A phenomenological model for cell and nucleus deformation during cancer metastasis
Tóm tắt
Cell migration plays an essential role in cancer metastasis. In cancer invasion through confined spaces, cells must undergo extensive deformation, which is a capability related to their metastatic potentials. Here, we simulate the deformation of the cell and nucleus during invasion through a dense, physiological microenvironment by developing a phenomenological computational model. In our work, cells are attracted by a generic emitting source (e.g., a chemokine or stiffness signal), which is treated by using Green’s Fundamental solutions. We use an IMEX integration method where the linear parts and the nonlinear parts are treated by using an Euler backward scheme and an Euler forward method, respectively. We develop the numerical model for an obstacle-induced deformation in 2D or/and 3D. Considering the uncertainty in cell mobility, stochastic processes are incorporated and uncertainties in the input variables are evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. This quantitative study aims at estimating the likelihood for invasion and the length of the time interval in which the cell invades the tissue through an obstacle. Subsequently, the two-dimensional cell deformation model is applied to simplified cancer metastasis processes to serve as a model for in vivo or in vitro biomedical experiments.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abuhattum S, Weihs D (2016) Asymmetry in traction forces produced by migrating preadipocytes is bounded to 33%. Med Eng Phy 38(9):834–838
Borau C, Polacheck WJ, Kamm RD, García-Aznar JM (2014) Probabilistic voxel-fe model for single cell motility in 3D. In Silico Cell Tissue Sci 1(1):2
Brunner CA, Ehrlicher A, Kohlstrunk B, Knebel D, Käs JA, Goegler M (2006) Cell migration through small gaps. Eur Biophys J 35(8):713–719
Byrne H, Drasdo D (2009) Individual-based and continuum models of growing cell populations: a comparison. J Math Biol 58(4):657–687
Cao X, Moeendarbary E, Isermann P, Davidson PM, Wang X, Chen MB, Burkart AK, Lammerding J, Kamm RD, Shenoy VB (2016) A chemomechanical model for nuclear morphology and stresses during cell transendothelial migration. Biophys J 111(7):1541–1552
Celià-Terrassa T, Kang Y (2016) Distinctive properties of metastasis-initiating cells. Gene Dev 30(8):892–908
Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC (2002a) Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer 2:563
Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC (2002b) Metastasis: dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer 2(8):563–572
Champion JA, Mitragotri S (2006) Role of target geometry in phagocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(13):4930–4934
Chen J, Weihs D, Vermolen FJ (2018) Monte carlo uncertainty quantification in modelling cell deformation during cancer metastasis CMBBE2018 conference proceeding
Chen J, Weihs D, Vermolen FJ (2018) A model for cell migration in non-isotropic fibrin networks with an application to pancreatic tumor islets. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17:367–386
Cumming BD, McElwain DLS, Upton Z (2010) A mathematical model of wound healing and subsequent scarring. J R Soc Interface 7(42):19–34
Davidson PM, Denais C, Bakshi MC, Lammerding J (2014) Nuclear deformability constitutes a rate-limiting step during cell migration in 3-D environments. Cell Mol Bioeng 7(3):293–306
Denais CM, Gilbert RM, Isermann P, McGregor AL, Lindert M, Weigelin B, Davidson PM, Friedl P, Wolf K, Lammerding J (2016) Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration. Science 352(6283):353–358
Drasdo D, Kree R, McCaskill JS (1995) Monte carlo approach to tissue-cell populations. Physic Rev E 52(6):6635
Fidler IJ (2003) The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the’seed and soil’hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 3(6):453–458
Friedl P, Wolf K, Lammerding J (2011) Nuclear mechanics during cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23(1):55–64
Galle J, Loeffler M, Drasdo D (2005) Modeling the effect of deregulated proliferation and apoptosis on the growth dynamics of epithelial cell populations in vitro. Biophys J 88(1):62–75
Giverso C, Arduino A, Preziosi L (2018) How nucleus mechanics and ECM microstructure influence the invasion of single cells and multicellular aggregates. Bull Math Biol 80:1017–1045
Guck J, Schinkinger S, Lincoln B, Wottawah F, Ebert S, Romeyke M, Lenz D, Erickson HM, Ananthakrishnan R, Mitchell D et al (2005) Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 88(5):3689–3698
Gupta GP, Massagué J (2006) Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell 127(4):679–695
Jayaraman S, Joo NS, Reitz B, Wine JJ, Verkman AS (2001) Submucosal gland secretions in airways from cystic fibrosis patients have normal [Na+] and pH but elevated viscosity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(14):8119–8123
Kalebic T, Garbisa S, Glaser B, Liotta LA (1983) Basement membrane collagen: degradation by migrating endothelial cells. Science 221(4607):281–283
Kopfstein L, Christofori G (2006) Metastasis: cell-autonomous mechanisms versus contributions by the tumor microenvironment. Cell Mol Life Sci 63(4):449–468
Lambert AW, Pattabiraman DR, Weinberg RA (2017) Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell 168(4):670–691
Lämmermann T, Sixt M (2009) Mechanical modes of amoeboid cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21(5):636–644
Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF (1996) Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84(3):359–369
Luzzi KJ, MacDonald IC, Schmidt EE, Kerkvliet N, Morris VL, Chambers AF, Groom AC (1998) Multistep nature of metastatic inefficiency: dormancy of solitary cells after successful extravasation and limited survival of early micrometastases. Am J Pathol 153(3):865–873
Madzvamuse A, George UZ (2013) The moving grid finite element method applied to cell movement and deformation. Finite Elem Anal Des 74:76–92
Mahadevan S (1997) Monte carlo simulation. Mechanical Engineering-New York and Basel-Marcel Dekker, pp 123–146
Mak M, Erickson D (2013) A serial micropipette microfluidic device with applications to cancer cell repeated deformation studies. Integr Biol 5(11):1374–1384
Mak M, Reinhart-King CA, Erickson D (2013) Elucidating mechanical transition effects of invading cancer cells with a subnucleus-scaled microfluidic serial dimensional modulation device. Lab Chip 13(3):340–348
Marth W, Voigt A (2014) Signaling networks and cell motility: a computational approach using a phase field description. J Math Biol 69(1):91–112
Massalha S, Weihs D (2017) Metastatic breast cancer cells adhere strongly on varying stiffness substrates, initially without adjusting their morphology. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16(3):961–970
Mooney CZ (1997) Monte carlo simulation, vol 116. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Moussavi-Baygi R, Jamali Y, Karimi R, Mofrad MRK (2011) Brownian dynamics simulation of nucleocytoplasmic transport: a coarse-grained model for the functional state of the nuclear pore complex. PLoS Comput Biol 7(6):e1002049
Myrand-Lapierre M-E, Deng X, Ang RR, Matthews K, Santoso AT, Ma H (2015) Multiplexed fluidic plunger mechanism for the measurement of red blood cell deformability. Lab Chip 15(1):159–167
Odell G, Oster G, Burnside B, Alberch P (1980) A mechanical model for epithelial morphogenesis. J Math Biol 9(3):291–295
Odenthal T, Smeets B, Van Liedekerke P, Tijskens E, Van Oosterwyck H, Ramon H (2013) Analysis of initial cell spreading using mechanistic contact formulations for a deformable cell model. PLoS Comput Biol 9(10):e1003267
Paňková K, Rösel D, Novotnỳ M, Brábek J (2010) The molecular mechanisms of transition between mesenchymal and amoeboid invasiveness in tumor cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 67(1):63–71
Paul CD, Hung W-C, Wirtz D, Konstantopoulos K (2016) Engineered models of confined cell migration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 18:159–180
Paul CD, Mistriotis P, Konstantopoulos K (2017) Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces. Nat Rev Cancer 17(2):131–140
Pinner S, Sahai E (2008) Imaging amoeboid cancer cell motility in vivo. J Microsc 231(3):441–445
Rey R, Garcia-Aznar JM (2013) A phenomenological approach to modelling collective cell movement in 2D. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12(6):1089–1100
Sahai E (2007) Illuminating the metastatic process. Nat Rev Cancer 7(10):737–749
Sahai E, Marshall CJ (2003) Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for rho/rock signalling and extracellular proteolysis. Nat Cell Biol 5(8):711–719
Savinell JM, Lee GM, Palsson BO (1989) On the orders of magnitude of epigenic dynamics and monoclonal antibody production. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 4(5):231–234
Serrano-Alcalde F, García-Aznar JM, José Gómez-Benito M (2017) The role of nuclear mechanics in cell deformation under creeping flows. J Theor Biol 432:25–32
Seyfried TN, Huysentruyt LC (2013) On the origin of cancer metastasis. Crit Rev Oncog 18(1–2):43
Springer TA (1994) Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 76(2):301–314
Steele JM (2012) Stochastic calculus and financial applications. Springer, Berlin
Tozluoğlu M, Tournier AL, Jenkins RP, Hooper S, Bates PA (2013) Matrix geometry determines optimal cancer cell migration strategy and modulates response to interventions. Nat Cell Biol 15(7):751
Van Liedekerke P, Palm MM, Jagiella N, Drasdo D (2015) Simulating tissue mechanics with agent-based models: concepts, perspectives and some novel results. Comput Part Mech 2(4):401–444
van Oers RFM, Rens EG, LaValley DJ, Reinhart-King CA, Merks RMH (2014) Mechanical cell-matrix feedback explains pairwise and collective endothelial cell behavior in vitro. PLoS Comput Biol 10(8):e1003774
Vermolen FJ, Gefen A (2012) A semi-stochastic cell-based formalism to model the dynamics of migration of cells in colonies. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11(1):183–195
Vermolen FJ, Gefen A (2013) A phenomenological model for chemico-mechanically induced cell shape changes during migration and cell-cell contacts. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12:301–323
Vermolen FJ, Mul MM, Gefen A (2014) Semi-stochastic cell-level computational modeling of the immune system response to bacterial infections and the effects of antibiotics. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13(4):713–734
Wolf K, Mazo I, Leung H, Engelke K, Von Andrian UH, Deryugina EI, Strongin AY, Bröcker E-B, Friedl P (2003) Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration. J Cell Biol 160(2):267–277
Wolf K, Alexander S, Schacht V, Coussens LM, von Andrian UH, van Rheenen J, Deryugina E, Friedl P (2009) Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. In: Seminars in cell & developmental biology. Elsevier
Wolf K, Te Lindert M, Krause M, Alexander S, Te Riet J, Willis AL, Hoffman RM, Figdor CG, Weiss SJ, Friedl P (2013) Physical limits of cell migration: control by ecm space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J Cell Biol 201(7):1069–1084
Wyckoff JB, Pinner SE, Gschmeissner S, Condeelis JS, Sahai E (2006) Rock-and myosin-dependent matrix deformation enables protease-independent tumor-cell invasion in vivo. Curr Biol 16(15):1515–1523
Zhao P, Zhang W, Wang S-J, Xiao-Ling Y, Tang J, Huang W, Li Y, Cui H-Y, Guo Y-S, Tavernier J et al (2011) HAb18G/CD147 promotes cell motility by regulating annexin II-activated RhoA and Rac1 signaling pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology 54(6):2012–2024