhas R, Corbett J (1999) The use of design methods within production machinery companies. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part B. J Eng Manuf 213(3):285–293 Hazelrigg GA (1999) An axiomatic framework for engineering design. ASME J Mech Des 121:342–347 Hazelrigg GA (2010) Letter to the Editor re “The Pugh controlled convergence method: model-based evaluation and implications for design theory”. Res Eng Design 21(3):143–144 Hubka V (1980) Terminology of the Science of Design Engineering in 6 Languages. Zürich, Switzerland Hubka V, Eder WE (1996) Design science, edited for the World Wide Web by Salustri FA, Revised edition of ‘Einführung in die Konstruktionswissenschaft’, Springer-Veriag Berlin, Heidelberg 1992. Retrieved 09 Nov 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://deseng.ryerson.ca/DesignScience/ Jones CJ (1992) Design methods, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York Killander AJ (2001) Why design methodologies are difficult to implement. Int J Technol Manag 21(3/4):271–276 Kirton MJ (1994) Adaptors and innovators. Styles of creativity and problem solving, Routledge, London Kool GM, Roozenburg NFM (2005) Facilitating decision-making in pre-development. Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design ICED05, Melbourne, August 15–18, 2005, pp 176–177 Kotter JP (1995) Leading change: why transformational efforts fail. Harv Bus Rev 73(2):59–67 Lindemann U (2004) Action orientation of methods to support engineering design. Proceedings of the 4th International Seminar and Workshop EDIProD’04, 7–9 October 2004. Rydzyna, Poland, pp 45–50 López-Mesa B (2004) The use and suitability of design methods in practice. Considerations of problem-solving characteristics and the context of design. PhD thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden López-Mesa B, Thompson G (2002) The application of the 4Ps model to the management of creativity & innovation in product development. In: 9th international product development management conference, 27–28 May, Sophia Antipolis. École des Mines de Paris and European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management (EIASM), Paris, pp 587–602 Maurer R (1996) Using resistance to build support for change. J Quality Particip 19(3):56–63 Miles LD (1989) Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, 3rd edn. Eleanor Miles Walker, USA O’Connor J, Seymour J (1990) Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Psychological Skills for Understanding and Influencing People. Thorsons, London Oliver D, Kelliher T, Keegan JG Jr (1997) Engineering Complex Systems with models and objects. McGraw-Hill, New York Ozeki K, Asaka T (1990) Handbook of quality tools, The Japanese approach. Productivity Press, Cambridge Pahl G, Beitz I (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, Great Britain Pugh S (1991) Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product engineering. Adison Wesley, Wokingham Reich Y (1994) What is wrong with CAE and can it be fixed In: Proceedings of bridging the generations: an international workshop on the future directions of computer-aided engineering, Pittsburgh, US, June 18–19 1994, pp 237–242 Reich Y (2010) Editorial: is my method better? Research in engineering design. 21(3):137–142 Rohatinsky R (2001) Diagnosing the gap between methodology of engineering design and industrial practice. In: Culley SJ, Duffy A, McMahon C, Wallace K (eds) Proceedings of ICED01, Glasgow, August 21–23. Professional Engineering Publishing, UK, pp 43–51 Saari DG, Sieberg KK (2004) Are partwise comparisons reliable? Res Eng Des 15:62–71 Sickafus EN (1997) Unified Structured Inventive Thinking: How to Invent. Ntelleck, Grosse Ile Michigan Smith J, Kaufman H, Baldasare J (1984) Direct estimation considered within a comparative judgment framework. Am J Psychol 97(3):343–358 Sohal AS (1996) Assessing AMT implementations: an empirical field study. Technovation 16(8):377–444 Stempfle J, Badke-Schaub P (2002) Thinking in design teams—an analysis of team communication. Des Stud 23:473–496 Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic design: advances and applications. Oxford University Press, New York Oxford Swift KG, Brown N (2003) Implementation strategies for DFM methodologies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B. J Eng Manuf 217(6):827–833 Taguchi G, Clausing D (1990) Robust quality. Harv Bus Rev, January–February 1990, pp 65–75 Takai S, Ishii K (2004) Modifying Pugh’s design concept evaluation methods. DETC2004-57512. ASME design engineering technical conferences, Salt Lake City, UT Thompson G (1999) Improving maintainability and reliability through design. Professional Engineering Publishing, UK Van der Heijden K (1996) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester Vehar J, Miller B, Firestien R (1999) Creativity unbound. an introduction to creative problem solving. Innovation Systems Group, New York Visser W (1994) Organisation of design activities: opportunistic with hierarchical episodes. Interact Comput 6(3):235–238 Whitney DE (1988) Manufacturing by design. Harv Bus Rev, 66, July/August, pp 14–28 Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The Machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. Maxwell Macmillan International, New York Wu CFJ, Hamada M (2000) Experiments: planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization. Wiley, New York Chichester Yinn R (1994) Case study research. Design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks