A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012

∗Amadieu, 2009, Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning, Learning and Instruction, 19, 376, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.005 Anderson, 2009 Anderson, 2007, Perspectives on science learning, 3 ∗Ariasi, 2011, Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study, Instructional Science, 39, 581, 10.1007/s11251-010-9142-5 ∗Arnold, 2000, The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eye tracking, Cognition, 76, B13, 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00073-1 ∗Balslev, 2012, Visual expertise in paediatric neurology, European Paediatric Neurology Society, 16, 161, 10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.07.004 ∗Bartolotti, 2012, Language learning and control in monolinguals and bilinguals, Cognitive Science, 36, 1129, 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01243.x Beatty, 1982, Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources, Psychological Bulletin, 91, 276, 10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276 ∗Beesley, 2010, The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 1 ∗Blair, 2009, Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning, Cognition, 112, 330, 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.008 ∗Blair, 2009, Extremely selective attention: Eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1196 ∗Blythe, 2012, Inserting spaces into Chinese text helps readers to learn new words: An eye movement study, Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 241, 10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.004 ∗Bolger, 2011, Semantic categories and context in L2 vocabulary learning, Language Learning, 61, 614, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00624.x ∗Boucheix, 2010, An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations, Learning and Instruction, 20, 123, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015 ∗Brandt-Kobele, 2010, What asymmetries within comprehension reveal about asymmetries between comprehension and production: The case of verb inflection in language acquisition, Lingua, 120, 1910, 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.008 ∗Brockmole, 2010, Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1803, 10.3758/APP.72.7.1803 ∗Brown-Schmidt, 2009, Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog, Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 171, 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.003 ∗Brusnighan, 2012, Combining contextual and morphemic cues is beneficial during incidental vocabulary acquisition: Semantic transparency in novel compound word processing, Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 172, 10.1002/RRQ.015 ∗Castelhano, 2011, Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 890, 10.3758/s13423-011-0107-8 ∗Chaffin, 2001, Learning new word meanings from context: A study of eye movements, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 225 ∗de Koning, 2010, Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding?, Learning and Instruction, 20, 111, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.010 D’Melloa, 2012, Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 377, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.004 Duchowski, 2007 Gagné, 1993 Galván, 2010, Neural plasticity of development and learning, Human Brain, Mapping, 31, 879, 10.1002/hbm.21029 Gilman, 2003, Restricting the field of view to investigate theperceptual spans of pianists, Visual Cognition, 2, 201, 10.1080/713756679 Ginsburg, 1988 Goldberg, 2011, Eye tracking for visualization evaluation: reading values on linear versus radial graphs, Information Visualization, 10, 182, 10.1177/1473871611406623 Goldberg, 1999, Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24, 631, 10.1016/S0169-8141(98)00068-7 ∗Goldinger, 2009, Deficits in cross-race face learning: Insights from eye movements and pupillometry, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1105 Goswami, 2008 ∗Goujon, 2012, How visual and semantic information influence learning in familiar contexts, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1315 ∗Grüter, 2012, Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem?, Second Language Research, 28, 191, 10.1177/0267658312437990 ∗Guérard, 2011, The role of awareness in anticipation and recall performance in the hebb repetition paradigm: Implications for sequence learning, Memory & Cognition, 39, 1012, 10.3758/s13421-011-0084-1 ∗Guérard, 2009, The processing of spatial information in short-term memory: Insights from eye tracking the path length effect, Acta Psychologica, 132, 136, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.003 ∗Hegarty, 2010, Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 37 Hegarty, 1992, Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students’ eye fixations, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 76, 10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.76 ∗Henderson, 2005, Eye movements are functional during face learning, Memory & Cognition, 33, 98, 10.3758/BF03195300 ∗Herwig, 2011, Action–effect associations revealed by eye movements, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 531, 10.3758/s13423-011-0063-3 Hess, 1964, Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving, Science, 143, 1190, 10.1126/science.143.3611.1190 ∗Hoffman, 2010, The costs of supervised classification: The effect of learning task on conceptual flexibility, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 319, 10.1037/a0019042 Holmqvist, 2011 ∗Hout, 2011, Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: Evidence from eye movements, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 90 ∗Hsiao, 2008, Two fixations suffice in face recognition, Psychological Science, 19, 998, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02191.x ∗Huestegge, 2012, Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search, Psychological Research, 76, 270, 10.1007/s00426-011-0345-4 Hyönä, J. (Ed.). (2003). Section 5: Eye movements in media applications and communication. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 607–703). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. ∗Isaacowitz, 2012, Looking, feeling, and doing: Are there age differences in attention, mood, and behavioral responses to skin cancer information?, Health Psychology, 31, 650, 10.1037/a0026666 Jacob, 2003, Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises, 573 ∗Jarodzka, 2012, Conveying clinical reasoning based on visual observation via eye-movement modelling examples, Instructional Science, 40, 813, 10.1007/s11251-012-9218-5 ∗Johnson, 2012, An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 178 ∗Jones, 2011, Global statistical learning in a visual search task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 152 Just, 1980, A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension, Psychological Review, 87, 329, 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329 ∗Karacan, 2010, Change detection in desktop virtual environments: An eye-tracking study, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1305, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.002 ∗Kelly, 2011, Developing cultural differences in face processing, Developmental Science, 14, 1176, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01067.x ∗Kim, 2012, Joint attention, social-cognition, and recognition memory in adults, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1 ∗Kim, 2011, How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: An eye tracking study, Memory & Cognition, 39, 649, 10.3758/s13421-010-0050-3 ∗Koenig, 2011, Curved saccade trajectories reveal conflicting predictions in associative learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1164 LeCompte, 1993 ∗Lee, 2001, Does learning a complex task have to be complex?: A study in learning decomposition, Cognitive Psychology, 42, 267, 10.1006/cogp.2000.0747 Lee, 2010, White matter neuroplastic changes in long-term trained players of the game of “Baduk” (GO): A voxel-based diffusion-tensor imaging study, NeuroImage, 52, 9, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.014 ∗Lewis, 2012, Prereading questions and online text comprehension, Discourse Processes, 49, 367, 10.1080/0163853X.2012.662801 Litchfield, 2010, Viewing another person’s eye movements improves identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray inspection, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 251 ∗Liu, 2011, An examination of cognitive processing of multimedia information based on viewers’ eye movements, Interactive Learning Environments, 19, 503, 10.1080/10494820903520123 ∗Liu, 2011, Using eye-tracking technology to investigate the redundant effect of multimedia web pages on viewers’ cognitive processes, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2410, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.012 ∗Liu, 2011, The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 621, 10.1007/s10956-011-9293-4 Liversedge, 2000, Saccadic eye movements and cognition, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 6, 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01418-7 2011 Liversedge, 1998, Eye movements and measures of reading time, 55 ∗Meyer, 2010, Effects of animation’s speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning, Learning and Instruction, 20, 136, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.016 ∗Miller, 2012, Making healthy food choices using nutrition facts panels: The roles of knowledge, motivation, dietary modifications goals, and age, Appetite, 59, 129, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.009 Mintzes, 1999 ∗Miwa, 2011, A method to capture information encountering embedded in exploratory web searches, Information Research, 16, 487 ∗Mou, 2009, Layout geometry in encoding and retrieval of spatial memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 83 ∗Mu, 2010, Towards effective video annotation: An approach to automatically link notes with video content, Computers & Education, 55, 1752, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.021 ∗Nakabayashi, 2012, Independent influences of verbalization and race on the configural and featural processing of faces: A behavioral and eye movement study, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 61 ∗Neider, 2011, Older adults capitalize on contextual information to guide search, Experimental Aging Research, 37, 539, 10.1080/0361073X.2011.619864 ∗Ooms, 2012, Interpreting maps through the eyes of expert and novice users, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26, 1733, 10.1080/13658816.2011.642801 Öquist, 2004, Eye movement study of reading on a mobile device using the page and RSVP text presentation formats, 108 ∗Ozcelik, 2010, Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 110, 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.001 ∗Ozcelik, 2009, An eye-tracking study of how color coding affects multimedia learning, Computers & Education, 53, 445, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.002 2009 Posner, 1982, Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change, Science Education, 66, 211, 10.1002/sce.3730660207 ∗Pradhan, 2011, The effects of focused attention training (FOCAL) on the duration of novice drivers’ glances inside the vehicle, Ergonomics, 54, 917, 10.1080/00140139.2011.607245 Radach, 2004, Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research, 3 Rayner, 1986, Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211, 10.1016/0022-0965(86)90037-8 Rayner, 1998, Eye movement in reading and information processing: 20 years of research, Psychological Bulletins, 124, 372, 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 Rayner, 2009, Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457, 10.1080/17470210902816461 Rayner, 2006, Eye movements as reflections of comprehension process in reading, Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 241, 10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_3 ∗Rehder, 2009, Feature inference learning and eye tracking, Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 393, 10.1016/j.jml.2008.12.001 ∗Rehder, 2005, Thirty-something categorization results explained: Selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 811 ∗Rehder, 2005, Eye tracking and selective attention in category learning, Cognitive Psychology, 51, 1, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.11.001 ∗Renkewitz, 2012, Memory indexing: A novel method for tracing memory processes in complex cognitive tasks, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1622 ∗Roderer, 2012, The role of executive control of attention and selective encoding for preschoolers’ learning, Infant and Child Development, 21, 146, 10.1002/icd.738 ∗Roderer, 2010, Explicit and implicit confidence judgments and developmental differences in meta-memory: An eye-tracking approach, Metacognition and Learning, 5, 229, 10.1007/s11409-010-9059-z San Agustin, J., Skovsgaard, H., Mollenbach, E., Barret, M., Tall, M., Hansen, D. W., & Hansen, J. P. (2010). Evaluation of a low-cost open-source gaze tracker. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications, Austin, Texas. (March 22 - 24). http://dx.doi.acm.org/10.1145/1743666.1743685 ∗Schmidt-Weigand, 2010, A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning, Learning and Instruction, 20, 100, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011 ∗Schmiedtova, 2011, Do L2 speakers think in the L1 when speaking in the L2?, International Journal of Applied Linguistic, 8, 138 ∗Schneider, 2012, Eye gaze reveals a fast, parallel extraction of the syntax of arithmetic formulas, Cognition, 125, 475, 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.015 Schnotz, 1999 ∗Sekiguchi, 2011, Individual differences in face memory and eye fixation patterns during face learning, Acta Psychologica, 137, 1, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.014 ∗Shatzman, 2006, Prosodic knowledge affects the recognition of newly acquired words, Psychological Science, 17, 372, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01714.x ∗She, 2009, The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements, Computers & Education, 53, 1297, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.012 ∗Smerecnik, 2010, Understanding the positive effects of graphical risk information on comprehension: Measuring attention directed to written, tabular, and graphical risk information, Risk Analysis, 30, 1387, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01435.x ∗Stieff, 2011, Identifying representational competence with multi-representational displays, Cognition and Instruction, 29, 123, 10.1080/07370008.2010.507318 ∗Tremblay, 2011, Learning to parse liaison-initial words: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and, Cognition, 14, 257 Tsai, 2012, Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis, Computers & Education, 58, 375, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.012 Underwood, 1998, Eye guidance and visual information processing: Reading, visual search, picture perception and driving, 1 ∗van Asselen, 2011, Object based implicit contextual learning: A study of eye movements, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 297, 10.3758/s13414-010-0047-9 van Gog, 2009, Attention guidance during example study via the model’s eye movements, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 785, 10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.007 van Gog, 2010, Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning, Learning and Instruction, 20, 95, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009 ∗Wang, 2011, Attention and relative novelty in human perceptual learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37, 436 ∗Welham, 2011, Unitization, similarity, and overt attention in categorization and exposure, Memory & Cognition, 39, 1518, 10.3758/s13421-011-0124-x ∗Whitford, 2012, Second-language experience modulates first- and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 73, 10.3758/s13423-011-0179-5 ∗Wiebe, 2009, Haptic feedback and students’ learning about levers: Unravelingthe effect of simulated touch, Computers & Education, 53, 667, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.004 ∗Wills, 2007, Predictive learning, prediction errors, and attention: Evidence from event-related potentials and eye tracking, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 843, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.843 ∗Wonnacott, 2008, Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language, Cognitive Psychology, 56, 165, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.002