A predictive model for fling-step in near-fault ground motions based on recordings and simulations

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering - Tập 80 - Trang 119-126 - 2016
Lynne S. Burks1, Jack W. Baker1
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-3013, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bolt B, Abrahamson N. Estimation of strong seismic ground motion. In: International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, vol. 81B. Academic Press; 2003. p. 983–1001. Boore, 2005, Processing of strong-motion accelerograms, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 25, 93, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.007 Boore, 2001, Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 91, 1199, 10.1785/0120000703 Akkar, 2009, On baseline corrections and uncertainty in response spectra for baseline variations commonly encountered in digital accelerograph records, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 99, 1671, 10.1785/0120080206 Alavi B, Krawinkler H. Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. Technical report 138, Stanford, CA; Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, 2001. Kalkan, 2006, Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings, Earthq Spectra, 22, 367, 10.1193/1.2192560 Abrahamson NA. Velocity pulses in near-fault ground motions. In: Proceedings of the UC Berkeley—CUREE symposium in honor of Ray Clough and Joseph Penzien, Berkeley, CA; 2002. p. 40–41. Kamai, 2014, Adding fling effects to processed ground-motion time histories, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 104, 1914, 10.1785/0120130272 Michel, 1999, Measuring near field coseismic displacements from SAR images, Geophys Res Lett, 26, 3017, 10.1029/1999GL900524 Simons, 2002, Coseismic deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake as inferred from InSAR and GPS observations, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 92, 1390, 10.1785/0120000933 Burks LS. Ground motion simulations: Validation and application for civil engineering problems [Ph.D. thesis]. Stanford, CA, Stanford University, 2014. Chiou, 2008, NGA project strong-motion database, Earthq Spectra, 24, 23, 10.1193/1.2894831 Ancheta TD, Darragh RB, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Silva WJ, Chiou BSJ. et al. PEER NGA-West2 database. Technical report. PEER 2013/03, Berkeley, CA, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2013. CESMD. Center for engineering strong motion data; 2012. URL 〈www.strongmotioncenter.org〉. Haddadi H, Shakal A, Huang M, Parrish J, Stephens C, Savage W, et al. Report on progress at the center for engineering strong motion data (CESMD). In: 15th World conference on earthquake engineering. Lisbon, Portugal; 2012. p. 1–7. Ambraseys, 2004, Internet site for European strong-motion data, Boll Geofis Terorica Appl, 45, 113 Luzi, 2008, ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive), Seismol Res Lett, 79, 716, 10.1785/gssrl.79.5.716 Pacor, 2011, Overview of the Italian strong motion database ITACA 1.0, Bull Earthq Eng, 9, 1723, 10.1007/s10518-011-9327-6 Chen X. Near-field ground motion from the landers earthquake. Technical report. EERL 95-02. Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory; California Institute of Technology; 1995. Iwan, 1985, Some observations on strong-motion earthquake measurement using a digital accelerograph, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 75, 1225, 10.1785/BSSA0750051225 Wu, 2007, Approximate recovery of coseismic deformation from Taiwan strong-motion records, J Seismol, 11, 159, 10.1007/s10950-006-9043-x Douglas, 2008, A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes, Surv Geophys, 29, 187, 10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y Aagaard, 2008, Ground-motion modeling of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, Part I, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 98, 989, 10.1785/0120060409 Aagaard, 2008, Ground-motion modeling of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, Part II, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 98, 1012, 10.1785/0120060410 Aagaard, 2010, Ground-motion modeling of Hayward fault scenario earthquakes, Part 1, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 100, 2927, 10.1785/0120090324 Aagaard, 2010, Ground-motion modeling of Hayward fault scenario earthquakes, Part II, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 100, 2945, 10.1785/0120090379 Graves, 2010, Broadband ground-motion simulation using a hybrid approach, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 100, 2095, 10.1785/0120100057 SCEC. Broadband Platform; 2012. URL 〈http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/Broadband_Platform〉. Miyazaki, 2004, Modeling the rupture process of the 2003 September 25 Tokachi-Oki (Hokkaido) earthquake using 1-Hz GPS data, Geophys Res Lett, 31, 10.1029/2004GL021457 Ji, 2004, Slip history of the 2003 San Simeon earthquake constrained by combining 1-Hz GPS, strong motion, and teleseismic data, Geophys Res Lett, 31, 10.1029/2004GL020448 Emore, 2007, Recovering seismic displacements through combined use of 1-Hz gps and strong-motion accelerometers, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 97, 357, 10.1785/0120060153 Bock, 2011, Real-time strong-motion broadband displacements from collocated GPS and accelerometers, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 101, 2904, 10.1785/0120110007 Lewis, 2007, Implementing generating set search methods for linearly constrained minimization, SIAM J Sci Comput, 29, 2507, 10.1137/050635432 Bray, 2004, Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 24, 815, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.05.001 Shahi, 2011, An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 101, 742, 10.1785/0120100090 Byerley, 1958, Energy in earthquakes as computed from geodetic observations, 17 Wells, 1994, New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 84, 974 Somerville PG. Development of an improved representation of near fault ground motions. In: Seminar on utilization of strong-motion data. Oakland, CA; 1998, p. 1–20. Somerville, 1999, Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion, Seismol Res Lett, 70, 59, 10.1785/gssrl.70.1.59