A social interaction field model accurately identifies static and dynamic social groupings

Nature Human Behaviour - Tập 3 Số 8 - Trang 847-855
Chen Zhou1, Ming Han1, Qi Liang1, Yi-Fei Hu1, Shu‐Guang Kuai1
1Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (Ministry of Education and Shanghai), Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Gallup, A. C. et al. Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7245–7250 (2012).

Henderson, J. M. & Hollingworth, A. High-level scene perception. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 243–271 (1999).

Fletcher-Watson, S., Findlay, J. M., Leekam, S. R. & Benson, V. Rapid detection of person information in a naturalistic scene. Perception 37, 571–583 (2008).

De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E. & Gallagher, S. Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 441–447 (2010).

Kendon, A. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

Wagemans, J. et al. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychol. Bull. 138, 1172–1217 (2012).

Wagemans, J. et al. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychol. Bull. 138, 1218–1252 (2012).

Field, D. J., Hayes, A. & Hess, R. F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local “association field”.Vis. Res. 33, 173–193 (1993).

Kubovy, M. & Wagemans, J. Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices. Psychol. Sci. 6, 225–234 (1995).

Grossberg, S. & Pessoa, L. Texture segregation, surface representation and figure−ground separation. Vis. Res. 38, 2657–2684 (1998).

Wagemans, J. in The Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Vol. 2 (ed. Wixted, J. T.) 803–872 (Wiley, 2018).

Hall, E. T. in The Hidden Dimension (eds. McNickle, R. et al.) 113–125 (Doubleday, 1966).

Neri, P., Luu, J. Y. & Levi, D. M. Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1186–1192 (2006).

Ding, X., Gao, Z. & Shen, M. Two equals one: two human actions during social interaction are grouped as one unit in working memory. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1311–1320 (2017).

Hayduk, L. A. Personal space: an evaluative and orienting overview. Psychol. Bull. 85, 117–134 (1978).

Sanchez-Vives, M. V. & Slater, M. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 332–339 (2005).

Parsons, T. D., Gaggioli, A. & Riva, G. Virtual reality for research in social neuroscience. Brain Sci. 7, 1–21 (2017).

Banakou, D., Groten, R. & Slater, M. Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12846–12851 (2013).

Claessens, P. M. & Wagemans, J. Perceptual grouping in Gabor lattices: proximity and alignment. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 1446–1459 (2005).

Apfelbaum, E. P., Sommers, S. R. & Norton, M. I. Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 918–932 (2008).

Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. in Revisioning Gender (eds Ferree, M. M. et al.) 365–398 (AltaMira, 1999).

Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W. & Finkel, E. J. Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101, 557–570 (2011).

Reis, H. T., Nezlek, J. & Wheeler, L. Physical attractiveness in social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38, 604–617 (1980).

Hayduk, L. A. The shape of personal space: an experimental investigation. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 13, 87–93 (1981).

Argyle, M. Bodily Communication (Routledge, 2013).

Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J. & LeBeau, L. S. Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 131, 898–924 (2005).

Vacharkulksemsuk, T. et al. Dominant, open nonverbal displays are attractive at zero-acquaintance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4009–4014 (2016).

Hall, E. T. A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. Am. Anthropol. 65, 1003–1026 (1963).

Ellyson, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. in Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior (eds. Ellyson, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F.) 1–27 (Springer, 1985).

Hartuv, E. & Shamir, R. A clustering algorithm based on graph connectivity. Inform. Process. Lett. 76, 175–181 (2000).

Chen, K., Loy, C. C., Gong, S. & Xiang, T. Feature mining for localised crowd counting. In Proc. British Machine Vision Conference 2012 1–11 (BMVC, 2012).

Zen, G., Lepri, B., Ricci, E. & Lanz, O. Space speaks—towards socially and personality aware visual surveillance. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Multimodal Pervasive Video Analysis 37–42 (ACM, 2010).

Sekuler, A. B. Motion segregation from speed differences: evidence for nonlinear processing. Vis. Res. 30, 785–795 (1990).

Feng, L. & Bhanu, B. Understanding dynamic social grouping behaviors of pedestrians. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signa. 9, 317–329 (2015).

Palomares, N. A. Toward a theory of goal detection in social interaction. Commun. Res. 35, 109–148 (2008).

Watson, A. C., Nixon, C. L., Wilson, A. & Capage, L. Social interaction skills and theory of mind in young children. Dev. Psychol. 35, 386–391 (1999).

Kelly, H. H. & Stahelski, A. J. Social interaction basis of cooperators’ and competitors’ beliefs about others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 16, 66–91 (1970).

Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K. & Gaertner, S. L. Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 62–68 (2002).

Mondloch, C. J. et al. Face perception during early infancy. Psychol. Sci. 10, 419–422 (1999).

Rosenthal, T. L. & Zimmerman, B. J. Social Learning and Cognition (Academic, 2014).

Wellman, H. M. Making Minds: How Theory of Mind Develops (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).

Mehrabian, A. Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 32, 296–308 (1968).

Kersten, D., Mamassian, P. & Yuille, A. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 271–304 (2004).

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D. & Watson, J. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev. 72, 655–684 (2001).

Adolphs, R. The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 693–716 (2009).

Helbing, D. & Molnár, P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 51, 4282–4286 (1995).

Lewin, K. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. (Harpers, 1951).

Gessaroli, E., Santelli, E., di Pellegrino, G. & Frassinetti, F. Personal space regulation in childhood autism spectrum disorders. PLoS ONE 8, 1–8 (2013).

Mehran, R., Oyama, A. & Shah, M. Abnormal crowd behavior detection using social force model. In 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops 935–942 (IEEE, 2009).

Qin, Z. & Shelton, C. R. Social grouping for multi-target tracking and head pose estimation in video. IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 38, 2082–2095 (2016).

Chen, X., Qin, Z., An, L. & Bhanu, B. Multi-person tracking by online learned grouping model with non-linear motion context. IEEE T. Circ. Syst. Vid. 26, 2226–2239 (2016).

Jung, E. et al. The influence of human body orientation on distance judgments. Front. Psychol. 7, 1–9 (2016).

Vestner, T., Tipper, S. P., Hartley, T., Over, H. & Rueschemeyer, S.-A. Bound together: social binding leads to faster processing, spatial distortion, and enhanced memory of interacting partners. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000545 (2019).

Loy, C. C., Ke, C., Shaogang, G. & Xiang, T. in Modeling, Simulation and Visual Analysis of Crowds (eds. Ali, S. et al.) 347–382 (Springer, 2013).

Setti, F., Lanz, O., Ferrario, R., Murino, V. & Cristani, M. Multi-scale f-formation discovery for group detection. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 3547–3551 (IEEE, 2013).

Brainard, D. H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997).

Kleiner, M. et al. What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement (2007).

Weibull., W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech. 18, 293–297 (1951).

Kumagai S., Hotta K. (2014) HLAC between cells of HOG feature for crowd counting. in Advances in Visual Computing ISVC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8887 (eds. Bebis, G. et al.) (Springer, Cham, 2014).