A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Celik, 2012, A fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on trapezoidal numbers to material selection problem, J. Inf. Technol. Appl. Manag., 19, 19
Vaidya, 2006, Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 169, 1, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Ho, 2008, Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—a literature review, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 186, 211, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
Emrouznejad, 2008, Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA, Soc. Econ. Plan. Sci., 42, 151, 10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002
Behzadian, 2010, PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 200, 198, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
Hatami-Marbini, 2011, A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 214, 457, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.001
Zavadskas, 2011, Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 17, 397, 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291
Behzadian, 2012, A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 13051, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
Yin, 2013, Fifteen years of grey system theory research: a historical review and bibliometric analysis, Expert Syst. Appl., 40, 2767, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.11.002
Baležentis, 2014, A survey on development and applications of the multicriteria decision making method MULTIMOORA, J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., 21, 209, 10.1002/mcda.1501
Govindan, 2015, ELECTRE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res.
Kahraman, 2015, Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 8, 637, 10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325
Mardani, 2015, Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications—two decades review from 1994 to 2014, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 4126, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
Celik, 2015, A comprehensive review of multi criteria decision making approaches based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Knowl. Based Syst., 85, 329, 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.004
Yazdani, 2014, VIKOR and its applications: a state-of-the-art survey, Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci., 5, 56, 10.4018/ijsds.2014040105
Opricovic, 1998, Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems, Fac. Civ. Eng. Belgrade, 2, 5
Opricovic, 2004, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 156, 445, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Duckstein, 1980, Multiobjective optimization in river basin development, Water Resour. Res., 16, 14, 10.1029/WR016i001p00014
Yu, 1973, A class of solutions for group decision problems, Manag. Sci., 19, 936, 10.1287/mnsc.19.8.936
Opricovic, 2007, Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 178, 514, 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
Mohanty, 2014, A compromise solution by VIKOR method for ergonomically designed product with optimal set of design characteristics, Procedia Mater. Sci., 6, 633, 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.078
Girubha, 2012, Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component, Mater. Des., 37, 478, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.022
Anojkumar, 2014, Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 2964, 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.028
Chauhan, 2012, Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach, Mater. Des., 36, 1, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.021
Vats, 2013, Piezoelectric material selection for transducers under fuzzy environment, J. Adv. Ceram., 2, 141, 10.1007/s40145-013-0053-1
Çalışkan, 2013, Selection of boron based tribological hard coatings using multi-criteria decision making methods, Mater. Des., 50, 742, 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.059
Athawale, 2012, Selection of gear material using compromise ranking method, Int. J. Mater. Struct. Integr., 6, 257, 10.1504/IJMSI.2012.049959
Vats, 2014, Selection of lead-free piezoelectric ceramics, Intern. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 11, 883, 10.1111/ijac.12063
Wang, 2015, Selection of low-temperature phase change materials for thermal energy storage based on the VIKOR method, Energy Technol., 3, 84, 10.1002/ente.201402098
Maity, 2015, Tool steel material selection using PROMETHEE II method, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 78, 1537, 10.1007/s00170-014-6760-0
Lin, 2012, Combining fuzzy weight average with fuzzy inference system for material substitution selection in electric industry, Comput. Ind. Eng., 62, 1034, 10.1016/j.cie.2011.12.031
Cavallini, 2013, Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm, Mater. Des., 47, 27, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.009
Vats, 2013, Selection of ferroelectric ceramics for transducers and electrical energy storage devices, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 12, E1, 10.1111/ijac.12168
Darji, 2014, Intelligent multi criteria decision making methods for material selection in sugar industry, Procedia Mater. Sci., 5, 2585, 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.519
Çalışkan, 2013, Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods, Mater. Des., 45, 473, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.042
Bahraminasab, 2011, Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR, Mater. Des., 32, 4471, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.046
Bahraminasab, 2014, On the influence of shape and material used for the femoral component pegs in knee prostheses for reducing the problem of aseptic loosening, Mater. Des., 55, 416, 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.020
Jahan, 2012, Material selection in biomedical applications: comparing the comprehensive VIKOR and goal programming models, Int. J. Mater. Struct. Integr., 6, 230, 10.1504/IJMSI.2012.049957
Chauhan, 2014, A comparative study on decision making methods with interval data, J. Comput. Eng., 1, 10.1155/2014/793074
Chauhan, 2012, A comparative study on material selection for micro-electromechanical systems, Mater. Des., 41, 177, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.037
Yazdani, 2015, A comparative study on material selection of microelectromechanical systems electrostatic actuators using Ashby, VIKOR and TOPSIS, Mater. Des., 65, 328, 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.004
Jahan, 2010, Material selection based on ordinal data, Mater. Des., 31, 3180, 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.024
Jahan, 2011, A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection, Mater. Des., 32, 1215, 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.015
Jahan, 2012, A target-based normalization technique for materials selection, Mater. Des., 35, 647, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.005
Jahan, 2011, An aggregation technique for optimal decision-making in materials selection, Mater. Des., 32, 4918, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.05.050
Jahan, 2013, VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria, Mater. Des., 47, 759, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.072
Shanian, 2009, A methodological concept for material selection of highly sensitive components based on multiple criteria decision analysis, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 1362, 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.052
Chatterjee, 2009, Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods, Mater. Des., 30, 4043, 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.016
Chatterjee, 2011, Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods, Mater. Des., 32, 851, 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.010
Chatterjee, 2012, Material selection using preferential ranking methods, Mater. Des., 35, 384, 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.027
Rao, 2008, A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method, Mater. Des., 29, 1949, 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.019
Rao, 2010, A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection, Mater. Des., 31, 4738, 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.014
Karande, 2012, Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection, Mater. Des., 37, 317, 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.013
Athawale, 2012, Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. L: J. Mater. Des. Appl., 226, 266
Liu, 2013, Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 6325, 10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.026
Liu, 2013, Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights, Mater. Des., 52, 158, 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.054
Liu, 2014, A novel hybrid multiple criteria decision making model for material selection with target-based criteria, Mater. Des., 60, 380, 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.071
Parameshwaran, 2015, An integrated fuzzy MCDM based approach for robot selection considering objective and subjective criteria, Appl. Soft Comput., 26, 31, 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.09.025
Ic, 2013, Development of a decision support system for robot selection, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 29, 142, 10.1016/j.rcim.2012.11.008
Samantra, 2011, Selection of industrial robot using interval–valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers set combined with VIKOR method, Int. J. Technol. Intell. Plan., 7, 344, 10.1504/IJTIP.2011.045094
Chatterjee, 2010, Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 26, 483, 10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.007
Athawale, 2012, Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking method, Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng., 11, 3
Bairagi, 2014, Selection of robot for automated foundry operations using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approaches, Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag., 9, 221
Devi, 2011, Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 14163
Rao, 2011, Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences, Robot. Auton. Syst., 59, 367, 10.1016/j.robot.2011.01.005
Liu, 2014, An interval 2-tuple linguistic MCDM method for robot evaluation and selection, Int. J. Prod. Res., 52, 2867, 10.1080/00207543.2013.854939
Bairagi, 2015, A De Novo multi-approaches multi-criteria decision making technique with an application in performance evaluation of material handling device, Comput. Ind. Eng., 87, 267, 10.1016/j.cie.2015.05.015
Ghorabaee, 2015, Developing an MCDM method for robot selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
Mousavi, 2013, A hierarchical group decision-making approach for new product selection in a fuzzy environment, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 38, 3233, 10.1007/s13369-012-0430-z
Vinodh, 2013, Application of fuzzy VIKOR for concept selection in an agile environment, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 65, 825, 10.1007/s00170-012-4220-2
Vinodh, 2014, Application of fuzzy VIKOR for selection of rapid prototyping technologies in an agile environment, Rapid Prototyp. J., 20, 523, 10.1108/RPJ-07-2012-0060
Wang, 2014, Combining conjoint analysis with Kano model to optimize product varieties of smart phones: a VIKOR perspective, J. Ind. Prod. Eng., 31, 177
Büyüközkan, 2015, Evaluation of product development partners using an integrated AHP-VIKOR model, Kybernetes, 44, 220, 10.1108/K-01-2014-0019
Lin, 2011, A hybrid fuzzy DEMATEL-VIKOR method for product concept evaluation, Adv. Mater. Res., 186, 230, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.186.230
Zhu, 2015, An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number, Adv. Eng. Inform., 10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.010
Vinodh, 2014, Application of fuzzy compromise solution method for fit concept selection, Appl. Math. Model., 38, 1052, 10.1016/j.apm.2013.07.027
Fallahpour, 2012, Evaluating applicability of VIKOR method of multi-criteria decision making for parameters selection problem in rotor spinning, Fibers Polym., 13, 802, 10.1007/s12221-012-0802-8
Sahu, 2014, GDMP for CNC machine tool selection with a compromise ranking method using generalised fuzzy circumstances, Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. Technol., 7, 92, 10.1504/IJCAET.2015.066172
Ilangkumaran, 2012, Machine tool selection using AHP and VIKOR methodologies under fuzzy environment, Int. J. Model. Oper. Manag., 2, 409
Chaturvedi, 2015, Multi response optimization of process parameters of abrasive water jet machining for stainless steel AISI 304 using VIKOR approach coupled with signal to noise ratio methodology, J. Adv. Manuf. Syst., 14, 107, 10.1142/S0219686715500080
Arunachalam, 2015, Multi-criteria decision making techniques for compliant polishing tool selection, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 79, 519, 10.1007/s00170-015-6822-y
Sakthivel, 2013, Selection of best biodiesel blend for IC engines: an integrated approach with FAHP-TOPSIS and FAHP-VIKOR, Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Technol., 6, 581, 10.1504/IJOGCT.2013.056153
Vats, 2014, Selection of optimal electronic toll collection system for India: a subjective-fuzzy decision making approach, Appl. Soft Comput., 21, 444, 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.04.006
Koyee, 2015, Numerical modeling and optimization of machining duplex stainless steels, Prod. Manuf. Res., 3, 36
Ray, 2015, Optimization of process parameters of green electrical discharge machining using principal component analysis (PCA), Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
Azaryoon, 2015, An expert system based on a hybrid multi-criteria decision making method for selection of non-conventional machining processes, Appl. Mech. Mater., 735, 41, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.735.41
Ray, 2014, Cutting fluid selection for sustainable design for manufacturing: an integrated theory, Procedia Mater. Sci., 6, 450, 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.058
Liao, 2014, Evaluating and enhancing three-dimensional printing service providers for rapid prototyping using the DEMATEL based network process and VIKOR, Math. Probl. Eng.
Feng, 2013, Equilibrium design based on design thinking solving: an integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology, Adv. Mech. Eng., 10.1155/2013/125291
Zhang, 2013, Transmission system accuracy optimum allocation for multiaxis machine tools’ scheme design, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 227, 2762, 10.1177/0954406213479723
Peng, 2015, The incorporation of the Taguchi and the VIKOR methods to optimize multi-response problems in intuitionistic fuzzy environments, J. Chin. Inst. Eng., 38, 897, 10.1080/02533839.2015.1037994
Salmasnia, 2013, A robust interactive approach to optimize correlated multiple responses, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 67, 1923, 10.1007/s00170-012-4619-9
Kazemzadeh, 2012, A robust posterior method to multiresponse optimization using the VIKOR method, Adv. Mater. Res., 433, 3060, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.3060
Nezami, 2013, A sustainability approach for selecting maintenance strategy, Int. J. Sustain. Eng., 6, 332, 10.1080/19397038.2013.765928
Gauri, 2010, A study on the performance of some multi-response optimisation methods for WEDM processes, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 49, 155, 10.1007/s00170-009-2391-2
Venkata Rao, 2009, An improved compromise ranking method for evaluation of environmentally conscious manufacturing programs, Int. J. Prod. Res., 47, 4399, 10.1080/00207540701871077
Emovon, 2015, An integrated multi criteria decision making methodology using compromise solution methods for prioritising risk of marine machinery systems, Ocean Eng., 105, 92, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.005
Anvari, 2014, Application of a modified VIKOR method for decision-making problems in lean tool selection, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 71, 829, 10.1007/s00170-013-5520-x
Gauri, 2010, Comparison of performances of five prospective approaches for the multi-response optimization, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 48, 1205, 10.1007/s00170-009-2352-9
Vinodh, 2013, Compromise ranking approach for sustainable concept selection in an Indian modular switches manufacturing organization, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 64, 1709, 10.1007/s00170-012-4134-z
Jain, 2014, Evaluation of flexibility in FMS by VIKOR methodology, Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng., 18, 483
Vahdani, 2010, Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 47, 1231, 10.1007/s00170-009-2241-2
Liu, 2015, Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., 32, 763, 10.1108/IJQRM-10-2013-0169
İç, 2013, MOORA-based Taguchi optimisation for improving product or process quality, Int. J. Prod. Res., 51, 3321, 10.1080/00207543.2013.774471
Zheng, 2015, Multi-sensor target recognition using VIKOR combined with G1 method, Appl. Mech. Mater., 707, 321, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.707.321
Sun, 2014, Research on recommendation system selection based on fuzzy VIKOR with multiple distances, Appl. Mech. Mater., 598, 481, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.598.481
Mousavi, 2014, Soft computing based on a fuzzy grey group compromise solution approach with an application to the selection problem of material handling equipment, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 27, 547, 10.1080/0951192X.2013.834460
Tsai, 2011, New financial service development for banks in Taiwan based on customer needs and expectations, Serv. Ind. J., 31, 215, 10.1080/02642060903295636
Hu, 2015, Improving corporate governance effects on an enterprise crisis based on a new hybrid DEMATEL with the MADM model, J. Test. Eval., 43, 1, 10.1520/JTE20140094
Ginevičius, 2008, Evaluating the effect of state aid to business by multicriteria methods, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 9, 167, 10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.167-180
Liao, 2015, Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 23, 1343, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2360556
Tsai, 2013, Comparing the Apple iPad and non-Apple camp tablet PCs: a multicriteria decision analysis, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 19, S256, 10.3846/20294913.2013.881929
Hsieh, 2010, An efficiency and effectiveness model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan, Serv. Ind. J., 30, 2183, 10.1080/02642060903215030
Yalcin, 2012, Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 350, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.024
Safaei Ghadikolaei, 2014, Applying fuzzy MCDM for financial performance evaluation of Iranian companies, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 20, 274, 10.3846/20294913.2014.913274
Lee, 2015, Applying improved DEA & VIKOR methods to evaluate the operation performance for world's major TFT–LCD manufacturers, Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res., 32, 1, 10.1142/S0217595915500207
Ginevičius, 2006, Assessing the financial state of construction enterprises, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 12, 188, 10.3846/13928619.2006.9637740
Shaverdi, 2011, Combining fuzzy MCDM with BSC approach in performance evaluation of Iranian private banking sector, Adv. Fuzzy Syst., 10.1155/2011/148712
Rezaie, 2014, Evaluating performance of Iranian cement firms using an integrated fuzzy AHP–VIKOR method, Appl. Math. Model., 38, 5033, 10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.003
Dincer, 2013, Performance evaluation with fuzzy VIKOR and AHP method based on customer satisfaction in Turkish banking sector, Kybernetes, 42, 1072, 10.1108/K-02-2013-0021
Hsu, 2015, Using a decision-making process to evaluate efficiency and operating performance for listed semiconductor companies, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 21, 301, 10.3846/20294913.2013.876689
Chen, 2009, Assessment of service quality and benchmark performance in 3C wholesalers: forecasting satisfaction in computers, communication and consumer electronics industries, Int. J. Bus. Forecast. Mark. Intell., 1, 153
Yücenur, 2012, Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 3702, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.065
Chen, 2013, Present and future: a trend forecasting and ranking of university types for innovative development from an intellectual capital perspective, Qual. Quant., 47, 335, 10.1007/s11135-011-9521-2
Ginevičius, 2010, The model of forming competitive strategy of an enterprise under the conditions of oligopolic market, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 11, 367, 10.3846/jbem.2010.18
Lee, 2013, Merger and acquisition evaluation and decision making model, Serv. Ind. J., 33, 1473, 10.1080/02642069.2011.634905
Liu, 2013, Strategies for improving cruise product sales using hybrid ‘multiple criteria decision making’models, Serv. Ind. J., 33, 542, 10.1080/02642069.2011.614342
Lu, 2015, Evaluating the implementation of business-to-business m-commerce by SMEs based on a new hybrid MADM model, Manag. Decis., 53, 290, 10.1108/MD-01-2014-0012
Lee, 2011, Combined MCDM techniques for exploring company value based on Modigliani–Miller theorem, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 8037, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.138
Wang, 2014, Applying a hybrid MCDM model for six sigma project selection, Math. Probl. Eng.
Wang, 2012, Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 5600, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.057
Chen, 2015, Probing organization performance using a new hybrid dynamic MCDM method based on the balanced scorecard approach, J. Test. Eval., 43, 1, 10.1520/JTE20130181
Fu, 2011, Using fuzzy AHP and VIKOR for benchmarking analysis in the hotel industry, Serv. Ind. J., 31, 2373, 10.1080/02642069.2010.503874
Yeh, 2015, Measuring brand equity of cosmetic chain stores by hybrid multiple criteria decision making methods, Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag., 21, 27
Bhosale, 2014, Selection of best knowledge flow practicing organisation using hybrid fuzzy AHP-VIKOR method, Int. J. Decis. Sci. Risk Manag., 5, 234
Fu, 2014, The critical success factors affecting the adoption of inter-organization systems by SMEs, J. Bus. Ind. Mark., 29, 400, 10.1108/JBIM-04-2012-0070
Liu, 2010, The evaluation of the baoding industrial clusters competitiveness based on VIKOR, Adv. Mater. Res., 108, 1015, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.108-111.1015
Krivka, 2014, Complex evaluation of the economic crisis impact on Lithuanian industries, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 15, 299, 10.3846/16111699.2013.867277
Ginevičius, 2004, Complex evaluation of the use of information technologies in the countries of Eastern and Central Europe, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 5, 183, 10.3846/16111699.2004.9636082
Chu, 2007, Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis, Expert Syst. Appl., 33, 1011, 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.026
Fallah, 2013, Malmquist productivity index by extended VIKOR method using interval numbers, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 10.1155/2013/824316
Rostamzadeh, 2014, Multi criteria decision making for assisting business angels in investments, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 20, 696, 10.3846/20294913.2014.984364
Liu, 2012, A competency evaluation method of human resources managers based on multi-granularity linguistic variables and VIKOR method, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 18, 696, 10.3846/20294913.2012.753169
Kabir, 2014, Consultant selection for quality management using VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, Int. J. Multicriteria Decis. Mak., 4, 96, 10.1504/IJMCDM.2014.060423
Wan, 2013, The extended VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Knowl. Based Syst., 52, 65, 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.06.019
Cevikcan, 2009, Fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy axiomatic design versus to fuzzy TOPSİS: an application of candidate assessment, J. Mult. Valued Log. Soft Comput., 15, 181
Liu, 2015, Personnel selection using interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method, Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind., 25, 370, 10.1002/hfm.20553
Tan, 2013, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multicriteria group decision making based on VIKOR and Choquet integral, J. Appl. Math., 10.1155/2013/656879
Hajiagha, 2014, Fuzzy multi-objective linear programming based on compromise VIKOR method, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 13, 679, 10.1142/S0219622014500667
Rostamzadeh, 2014, An application of a hybrid MCDM method for the evaluation of entrepreneurial intensity among the SMEs: a case study, Sci. World J., 10.1155/2014/703650
Qin, 2015, An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment, Knowl. Based Syst., 86, 116, 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.025
Tadić, 2014, A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 8112, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.021
Sasikumar, 2011, Integration of closed loop distribution supply chain network and 3PRLP selection for the case of battery recycling, Int. J. Prod. Res., 49, 3363, 10.1080/00207541003794876
Rostamzadeh, 2015, Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices, Ecol. Indic., 49, 188, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.045
Tzeng, 2002, Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 21, 171, 10.1016/S0278-4319(02)00005-1
Su, 2011, A hybrid fuzzy approach to fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 10, 695, 10.1142/S021962201100452X
Zandi, 2013, Extension of fuzzy ELECTRE based on VIKOR method, Comput. Ind. Eng., 66, 258, 10.1016/j.cie.2013.06.011
Bashiri, 2013, Modeling fuzzy capacitated p-hub center problem and a genetic algorithm solution, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 3513, 10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.018
Milosevic, 2013, The application of a multi-parameter analysis in choosing the location of a new solid waste landfill in Serbia, Waste Manag. Res., 10.1177/0734242X13497076
Lee, 2014, A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR for the selection of location—real estate brokerage services, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 13, 197, 10.1142/S0219622014500333
Mokhtarian, 2014, A new flexible and reliable interval valued fuzzy VIKOR method based on uncertainty risk reduction in decision making process: an application for determining a suitable location for digging some pits for municipal wet waste landfill, Comput. Ind. Eng., 78, 213, 10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.008
Çebi, 2015, Multi-criteria and multi-stage facility location selection under interval type-2 fuzzy environment: a case study for a cement factory, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 8, 330, 10.1080/18756891.2015.1001956
Tosun, 2015, A fuzzy TODIM approach for the supplier selection problem, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 8, 317, 10.1080/18756891.2015.1001954
Alimardani, 2013, A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 19, 533, 10.3846/20294913.2013.814606
Parthiban, 2009, Development and assessment of modified VIKOR method for multi-criteria single sourcing in supply chain, Int. J. Bus. Syst. Res., 4, 94, 10.1504/IJBSR.2010.029950
Leng, 2014, Implementing of a three-phase integrated decision support model for parts machining outsourcing, Int. J. Prod. Res., 52, 3614, 10.1080/00207543.2013.879344
Mohammady, 2011, Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection in an agile and modular virtual enterprise, Fuzzy Inf. Eng., 3, 411, 10.1007/s12543-011-0095-4
Mishra, 2012, Multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) for supplier selection using fuzzy linguistic modelling integrated with VIKOR method, Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag., 12, 67
Chen, 2009, Optimizing partners’ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: the strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 120, 233, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.022
Ayazi, 2014, Supplier selection and order size determination in a supply chain by using fuzzy multiple objective models, J. Mult. Valued Log. Soft Comput., 23, 135
Mukherjee, 2013, Supplier selection by F-compromise method: a case study of cement industry of NE India, Int. J. Comput. Syst. Eng., 1, 162, 10.1504/IJCSYSE.2013.052586
Aghdaie, 2014, Synergies of data mining and multiple attribute decision making, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 110, 767, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.921
Wu, 2011, The supplier selection application based on two methods: VIKOR algorithm with entropy method and fuzzy TOPSIS with vague sets method, Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag., 6, 109
Hsu, 2012, The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 66, 95, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.02.009
Datta, 2012, Green supplier evaluation and selection using VIKOR method embedded in fuzzy expert system with interval-valued fuzzy numbers, Int. J. Procure. Manag., 5, 647, 10.1504/IJPM.2012.048880
Akman, 2014, Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy C-means and VIKOR methods, Comput. Ind. Eng., 86, 69, 10.1016/j.cie.2014.10.013
Peng, 2013, A hybrid dynamic MADM model for problem-improvement in economics and business, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 19, 638, 10.3846/20294913.2013.837114
Liou, 2010, Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 3755, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.048
Alkhatib, 2015, A novel technique for evaluating and selecting logistics service providers based on the logistics resource view, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 6976, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.010
Kumar, 2012, An approach to analyze logistic outsourcing problem in medium-scale organization by CFPR and VIKOR, J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., 23, 885, 10.1108/17410381211267718
Büyüközkan, 2008, Evaluation of suppliers’ environmental management performances by a fuzzy compromise ranking technique, J. Mult. Valued Log. Soft Comput., 14, 309
Sanayei, 2010, Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 24, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063
You, 2015, Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic information, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 1906, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.004
Wang, 2014, Multi-criteria decision-making method based on normal intuitionistic fuzzy-induced generalized aggregation operator, TOP, 22, 1103, 10.1007/s11750-014-0314-3
Lu, 2011, Research on evaluation of auto parts suppliers by VIKOR method based on intuitionistic language multi-criteria, Key Eng. Mater., 467, 31, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.467-469.31
Jiang, 2013, Supplier selection based on FAHP-VIKOR-IVIFs, Appl. Mech. Mater., 357, 2703
Shemshadi, 2011, A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 12160, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.027
Geng, 2014, A hybrid service supplier selection approach based on variable precision rough set and VIKOR for developing product service system, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 28, 1063
Hsu, 2014, A multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers in the electronics industry, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 11, 775, 10.1007/s13762-013-0265-5
Tzeng, 2012, Combined DEMATEL technique with hybrid MCDM methods for creating the aspired intelligent global manufacturing & logistics systems, Ann. Oper. Res., 197, 159, 10.1007/s10479-010-0829-4
Samantra, 2013, Decision-making in selecting reverse logistics alternative using interval-valued fuzzy sets combined with VIKOR approach, Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag., 14, 175
Fu, 2015, Key factors for the adoption of RFID in the logistics industry in Taiwan, Int. J. Logist. Manag., 26, 61, 10.1108/IJLM-09-2012-0091
Chithambaranathan, 2015, Service supply chain environmental performance evaluation using grey based hybrid MCDM approach, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 166, 163, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.002
Pamučar, 2015, The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 3016, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
Sarrafha, 2015, A bi-objective integrated procurement, production, and distribution problem of a multi-echelon supply chain network design: a new tuned MOEA, Comput. Oper. Res., 54, 35, 10.1016/j.cor.2014.08.010
Chen, 2015, Application of a hybrid dynamic MCDM to explore the key factors for the internal control of procurement circulation, Int. J. Prod. Res., 53, 2951, 10.1080/00207543.2014.961210
Opricovic, 2009, A compromise solution in water resources planning, Water Resour. Manag., 23, 1549, 10.1007/s11269-008-9340-y
Chang, 2013, Evaluation of basin environmental vulnerability: the weighted method compared to the compromise method, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 10, 1051, 10.1007/s13762-013-0234-z
Kim, 2013, Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 9419, 10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.040
Chang, 2014, Using the VIKOR method to evaluate the design of a water quality monitoring network in a watershed, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 11, 303, 10.1007/s13762-013-0195-2
Hashemi, 2014, An extended compromise ratio model with an application to reservoir flood control operation under an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Appl. Math. Model., 38, 3495, 10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.045
Opricovic, 2000, Multicriteria scheduling in water resources engineering using genetic algorithm, Comput. Civ. Build. Eng., 1434, 10.1061/40513(279)187
Chang, 2009, Multi-criteria analysis via the VIKOR method for prioritizing land-use restraint strategies in the Tseng-Wen reservoir watershed, J. Environ. Manag., 90, 3226, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.020
Chang, 2011, Applying a modified VIKOR method to classify land subdivisions according to watershed vulnerability, Water Resour. Manag., 25, 301, 10.1007/s11269-010-9700-2
Chitsaz, 2015, Comparison of different multi criteria decision-making models in prioritizing flood management alternatives, Water Resour. Manag., 29, 2503, 10.1007/s11269-015-0954-6
Sabzi, 2015, Numerical comparison of multi-criteria decision-making techniques: a simulation of flood management multi-criteria systems, World Environ. Water Resour. Congr., 359
Kim, 2015, Prioritizing alternatives in strategic environmental assessment (SEA) using VIKOR method with random sampling for data gaps, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 8550, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.010
Opricovic, 2011, Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 12983, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097
Tscheikner-Gratl, 2015, Integrated rehabilitation management by prioritization of rehabilitation areas for small and medium sized municipalities, World Environ. Water Resour. Congr., 2045
Kim, 2015, Robust prioritization of climate change adaptation strategies using the vikor method with objective weights, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 51, 1167, 10.1111/jawr.12291
Liu, 2015, Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 41, 932, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.061
Martin-Utrillas, 2015, Hybrid method for selection of the optimal process of leachate treatment in waste treatment and valorization plants or landfills, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 17, 873, 10.1007/s10098-014-0834-4
Liu, 2014, Site selection in municipal solid waste management with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, Environ. Earth Sci., 72, 4179, 10.1007/s12665-014-3314-6
Liu, 2014, Site selection in waste management by the VIKOR method using linguistic assessment, Appl. Soft Comput., 21, 453, 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.04.004
Kabir, 2015, Selection of hazardous industrial waste transportation firm using extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, Int. J. Data Anal. Tech. Strateg., 7, 40, 10.1504/IJDATS.2015.067700
Liu, 2013, Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method, Waste Manag., 33, 2744, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.006
Opricovic, 2003, Fuzzy multicriteria model for postearthquake land-use planning, Nat. Hazards Rev., 4, 59, 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:2(59)
Opricovic, 2002, Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 17, 211, 10.1111/1467-8667.00269
Pricovic, 2002, Multi-criteria model for post-earthquake land-use planning, Environ. Manag. Health, 13, 9, 10.1108/09566160210417796
Hudej, 2013, Multi-variable selection of the main mine shaft location, J. Min. Sci., 49, 950, 10.1134/S1062739149060154
Azimi, 2011, Evaluating the strategies of the Iranian mining sector using an integrated model, Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag., 6, 459
Kaya, 2011, Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 7326, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.003
Hashemi, 2013, A compromise ratio method with an application to water resources management: an intuitionistic fuzzy set, Water Resour. Manag., 27, 2029, 10.1007/s11269-013-0271-x
Peng, 2012, Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods, Ann. Oper. Res., 234, 95, 10.1007/s10479-012-1253-8
Ebrahimnejad, 2012, A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment, Appl. Math. Model., 36, 4197, 10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.050
Mohammadi, 2014, A hybrid quality function deployment and cybernetic analytic network process model for project manager selection, J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 20, 795, 10.3846/13923730.2014.945952
San Cristóbal, 2011, Contractor selection using multicriteria decision-making methods, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 138, 751, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000488
Vahdani, 2013, A new compromise solution method for fuzzy group decision-making problems with an application to the contractor selection, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 26, 779, 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.11.005
Ginevičius, 2008, Evaluating the alternative solutions of wall insulation by multicriteria methods, J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 14, 217, 10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.20
Antucheviciene, 2011, Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods, Informatica, 22, 319, 10.15388/Informatica.2011.329
Zavadskas, 2004, Evaluation of buildings’ redevelopment alternatives with an emphasis on the multipartite sustainability, Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag., 8, 121, 10.3846/1648715X.2004.9637512
Antucheviciene, 2008, Modelling multidimensional redevelopment of derelict buildings, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 35, 331, 10.1504/IJEP.2008.021364
Formisano, 2015, On the selection by MCDM methods of the optimal system for seismic retrofitting and vertical addition of existing buildings, Comput. Struct., 159, 1, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.06.016
Kosoric, 2011, Testing a design methodology for building integration of photovoltaics (PV) using a PV demonstration site in Singapore, Archit. Sci. Rev., 54, 192, 10.1080/00038628.2011.590052
Mela, 2012, Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design, Adv. Eng. Inform., 26, 716, 10.1016/j.aei.2012.03.001
Martin-Utrillas, 2015, Optimal infrastructure selection to boost regional sustainable economy, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 22, 30
Caterino, 2009, Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision making methods for seismic structural retrofitting, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 24, 432, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00599.x
Zolfani, 2013, Developing a new hybrid MCDM method for selection of the optimal alternative of mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants during automobile accidents, Transport, 28, 89, 10.3846/16484142.2013.782567
Vučijak, 2015, Use of multi-criteria decision aid methods for selection of the best alternative for the highway tunnel doors, Procedia Eng., 100, 656, 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.417
Mandal, 2015, Human error identification and risk prioritization in overhead crane operations using HTA, SHERPA and fuzzy VIKOR method, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 7195, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.033
Safari, 2014, Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR, J. Intell. Manuf., 1
Mousavi, 2013, A fuzzy stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making approach for selection problems, Group Decis. Negot., 22, 207, 10.1007/s10726-011-9259-1
Ahmadi, 2010, Selection of maintenance strategy for aircraft systems using multi-criteria decision making methodologies, Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng., 17, 223, 10.1142/S0218539310003779
Tošić, 2015, Multicriteria optimization of natural and recycled aggregate concrete for structural use, J. Clean. Prod., 87, 766, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.070
Liou, 2011, A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality, J. Air Transp. Manag., 17, 57, 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.03.004
Kuo, 2011, Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 1304, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.003
Kuo, 2011, A novel interval-valued fuzzy MCDM method for improving airlines’ service quality in Chinese cross-strait airlines, Transp. Res. E: Logist. Transp. Rev., 47, 1177, 10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.007
Kuo, 2012, A soft computing method of performance evaluation with MCDM based on interval-valued fuzzy numbers, Appl. Soft Comput., 12, 476, 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.020
Liao, 2013, A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak., 12, 373, 10.1007/s10700-013-9162-0
Celik, 2014, A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: a real case study for Istanbul Turkey, Transp. Policy, 36, 283, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.005
Tzeng, 2005, Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation, Energy Policy, 33, 1373, 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014
Aydın, 2014, Vehicle selection for public transportation using an integrated multi criteria decision making approach: a case of Ankara, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 26, 2467, 10.3233/IFS-130917
Liu, 2013, Improving metro–airport connection service for tourism development: using hybrid MCDM models, Tour. Manag. Perspect., 6, 95, 10.1016/j.tmp.2012.09.004
Büyüközkan, 2008, Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach, Math. Comput. Simul., 77, 464, 10.1016/j.matcom.2007.11.015
Büyüközkan, 2011, Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of knowledge management tools, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 4, 184, 10.1080/18756891.2011.9727775
Liao, 2015, Approaches to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information based on the cosine distance and similarity measures for HFLTSs and their application in qualitative decision making, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 5328, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.017
Mehbodniya, 2013, A fuzzy extension of VIKOR for target network selection in heterogeneous wireless environments, Phys. Commun., 7, 145, 10.1016/j.phycom.2013.02.002
Hu, 2015, Improving mobile commerce adoption using a new hybrid fuzzy MADM model, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 5
Chou, 2012, A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating website quality of professional accounting firms, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 2783, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.138
Chang, 2015, A hybrid fuzzy model for selecting and evaluating the e-book business model: a case study on Taiwan e-book firms, Appl. Soft Comput., 34, 194, 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.011
Chiu, 2013, A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business, Knowl. Based Syst., 37, 48, 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.06.017
Tsai, 2011, An effectiveness evaluation model for the web-based marketing of the airline industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 15499
Tsai, 2010, An effective evaluation model and improvement analysis for national park websites: a case study of Taiwan, Tour. Manag., 31, 936, 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.01.016
Burmaoglu, 2012, E-government website evaluation with hybrid MCDM method in fuzzy environment, Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci., 5, 163
Wu, 2014, Electronic service quality of Facebook social commerce and collaborative learning, Comput. Hum. Behav., 51, 1395, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.001
Büyüközkan, 2007, Evaluating e-learning web site quality in a fuzzy environment, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 22, 567, 10.1002/int.20214
Chen, 2015, Evaluating the enhancement of corporate social responsibility websites quality based on a new hybrid MADM model, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 14, 697, 10.1142/S0219622015500121
Lu, 2014, Exploring mobile banking services for user behavior in intention adoption: using new hybrid MADM model, Serv. Bus., 9, 541, 10.1007/s11628-014-0239-9
Ou Yang, 2009, A VIKOR-based multiple criteria decision method for improving information security risk, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 8, 267, 10.1142/S0219622009003375
Nakhoda, 2015, Expanding a change management framework for Iranian information services centers: applying fuzzy MADM techniques, J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci., 1
Kang, 2014, Review-based measurement of customer satisfaction in mobile service: sentiment analysis and VIKOR approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 1041, 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.101
Lin, 2015, A novel hybrid decision-making model for determining product position under consideration of dependence and feedback, Appl. Math. Model., 39, 2194, 10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.033
Hu, 2014, Exploring smart phone improvements based on a hybrid MCDM model, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 4401, 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.052
Yang, 2013, A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment, Inf. Sci., 232, 482, 10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.012
Salman, 2015, A self‐configured link adaptation for green LTE downlink transmission, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., 26, 258, 10.1002/ett.2820
Chen, 2010, Aviatic innovation system construction using a hybrid fuzzy MCDM model, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 8387, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.043
Azad, 2014, Energy efficient clustered scheme for wireless sensor networks using multi-criteria decision making approach, Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. Technol., 6, 324, 10.1504/IJCAET.2014.063113
Kou, 2012, Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 11, 197, 10.1142/S0219622012500095
Kou, 2014, Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods, Inf. Sci., 275, 1, 10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.137
Hung, 2011, Knowledge management adoption and assessment for SMEs by a novel MCDM approach, Decis. Support Syst., 51, 270, 10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.021
Tsai, 2014, A combined evaluation model for encouraging entrepreneurship policies, Ann. Oper. Res., 221, 449, 10.1007/s10479-011-1029-6
Mazdeh, 2013, An empirical investigation of entrepreneurship intensity in Iranian state universities, High. Educ., 65, 207, 10.1007/s10734-012-9539-y
Su, 2015, Cloud e-learning service strategies for improving e-learning innovation performance in a fuzzy environment by using a new hybrid fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making model, Interact. Learn. Environ., 1
Pekkaya, 2015, Career preference of university students: an application of MCDM methods, Procedia Econ. Finance, 23, 249, 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00486-4
Fu, 2013, Combining multicriteria decision making tools to identify critical success factors that affect the performance of training course projects, Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., 32, 388, 10.1002/sres.2249
Chen, 2011, Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 12168, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.050
Ranjan, 2014, Evaluating performance of engineering departments in an Indian University using DEMATEL and compromise ranking methods, OPSEARCH, 52, 307, 10.1007/s12597-014-0186-1
Wu, 2010, Innovation capital indicator assessment of Taiwanese Universities: a hybrid fuzzy model application, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 1635, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.045
Wu, 2011, Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard, Eval. Program Plan., 34, 37, 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.001
Zolfani, 2013, Performance evaluation of private universities based on balanced scorecard: empirical study based on Iran, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 14, 696, 10.3846/16111699.2012.665383
Park, 2013, Extension of the VIKOR method to dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Comput. Math. Appl., 65, 731, 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.12.008
Chen, 2012, Creative-oriented personality, creativity improvement, and innovation level enhancement, Qual. Quant., 46, 1625, 10.1007/s11135-011-9471-8
Chen, 2012, Creativity strategy selection for the higher education system, Qual. Quant., 46, 739, 10.1007/s11135-010-9411-z
Wu, 2012, Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model, Measurement, 45, 856, 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.02.009
Liu, 2012, Improving tourism policy implementation–the use of hybrid MCDM models, Tour. Manag., 33, 413, 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.05.002
Chou, 2014, An integrate method for performance of women in science and technology based on entropy measure for objective weighting, Qual. Quant., 48, 157, 10.1007/s11135-012-9756-6
Kaya, 2010, Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul, Energy, 35, 2517, 10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051
San Cristóbal, 2011, Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method, Renew. Energy, 36, 498, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031
Dai, 2012, Multi-criteria renewable energy planning decision-making model based on VIKOR, Adv. Mater. Res., 512, 1174, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.512-515.1174
Quijano H, 2012, MODERGIS application: Integrated simulation platform to promote and develop renewable sustainable energy plans, Colombian case study, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 16, 5176, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.006
Yazdani-Chamzini, 2013, Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision making, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 14, 957, 10.3846/16111699.2013.766257
Sharma, 2015, Selection of India’s energy resources: a fuzzy decision making approach, Energy Syst., 1
Vučijak, 2013, Applicability of multicriteria decision aid to sustainable hydropower, Appl. Energy, 101, 261, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.024
Sakthivel, 2015, A hybrid multi-criteria decision modeling approach for the best biodiesel blend selection based on ANP-TOPSIS analysis, Ain Shams Eng. J., 6, 239, 10.1016/j.asej.2014.08.003
Ebrahimnejad, 2014, Risk ranking in mega projects by fuzzy compromise approach: a comparative analysis, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.: Appl. Eng. Technol., 26, 949, 10.3233/IFS-130785
Golić, 2011, General model of solar water heating system integration in residential building refurbishment—potential energy savings and environmental impact, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15, 1533, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.052
Furundzic, 2012, Potential for reduction of CO2 emissions by integration of solar water heating systems on student dormitories through building refurbishment, Sustain. Cities Soc., 2, 50, 10.1016/j.scs.2011.10.005
Civic, 2014, Multi-criteria optimization of insulation options for warmth of buildings to increase energy efficiency, Procedia Eng., 69, 911, 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.070
Ray, 2014, Multi-objective optimization of green EDM: an integrated theory, J. Inst. Eng. (India): Ser. C, 96, 41
Baležentis, 2012, An integrated assessment of Lithuanian economic sectors based on financial ratios and fuzzy MCDM methods, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 18, 34, 10.3846/20294913.2012.656151
Ho, 2011, Combined DEMATEL technique with a novel MCDM model for exploring portfolio selection based on CAPM, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 16, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.058
Shen, 2014, Combining VIKOR-DANP model for glamor stock selection and stock performance improvement, Knowl. Based Syst., 58, 86, 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.07.023
Shen, 2014, A decision rule-based soft computing model for supporting financial performance improvement of the banking industry, Soft Comput., 19, 859, 10.1007/s00500-014-1413-7
Wu, 2009, A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 10135, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.005
Afful-Dadzie, 2014, A fuzzy TOPSIS framework for selecting fragile states for support facility, Qual. Quant., 1
Chang, 2015, A hybrid financial performance evaluation model for wealth management banks following the global financial crisis, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 1
Hsu, 2014, A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model for investment decision making, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 15, 509, 10.3846/16111699.2012.722563
Lin, 2009, A study on the relationship between related party transactions and monthly sales in Taiwan's publicly issued companies, J. Chin. Inst. Ind. Eng., 26, 337
Peng, 2011, An empirical study of classification algorithm evaluation for financial risk prediction, Appl. Soft Comput., 11, 2906, 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.11.028
Lee, 2013, Valuation and choice of convertible bonds based on MCDM, Appl. Financ. Econ., 23, 861, 10.1080/09603107.2013.770122
Hsu, 2013, Incorporating support vector machines with multiple criteria decision making for financial crisis analysis, Qual. Quant., 47, 3481, 10.1007/s11135-012-9735-y
Chang, 2014, Fuzzy VIKOR method: a case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan, Inf. Sci., 271, 196, 10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.118
Lu, 2013, Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model, Decis. Support Syst., 56, 259, 10.1016/j.dss.2013.06.006
Zeng, 2013, VIKOR method with enhanced accuracy for multiple criteria decision making in healthcare management, J. Med. Syst., 37, 1, 10.1007/s10916-012-9908-1
Liu, 2012, Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 12926, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
Liu, 2014, Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach, J. Intell. Manuf., 1, 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.07.002
Liu, 2015, A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method, Appl. Soft Comput., 28, 579, 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.036
Ren, 2015, Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 20, 842, 10.1007/s11367-015-0877-8
Salmasnia, 2013, A robust posterior preference decision-making approach to multiple response process design, Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci., 6, 186
Vats, 2014, Selection of optimal sintering temperature of K0.5Na0.5NbO3 ceramics for electromechanical applications, J. Asian Ceram. Soc., 2, 5, 10.1016/j.jascer.2013.12.002
Tong, 2007, Optimization of multi-response processes using the VIKOR method, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 31, 1049, 10.1007/s00170-005-0284-6
Aktan, 2013, Agricultural performance evaluation by integrating fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods, Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci., 6, 324
Hsu, 2015, A fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making system for analyzing gaps of service quality, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 17, 256, 10.1007/s40815-015-0018-3
Pourebrahim, 2014, Application of VIKOR and fuzzy AHP for conservation priority assessment in coastal areas: case of Khuzestan district, Iran, Ocean Coast. Manag., 98, 20, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.009
Bazzazi, 2011, Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: application of modified VIKOR method, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 2550, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.043
Vahdani, 2012, Soft computing based on interval valued fuzzy ANP-A novel methodology, J. Intell. Manuf., 23, 1529, 10.1007/s10845-010-0457-5
Ashtiani, 2014, Trust modeling based on a combination of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy VIKOR, Soft Comput., 1
Fallahpour, 2013, Spinning preparation parameters selection for rotor spun knitted fabric using VIKOR method of multicriteria decision-making, J. Text. Inst., 104, 7, 10.1080/00405000.2012.692939
Opricovic, 2007, A fuzzy compromise solution for multicriteria problems, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst., 15, 363, 10.1142/S0218488507004728
Chang, 2010, A modified VIKOR method for multiple criteria analysis, Environ. Monit. Assess., 168, 339, 10.1007/s10661-009-1117-0
Li, 2014, A multi-risks group evaluation method for the informatization project under linguistic environment, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.: Appl. Eng. Technol., 26, 1581, 10.3233/IFS-131095
Wei, 2014, A multiple criteria hesitant fuzzy decision making with Shapley value-based VIKOR method, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.: Appl. Eng. Technol., 26, 1065, 10.3233/IFS-130798
Park, 2011, Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak., 10, 233, 10.1007/s10700-011-9102-9
Zhang, 2013, Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 4938, 10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.002
Sayadi, 2009, Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers, Appl. Math. Model., 33, 2257, 10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002
Xu, 2014, Extension of VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with ıncomplete weights, Appl. Mech. Mater., 513, 721, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.513-517.721
Xu, 2014, Extension of VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights, Appl. Mech. Mater., 513, 725, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.513-517.725
Li, 2009, Relative ratio method for multiple attribute decision making problems, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 8, 289, 10.1142/S0219622009003405
Li, 2015, Stochastic interval-grey number VIKOR method based on prospect theory, Grey Syst.: Theory Appl., 5, 105, 10.1108/GS-12-2014-0055
Yazici, 2015, VIKOR method using interval type two fuzzy sets, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 29, 411, 10.3233/IFS-151607
Pai, 2014, Applying linguistic information and intersection concept to improve effectiveness of multi-criteria decision analysis technology, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 13, 291, 10.1142/S0219622014500436
Kosareva, 2013, Comparison of accuracy in ranking alternatives performing generalized fuzzy average functions, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 19, 162, 10.3846/20294913.2012.763072
Zhao, 2013, Extended VIKOR method based on cross-entropy for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.: Appl. Eng. Technol., 25, 1053, 10.3233/IFS-130790
Heydari, 2010, Extended VIKOR as a new method for solving Multiple Objective Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming problems, RAIRO: Oper. Res., 44, 139, 10.1051/ro/2010011
Ju, 2013, Extension of VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 3112, 10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.035
Peng, 2011, FAMCDM: A fusion approach of MCDM methods to rank multiclass classification algorithms, Omega, 39, 677, 10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.009
Peng, 2013, Similarity-based method for multiresponse optimization problems with intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B: J. Eng. Manuf., 227, 908, 10.1177/0954405412473877
Ginevicius, 2007, Some problems of evaluating multicriteria decision methods, Int. J. Manag. Decis. Mak., 8, 527
Sun, 2015, Hybrid multiple attribute group decision-making for power system restoration, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 6795, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.05.001