A quadruple whammy for first-past-the-post
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Blau, 2001, Partisan bias in British general elections, British Elections and Parties Review, 11, 46, 10.1080/13689880108413053
Blau, A., 2002. Seats–votes Relationships in British General Elections, 1955–1997. University of Oxford, DPhil thesis.
Bogdanor, 1981
Butler, D., 1950. Electoral facts. The Economist, 7 January, 5–7.
Butler, 1950, Appendix III: analysis of the results
Butler, 1997
Chandler, 1992, The plurality vote: a reappraisal, Political Studies, 30, 87, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00521.x
Cowley, 2002
Curtice, 2001, The electoral system: biased to Blair?, 239
Curtice, 2003, The electoral system
Curtice, 1982, Electoral choice and the production of government: the changing operation of the electoral system in the United Kingdom since 1955, British Journal of Political Science, 12, 249, 10.1017/S0007123400002970
Curtice, 1986, Proportionality and exaggeration in the British electoral system, Electoral Studies, 5, 209, 10.1016/0261-3794(86)90012-0
Curtice, 1992, Appendix 2: the results analysed, 322
Curtice, 1997, Appendix 2: the results analysed, 295
Curtice, J., Steed, M., 1998. Neither representative nor accountable: first-past-the-post in Britain. Paper delivered at Elections, Public Opinion and Parties annual conference.
Curtice, 2002, Appendix 2: an analysis of the results, 304
Denemark, 2001, Choosing MMP in New Zealand: explaining the 1993 electoral reform, 70
Dunleavy, 2000, Elections and party politics, 127
Duverger, 1959
Edgeworth, 1905, The law of error, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 20, 35
Gelman, 1994, A unified method of evaluating electoral systems and redistricting plans, American Journal of Political Science, 38, 514, 10.2307/2111417
Gudgin, 1980, The decomposition of electoral bias in a plurality election, British Journal of Political Science, 10, 515, 10.1017/S0007123400002374
Hald, 1998
Harrop, 2001, An apathetic landslide: the British election of 2001, Government and Opposition, 36, 296, 10.1111/1477-7053.00067
Johnson, 1992
Johnson, 1998
Johnston, 2000, Canadian elections at the millennium, Choices, 6, 4
Johnston, 2001
Johnston, 2002, Distortion magnified: New Labour and the British electoral system, 1950–2001, British Elections and Parties Review, 12, 10.1080/13689880208413074
Kendall, 1950, The law of cubic proportion in election results, British Journal of Sociology, 1, 183, 10.2307/588113
King, 1976, Modes of executive–legislative relations: Great Britain, France and West Germany, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1, 11, 10.2307/439626
Major, 1999
Major, J., 2000. Seminar at Brasenose College, Oxford, 8 March.
March, 1957, Party legislative representation as a function of election results, Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, 521, 10.1086/266748
Norris, 2001, Apathetic landslide: the 2001 British general election, 1
Norton, 1978
Norton, 1992, Does Britain need proportional representation?, 136
Pinto-Duschinsky, 1999, Send the rascals packing: defects of proportional representation and the virtues of the Westminster model, Representation, 36, 117, 10.1080/00344899908523069
Popper, K., 1988. The open society and its enemies revisited. The Economist, 23 April, 19–22.
Powell, 2000
Rallings, 2002, Elections and public opinion: amidst the apathy, another landslide, Parliamentary Affairs, 55, 347, 10.1093/parlij/55.2.347
Rossiter, 1999, Changing biases in the operation of the UK’s electoral system, 1950–97, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1, 133, 10.1111/1467-856X.00008
Russell, 2001, Two steps forward, one step back? The Liberal Democrats’ 2001 general election performance in perspective, Representation, 38, 213, 10.1080/00344890108523183
Schwarz, 1980, Exploring a new role in policy making: the British House of Commons in the 1970s, American Political Science Review, 74, 23, 10.2307/1955644
Seldon, 1987, The Churchill administration, 1951-1955
Steed, 1974, Appendix 2: the results analysed, 313
Taagepera, 1989
Wilson, 1971