A novel improved symbiotic organisms search algorithm

Computational Intelligence - Tập 38 Số 3 - Trang 947-977 - 2022
Sukanta Nama1, Apu Kumar Saha1, Sushmita Sharma1
1Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology Agartala, Barjala, Jirania, Tripura, India

Tóm tắt

AbstractFor last two decades, nature‐inspired metaheuristic algorithms together with their modified, improved, and hybrid versions have been gaining huge popularity in the field of optimization in solving continuous and complex real‐life optimization problems. In this work, a novel improved symbiosis organism search (SOS) algorithm, called self‐adaptive beneficial factor‐based improved SOS (SaISOS, in short) is suggested. The self‐adaptive benefit factors and a modified mutualism phase (called “Three‐way mutualism phase”) have been introduced here to upgrade the performance of SOS algorithm. A random weighted reflection coefficient and a new control operator have also been introduced. To validate the proposed algorithm and to compare its performance with other state‐of‐the‐art algorithms, 15 IEEE‐CEC 2015 functions have been employed and the experimental results confirm that SaISOS provides competitive results on most occasions. Also, the proposed algorithm is used to solve five real‐world optimization problems. Considering the average output, it is observed that the proposed method performs significantly better in solving the real‐world problems compared to the alternative state‐of‐the art techniques considered in this work.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001

Price KV, 2005, Natural Computing Series

ShiY EberhartR. A modified particle swarm optimizer. Paper presented at: IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence; 1998:69‐73.

10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x

10.1016/j.amc.2013.02.017

10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.007

10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.033

10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.007

10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.010

10.1109/4235.771166

SmucT. Sensitivity of differential evolution algorithm to value of control parameters. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2002:1087‐1093.

Law NL, 2007, Conference proceedings of IJCAI‐07, 2330

10.1016/j.asoc.2016.09.037

OmranM SalmanA andEngelbrechtAP et al. Self‐adaptive differential evolution. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Intelligence Security Part. 1. Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence; Vol. 3801 2005:192‐199.

10.1109/TEVC.2009.2014613

10.1109/TEVC.2006.872133

10.1109/TEVC.2008.927706

10.1007/s00500-010-0643-6

10.1016/j.asoc.2010.04.024

YangZ TangK YaoX et al. Self‐adaptive differential evolution with neighborhood search. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation; 2008:1110‐1116; Hong Kong.

10.1109/TEVC.2010.2087271

Lu X, 2014, A new self‐adaptation scheme for differential evolution, Neuro Comput Secur, 146, 2

10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.9.003

10.1080/02331934.2014.917302

10.1007/s10706-015-9898-0

10.5267/j.dsl.2016.2.004

10.1007/s12293-016-0194-1

10.5267/j.dsl.2018.7.002

10.1007/s10489-017-1016-y

10.5267/j.dsl.2017.6.006

10.1109/TMAG.2014.2342192

10.1111/coin.12197

10.1111/coin.12145

10.1111/coin.12160

10.1111/coin.12166

10.1111/coin.12193

10.1111/coin.12187

10.1111/coin.12159

10.1111/coin.12210

10.1111/coin.12209

10.1016/j.jcde.2016.02.003

10.1016/j.ins.2015.09.009

10.5267/j.dsl.2012.10.005

LiangJJ QuBY SuganthanPN et al. Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2015 competition on learning‐based real‐parameter single objective optimization; 2014. Technical Report 201411A.

TanabeR FukunagaA. Success‐history based parameter adaptation for differential evolution. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) IEEE; 2013:71‐78.

Demšar J, 2006, Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets, Mach Learn Res, 7, 1

Li X, 2011, Hybrid differential evolution and gravitation search algorithm for unconstrained optimization, Int J Phys Sci, 6, 5961

DasS &SuganthanP. Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for CEC2011 Competition on Testing Evolutionary Algorithms on Real World Optimization Problems. Jadavpur University and Nanyang Technological University. Technical Report; 2011.

10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010

Beighter CS, 1976, Applied Geometric Programming

10.1142/S1793005711001986

MirjaliliS Mohd HashimSZ. A New Hybrid PSOGSA Algorithm for Function Optimization. Paper International Conference on Computer and Information Application (ICCIA 2010); 2010.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIA.2010.6141614

10.1109/TEVC.2004.826069

10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006

10.1007/s00521‐015‐1870‐7

10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.004

10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.002

Ganesan T, 2016, Advances in Metaheuristics: Applications in Engineering Systems, 213, 10.1201/9781315297651

PandianVasant IvanZelinka WeberGerhard‐Wilhelm et al. Intelligent Computing & Optimization Conference Proceedings (ICO 2018); 2018; Springer Cham. ISBN 978‐3‐030‐00978‐6

10.3390/en10111703

10.1016/j.jocs.2017.08.010

10.1007/s11276‐019‐01993‐w