A review of human error in aviation maintenance and inspection

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics - Tập 26 Số 2 - Trang 133-161 - 2000
Kara A. Latorella1, Prasad Prabhu2
1Department of Industrial Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
2Galaxy Scientific Corporation, 2310 Parklake Dr. Atlanta, GA 30345, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Air Transport Association, 1994. The Annual Report of the U.S. Scheduled Airline Industry (Brochure). Air Transport Association, Washington, DC.

Albert, 1994

Allen, 1995, A summary of the use and impact of the Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) on the commercial aviation industry, 359

Boeing Airplane Company, 1993a. Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Aircraft Accidents, Worldwide Operations, 1959–1992. Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle, WA.

Boeing Airplane Company, 1993b. Accident Prevention Strategies: Removing Links in the Accident Chain. Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle, WA.

Cacciabue, 1993, A dynamic reliability technique for error assessment in man-machine systems, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 403, 10.1006/imms.1993.1018

Chervak, S.G., Drury, C.G., 1995. Human factors audit program for maintenance. In: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Phase V Progress Report. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 93–126.

Drury, C.G., 2000. Relative advantages of portable computer-based workcards for aircraft inspection. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 3(1), in press.

Drury, 1997, Chapter 49

Drury, 1996, Automation in quality control and maintenance, 407

Drury, 1994, Function allocation in manufacturing, 2

Drury, 1991, Errors in aviation maintenance, 42

Drury, 1990, Task analysis of aircraft inspection activities, 1181

Drury, C.G., Prabhu, P.V., Wenner, C., Ramamurthy, M., 1996. Proactive error reporting system, In: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Phase VI Progress Report. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.

Edwards, 1972, Man and machine, 21

Endsley, 1988, Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancements, 97

Endsley, 1996, Team situation awareness in aviation maintenance, 1077

Federal Aviation Administration, 1995. Zero accidents: a shared responsibility. Aviation Safety Action Plan. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

Federal Aviation Administration, 1991. Assessment of Maintenance Performance Measures and A Demonstration of CRM Training Evaluation Analysis Plan. Task 3 Report. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.

Foyle, B., Dupont, G., 1995. Maintenance errors and their prevention. In: Proceedings of the Flight Safety Foundation International Federation of Airworthiness 48th Annual International Air Safety Seminar. Flight Safety Foundation, Arlington, VA, pp. 353–357.

Galaxy Scientific Corporation, 1993. Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance – Phase 2 Progress Report (NTIS DOT/FAA/AM-93/5). National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.

Gertman, 1993

Goldsby, 1991, Effects of automation in maintenance, 103

Goranson, U.G., 1989. Continuing airworthiness of aging jet transports. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Aging Aircraft. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 61–89.

Graeber, 1993, Reducing human error in aircraft maintenance operations, 147

Gramopadhye, 1996, Application of advanced technology to team training, 1072

Gregory, 1993, Maintainability by design

Hagemaier, D., 1989. Nondestructive testing of aging aircraft. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Aging Aircraft. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 186–198.

Hessburg, J., 1992. Human factors considerations on the 777 on-board maintenance system design. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Federal Aviation Administration Meeting on Human Factors Issues in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection “Maintenance 2000”. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, pp. 77–91.

Hollnagel, 1991, The genotype and phenotype of erroneous action: implications for HCI design

Hollnagel, E. 1990. The design of error tolerant interfaces. In: Proceedings of The First International Symposium on Ground Data Systems for Spacecraft Control. Darmstadt, Germany, June 26–29.

Husni, M. 1992. Advances in artificial intelligence for aircraft maintenance. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Federal Aviation Administration Meeting on Human Factors Issues in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection “Maintenance 2000.” National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, pp. 157–171.

Inaba, K., 1991. Converting technical publications into maintenance performance aids. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Human Factors in Aging Aircraft. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 167–193.

Inaba, K., Dey, M., 1991. Programmatic Root Cause Analysis of Maintenance Personnel Performance Problems. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

Johnson, W.B., 1990. An integrated maintenance information system (IMIS): an update. In: Final Report Second Federal Aviation Administration Meeting on Human Factors Issues in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection “Information Exchange and Communications.” Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 141–150.

Johnson, W.B., 1989. Research and development. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Aging Aircraft. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 30–35.

Johnson, 1993, The impact of human factors research on commercial aircraft maintenance and inspection, 187

Johnson, W.B., Norton, J.E., Utsman, L.G. 1992. New technology for the schoolhouse and flightline maintenance environments. In: Proceedings of the Seventh FAA Conference on Human Factors in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection (NTIS PB93-146975). Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.

Kirwan, 1992, Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 1, Applied Ergonomics, 23, 299, 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90292-4

Kirwan, 1992, Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 2, Applied Ergonomics, 23, 371, 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90368-6

Latia, D.C., 1993. Nondestructive Testing for Aircraft (Order no. EA-415). IAP, Casper, WY.

Latorella, 1992, Computer-simulated aircraft Inspection tasks for off-line experimentation, 92

Latorella, K., Drury, C.G. 1992. A framework for human reliability in aircraft inspection. In: Proceedings of the Seventh FAA Meeting on Human Factors Issues in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.

Layton, 1993, Job performance aids for the flight standard service, 26

Lock, M.W.B., Strutt, J.E., 1985. Reliability of In-Service Inspection of Transport Aircraft Structures (Report 85013). Civil Aviation Authority, London.

Loftgren, J., Drury, C.G., 1994. Human factors advances at Continental Airlines. In: Proceedings of the Eighth FAA/OAM Meeting on Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance and Inspection “Trends and Advances in Aviation Maintenance Operations.” National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, pp. 117–138.

Lorenzo, 1990

Lutzinger, 1992, Tomorrowı́s problems as seen by maintenance managers, 92

Marx, 1992, Looking towards 2000, 64

Mason, 1990, Improving plant and machinery maintainability, Applied Ergonomics, 3, 15, 10.1016/0003-6870(90)90069-A

Meghashyam, G., 1995. Electronic ergonomic audit system for maintenance and inspection. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA, pp. 1071–1813.

Nader, 1994

National Transportation Safety Board, 1984. Aircraft Accident Report, Eastern Airlines, Inc., L-1011, Miami, FL, May 5, 1983, (NTSB/AAR-84-04). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC.

National Transportation Safety Board, 1989. Aircraft Accident Report, Aloha Airlines, Flight 243, Boeing 737-200, N73711, Maui, Hawaii, April 28, 1988, (NTSB/AAR-89-03). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC.

National Transportation Safety Board, 1990. Aircraft Accident Report, United Airlines, Flight 232, McDonnell Douglas, DC-10, Sioux Gateway Airport, Sioux City, Iowa, July 19, 1989, (NTSB/AAR-90-06). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC.

National Transportation Safety Board, 1992. Aircraft Accident Report, Continental Express, Flight 135, Embraer 120, N33701, Eagle Lake, TX, September 11, 1991, (NTSB/AAR-92-04). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC.

National Transportation Safety Board, 1993a. Aircraft Accident Report, China Eastern Airlines, Flight 583. MD-11, B-2171, Shemya, Alaska, April 6, 1993, (NTSB/AAR-93-07). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC.

National Transportation Safety Board, 1993b. Aircraft Accident Report, Japan Airlines, Inc., Flight 46E, B-747-121, N473EV, Anchorage, Alaska, March 31, 1993, (NTSB/AAR-93-033). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC.

Nielsen, 1993

Norman, 1981, Categorization of action slips, Psychological Review, 88, 1, 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.1

Patel, 1994, Design of work control cards for aircraft inspection, Applied Ergonomics, 25, 283, 10.1016/0003-6870(94)90042-6

Patel, 1993, Design and usability evaluation of work control documentation, 1156

Prabhu, 1992, A framework for the design of the aircraft inspection information environment

Prabhu, 1992, Classification of temporal errors in CIM systems, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 5, 68, 10.1080/09511929208944517

Quintanilla, 1987, New technologies and human error

Rasmussen, 1990, The role of error in organizing behavior, Ergonomics, 33, 1185, 10.1080/00140139008925325

Rasmussen, 1985, Trends in human reliability analysis, Ergonomics, 28, 1185, 10.1080/00140138508963241

Rasmussen, 1982, Human errors, Journal of Occupational Accidents, 4, 311, 10.1016/0376-6349(82)90041-4

Rasmussen, 1989, Coping with human errors through system design, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31, 517, 10.1016/0020-7373(89)90014-X

Ravden, 1989

Reason, J. Maddox, M.E. 1995. Human error. In: Human Factors Guide for Aviation Maintenance. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (Chapter 14).

Reason, 1990

Reason, 1987, Collective planning and its failures

Reynolds, 1994, The effects of different forms of space restriction on inspection performance, 631

Reynolds, 1993, An evaluation of the visual environment in aircraft inspection, 34

Rogan, E., 1995a. MESH: Managing Engineering Safety Health. Human Factors 2, 5–6. British Airways Engineering, London.

Rogan, E., 1995b. Human factors in maintenance and engineering. In: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Phase V Progress Report. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 255–260.

Rouse, 1985, Optimal allocation of system development resources and/or tolerate human error, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 15, 620, 10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313438

Rouse, 1983, Analysis and classification of human error, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 13, 539, 10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313142

Ruffner, 1990

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). 1976. Engineering Design Serviceability Guidelines – Construction and Industrial Machinery. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.

Sears, R.L., 1986. A new look at accident contributions and the implications of operational training programs. (unpublished report). Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle, WA. Cited in Graeber, R.C., Marx, D.A., 1993. Reducing human error in aircraft maintenance operations. In: Proceedings of the Flight Safety Foundation International Federation of Airworthiness 46th Annual International Air Safety Seminar. Flight Safety Foundation, Arlington, VA, pp. 147–160.

Seigel, 1975, A family of models for measuring human reliability, 110

Senders, 1991

Shepherd, W.T., Johnson, W.B., 1995. Human factors in airline maintenance and inspection, In: Proceedings of the International Air Transport Association Maintenance Meeting. International Air Transport Association, Montreal, Canada.

Shepherd, W.T., Johnson, W.B., Drury, C.D., Taylor, J.C., Berninger, D., 1991. Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance, Phase 1: Progress Report: DOT/FAA/AM-91/16. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.

Strauch, 1984, Human factors considerations in aviation maintenance, 913

Swain, A., Guttman, H. 1983. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Poser Plan Applications: Final Report (NUREG/CR-1278). United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

Taggert, W., 1990. Introducing CRM into maintenance training. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Human Factors in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, pp. 93–110.

Taylor, 1990, Organizational context for aircraft maintenance and inspection, 1176

Taylor, 1987, The hermeneutics of accidents and safety

United Kingdom, Civil Aviation Authority (UK CAA). 1992. Flight Safety Occurrence Document, 92/D/12, June 9, 1992. Cited in Allen, J.P., Rankin, W.L., 1995. A summary of the use and impact of the maintenance error decision aid (MEDA) on the commercial aviation industry. In: Proceedings of the Flight Safety Foundation International Federation of Airworthiness 48th Annual International Air Safety Seminar. Flight Safety Foundation, Arlington, VA, pp. 359–369.

Wenner, C.L., Drury, C.G., 1996. A Unified Incident Reporting System for Maintenance Facilities. In: Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Phase VI Progress Report. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.

Woods, D., Johannesen, L., Cook, R., Sarter, N., 1995. Behind Human Error: Cognitive Systems, Computers, and Hindsight. Crew Systems Ergonomics Information and Analysis Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.

Woods, D.D., Roth, E.M., Pople, Jr., H.E., 1987. Cognitive Systems Engineering: An Artificial Intelligence Spleen for Human Performance Assessement (NUREG-CR-4862). US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.