A randomized controlled trial comparing nociception level (NOL) index, blood pressure, and heart rate responses to direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for intubation: the NOLint project

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia - Tập 68 - Trang 855-867 - 2021
Virginie Sbeghen1, Olivier Verdonck1, Jason McDevitt1, Valérie Zaphiratos1, Véronique Brulotte1, Christian Loubert1, Issam Tanoubi1, Pierre Drolet1, Marie-Eve Belanger1, Louis-Philippe Fortier1, Nadia Godin1, Marie-Claude Guertin2, Annik Fortier2, Philippe Richebé1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine of University of Montreal, and the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine of Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital, CIUSSS de l’Est de l’Ile de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
2Department of Statistics, Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center (MHICC), Montréal, Canada

Tóm tắt

The effect of direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade (MAC) vs GlideScope™ videolaryngoscopy using a Spectrum LoPro blade (GVL) on nociceptive stimulation has not been quantitatively studied. This study used the new nociception level (NOL) index to compare the nociceptive response induced by GVL or MAC during laryngoscopy with or without intubation. Patients underwent two laryngoscopies at four-minute intervals (L1, L2), one with GVL and the other with MAC (first randomization). A third laryngoscopy (L3) followed by tracheal intubation was performed four minutes after L2 (GVL or MAC, second randomization). Nociception was quantitatively assessed by NOL and standard hemodynamic parameters (heart rate [HR] and mean arterial pressure). For the crossover design, blade comparisons accounted for sequence and blade type. A possible carryover effect between laryngoscopies was assessed. In the 50 patients randomized, there was no carryover effect from one laryngoscopy to the next for all analyzed parameters. Nociception level index peak values were higher with MAC than GVL. Analysis of ΔNOL showed a lower nociceptive response with GVL for L1+L2 combined. Mean peak NOL values were significantly higher after L3+intubation than after L1+L2, for both GVL and MAC groups. Analysis of ΔHR values did not show a significant difference between GVL and MAC for any laryngoscopy. Laryngoscopy alone with GVL induces less nociception than with MAC. The NOL was more sensitive than HR at detecting nociceptive responses to MAC vs GVL. Additionally, and irrespective of which technique/blade was used, the combination of laryngoscopy + tracheal intubation produced a much greater nociceptive response than the laryngoscopy alone. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03277872); registered 29 August 2017.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Choi HJ, Kim YM, Oh YM, et al. GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department: a propensity score-matched analysis. BMJ Open 2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007884. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 41-52. Ibinson JW, Ezaru CS, Cormican DS, Mangione MP. GlideScope use improves intubation success rates: an observational study using propensity score matching. BMC Anesthesiol 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-101. Misirlioglu G, Sen O. Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy and Macintosh laryngoscope in ear-nose and throat surgery. Ir J Med Sci 2016; 185: 729-33. Savoldelli GL, Schiffer E, Abegg C, Baeriswyl V, Clergue F, Waeber JL. Comparison of the Glidescope, the McGrath, the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1358-64. Caldiroli D, Molteni F, Sommariva A, et al. Upper limb muscular activity and perceived workload during laryngoscopy: comparison of Glidescope® and Macintosh laryngoscopy in manikin: an observational study. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 563-9. Carassiti M, Biselli V, Cecchini S, et al. Force and pressure distribution using Macintosh and GlideScope laryngoscopes in normal airway: an in vivo study. Minerva Anestesiol 2013; 79: 515-24. Lee C, Russell T, Firat M, Cooper RM. Forces generated by Macintosh and GlideScope® laryngoscopes in four airway-training manikins. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 492-6. Lee RA, van Zundert AA, Maassen RL, Wieringa PA. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors by video laryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56: 224-9. Mitsdarffer B, Browder M. Comparison of the force required to perform endotracheal intubation on healthy adult patients utilizing the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2015; 13: 35-44. Russell T, Lee C, Firat M, Cooper RM. A comparison of the forces applied to a manikin during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 1098-102. Siddiqui N, Katznelson R, Friedman Z. Heart rate/blood pressure response and airway morbidity following tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy, GlideScope and Trachlight: a randomized control trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26: 740-5. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 2007; 19: 245-50. Benjamin FJ, Boon D, French RA. An evaluation of the GlideScope, a new video laryngoscope for difficult airways: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23: 517-21. Ben-Israel N, Kliger M, Zuckerman G, Katz Y, Edry R. Monitoring the nociception level: a multi-parameter approach. J Clin Monit Comput 2013; 27: 659-68. Edry R, Recea V, Dikust Y, Sessler DI. Preliminary intraoperative validation of the nociception level index: a noninvasive nociception monitor. Anesthesiology 2016; 125: 193-203. Martini CH, Boon M, Broens SJ, et al. Ability of the nociception level, a multiparameter composite of autonomic signals, to detect noxious stimuli during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2015; 123: 524-34. Stockle PA, Julien M, Issa R, et al. Validation of the PMD100 and its NOL index to detect nociception at different infusion regimen of remifentanil in patients under general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 2018; 84: 1160-8. Renaud-Roy E, Stockle PA, Maximos S, et al. Correlation between incremental remifentanil doses and the Nociception Level (NOL) index response after intraoperative noxious stimuli. Can J Anesth 2019; 66: 1049-61. Kohn JB. Adjusted or ideal body weight for nutrition assessment? J Acad Nutr Diet 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.02.007. Krenitsky J. Adjusted body weight, pro: evidence to support the use of adjusted body weight in calculating calorie requirements. Nutr Clin Pract 2005; 20: 468-73. Schwartz SN, Pazin GJ, Lyon JA, Ho M, Pasculle AW. A controlled investigation of the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and tobramycin in obese subjects. J Infect Dis 1978; 138: 499-505. Smetana KS, Ziemba R, May CC, Erdman MJ, Van Matre ET, Jones GM. Adjusted versus actual body weight dosing of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in obese patients with warfarin-associated major bleeding. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2018; 47: 369-74. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950; 3: 32-5.