A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastidmatKgene resolves many well‐supported subclades within the family

American Journal of Botany - Tập 91 Số 11 - Trang 1846-1862 - 2004
Martin F. Wojciechowski1, Matt Lavin2, Michael J. Sanderson3
12School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501 USA
23Department of Plant Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717 USA
34Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA

Tóm tắt

Phylogenetic analysis of 330 plastidmatKgene sequences, representing 235 genera from 37 of 39 tribes, and four outgroup taxa from eurosids I supports many well‐resolved subclades within the Leguminosae. These results are generally consistent with those derived from other plastid sequence data (rbcLandtrnL), but show greater resolution and clade support overall. In particular, the monophyly of subfamily Papilionoideae and at least seven major subclades are well‐supported by bootstrap and Bayesian credibility values. These subclades are informally recognized as theCladrastisclade, genistoid sensu lato, dalbergioid sensu lato, mirbelioid, millettioid, and robinioid clades, and the inverted‐repeat‐lacking clade (IRLC). The genistoid clade is expanded to include genera such asPoecilanthe,Cyclolobium,Bowdichia, andDiplotropisand thus contains the vast majority of papilionoids known to produce quinolizidine alkaloids. The dalbergioid clade is expanded to include the tribe Amorpheae. The mirbelioids include the tribes Bossiaeeae and Mirbelieae, with Hypocalypteae as its sister group. The millettioids comprise two major subclades that roughly correspond to the tribes Millettieae and Phaseoleae and represent the only major papilionoid clade marked by a macromorphological apomorphy, pseudoracemose inflorescences. The robinioids are expanded to includeSesbaniaand members of the tribe Loteae. The IRLC, the most species‐rich subclade, is sister to the robinioids. Analysis of thematKdata consistently resolves but modestly supports a clade comprising papilionoid taxa that accumulate canavanine in the seeds. This suggests a single origin for the biosynthesis of this most commonly produced of the nonprotein amino acids in legumes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1093/molbev/msg028

Allan G. J., 2003, Advances in legume systematics, part 10, Higher level systematics,, 371

10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x

Bell E. A., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 2,, 489

Bentham G., 1837, Commentationes de Leguminosarum Generibus.

10.1007/BF00047679

Bruneau A. F., 2001, Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences., Systematic Botany, 26, 487

Chappill J. A., 1995, Advances in legume systematics, part 7, Phylogeny,, 1

10.2307/2399846

Crepet W. L., 1992, Advances in legume systematics, part 4, The fossil record,, 43

10.1126/science.228.4703.1087

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1986.tb12075.x

Crisp M. D., 2003, Advances in legume systematics, part 10, Higher level systematics,, 253

Crisp M. D., 2000, Advances in legume systematics, part 9,, 249

Crisp M. D., 1987, Advances in legume systematics, part 3,, 65

De Lima H. C., 1990, Tribo Dalbergieae (Leguminosae Papilionoideae)— morfologia do frutos, sementes e plântulase sua aplicaçao na sistemática., Arquivos do Jardim Botânico de Rio de Janeiro, 30, 1

10.1016/0169-5347(94)90231-3

Doyle J. J., 1995, Advances in legume systematics, part 7, Phylogeny,, 11

Doyle J. J., 2000, Advances in legume systematics, part 9,, 1

10.1007/s10592-005-9073-x

10.2307/2446030

10.1006/mpev.1996.0038

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x

Gasson P., 1994, Advances in legume systematics, part 6, Structural botany,, 165

Gasson P., 2000, Advances in legume systematics, part 9,, 201

Geesink R., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 1,, 245

Geesink R., 1984, Scala Millettiearum, 10.1163/9789004628083

Goldblatt P., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 2,, 427

Herendeen P. S., 1995, Advances in legume systematics, part 7, phylogeny,, 123

Herendeen P. S., 2003, Advances in legume systematics, part 10, Higher level systematics,, 37

Herendeen P. S., 1992, Advances in legume systematics, part 4, The fossil record,, 303

10.1086/376881

Hu J.‐M., 2000, Advances in legume systematics, part 9,, 299

10.2307/2656638

Hu J.‐M., 2002, Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8 S sequences in the tribe Millettieae (Fabaceae): Poecilanthe‐Cyclolobium, the core Millettieae, and the Callerya group., Systematic Botany, 27, 722

10.1080/10635150290102366

10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754

10.1600/036364404774195557

Hutchinson J., 1964, The genera of flowering plants (Angiospermae), vol

Ireland H. R., 2000, Advances in legume systematics, part 9,, 217

10.2307/2399875

Kajita T. H., 2001, rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and Allies., Systematic Botany, 26, 515

10.1111/j.1438-8677.1995.tb00845.x

10.1016/0305-1978(96)00032-4

10.1006/mpev.1997.0410

Kinghorn A. D., 1984, Alkaloids: chemical and biological perspectives,, 105

10.1016/S0305-1978(03)00118-2

Lackey J. A., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 1,, 301

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05207.x

10.2307/2446334

Lavin M. P. S.HerendeenandM. F.Wojciechowski. In press.Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of the major family lineages immediately following an Early Tertiary emergence.Systematic Biology.

10.2307/2657116

10.2307/25027850

10.2307/2666689

Lavin M. M., 2003, Phylogeny of robinioid legumes (Fabaceae) revisited: Coursetia and Gliricidia recircumscribed, and a biogeographical appraisal of the Caribbean endemics., Systematic Botany, 28, 387

10.2307/3558432

Lewis G. P., Legumes of the world

Liston A., 1995, Advances in legume systematics, part 7, Phylogeny,, 31

Luckow M. J., 2003, Advances in legume systematics, part 10, Higher level systematics,, 197

Luckow M. P., 2000, Advances in legume systematics, part 9,, 165

Mabberley D. J., 1997, The plant book

10.2307/2446139

McKey D., 1994, Advances in legume systematics 5, the nitrogen factor,, 211

10.3732/ajb.91.8.1219

Miller J. T., 2003, A phylogenetic analysis of the Acacieae and Ingeae (Mimosoideae: Fabaceae) based on trnK, matK, psbA‐trnH, and trnL/trnF sequence data., Systematic Botany, 28, 558

10.2307/2399828

Pennington R. T., 2000, Advances in legume systematics, part 9,, 233

Pennington R. T., 2001, Phylogenetic relationships of basal papilionoid legumes based upon sequences of the chloroplast trnL intron., Systematic Botany, 26, 537

10.2307/1223706

Polhill R. M., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 1,, 191

Polhill R. M., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 1,, 213

Polhill R. M., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 1, 398

Polhill R. M., 1994, Phytochemical dictionary of the Leguminosae, xxxv–xlviii

Polhill R. M., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 1,, 1

10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817

Raven P. H., 1995, Origin and relationships of the California Flora.

10.1600/0363644041744464

Rundel R. W., 1989, Ecological success in relation to plant form and function in the woody legumes, Advances in legume biology, Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 29, 377

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13942.x

Schrire B. D. G. P.LewisandM.Lavin. In press.Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: insights from recent phylogenies.InI.FriisandH.Balsley[eds.] Plant diversity and complexity patterns—Local regional and global dimensions.Biologiske Skrifter..

10.2307/3391993

10.1111/j.1095-8339.2000.tb01588.x

10.1073/pnas.92.7.2647

10.2307/2399827

Sprent J. I., 1994, Advances in legume systematics, part 5, The nitrogen factor,, 1

Sprent J. I., 2001, Nodulation in legumes

Steele K. P., 2000, Sister group relationships of Fabaceae and Rosaceae: phylogenetic relationships of Eurosids I., American Journal of Botany, 87, S160

10.2307/2419717

Steele K. P., 2003, Advances in legume systematics, part 10, higher level systematics,, 355

Stirton C. H., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 2,, 337

10.1073/pnas.212646199

Swofford D. L., 2002, PAUP*:. phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.

Takhtajan A., 1969, Flowering plants

10.1093/nar/25.24.4876

Thompson I. R., 2001, Phylogenetic studies of the tribe Brongniartieae (Fabaceae) using nuclear DNA (ITS‐1) and morphological data., Systematic Botany, 26, 557

Thulin M. M.LavinR.PasquetandA.Delgado‐Salinas. In press.Phylogeny and biogeography ofWajira(Leguminosae): a monophyletic segregate ofVignacentered in the Horn of Africa region.Systematic Botany..

Tucker S. C., 1987, Advances in legume systematics, part 3,, 183

10.1111/j.1095-8339.1987.tb01996.x

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb14555.x

10.1086/324557

10.1104/pp.102.017459

10.3732/ajb.90.9.1271

Tucker S. C., 1994, Advances in legume systematics, part 6, Structural botany,, 11

Turner B. L., 1981, Advances in legume systematics, part 1,, 403

10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00051.x

10.1016/S0305-1978(03)00083-8

10.1016/0305-1978(93)90075-3

Van Wyk B.‐E., 1995, Advances in legume systematics, part 7, Phylogeny,, 283

Whiting M. F., 1997, The strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology., Systematic Biology, 46, 1

10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00244-0

10.1016/S0305-1978(03)00085-1

Wojciechowski M. F., 2003, Advances in legume systematics, part 10, Higher leval systematics,, 5

10.2307/2419698

Wojciechowski M. F., 2000, Advances in legume systematics, part 9,, 277

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

American Journal of Botany

Tập 91 Số 11

1846-1862

Thông tin tác giả