A new image fusion performance metric based on visual information fidelity

M.I. Smith, J.P. Heather, Review of image fusion technology in 2005, in: Proceedings of SPIE, 2005, pp. 29–45.

Qu, 2002, Information measure for performance of image fusion, Electronics Letters, 313, 10.1049/el:20020212

Hossny, 2008, Comments on ‘Information measure for performance of image fusion’, Electronics Letters, 1066, 10.1049/el:20081754

Xydeas, 2000, Objective image fusion performance measure, Electronics Letters, 308, 10.1049/el:20000267

G. Piella, A new quality metric for image fusion, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing, 2003, pp. 173–176.

N. Cvejic, A. Łoza, D. Bull, N. Canagarajah, A similarity metric for assessment of image fusion algorithms, in: International Journal of Signal Processing, 2005, pp. 178–182.

Yang, 2008, A novel similarity based quality metric for image fusion, Information Fusion, 9, 156, 10.1016/j.inffus.2006.09.001

Wang, 2004, Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 600, 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861

Chen, 2007, A human perception inspired quality metric for image fusion based on regional information, Information Fusion, 8, 193, 10.1016/j.inffus.2005.10.001

Chen, 2008, A new automated quality assessment algorithm for image fusion, Image and Vision Computing, 1421

Petrovic, 2007, Subjective tests for image fusion evaluation and objective metric validation, Information Fusion, 8, 208, 10.1016/j.inffus.2005.05.001

Sheikh, 2005, An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2117, 10.1109/TIP.2005.859389

Sheikh, 2006, Image information and visual quality, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 430, 10.1109/TIP.2005.859378

Wainwright, 2000, Scale mixtures of Gaussians and the statistics of natural images, 855

Wainwright, 2001, Random cascades on wavelet trees and their use in analyzing and modeling natural images, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 89, 10.1006/acha.2000.0350

H.R. Sheikh, M.F. Sabir, A.C. Bovik, Pixel domain version of VIF. <http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/vifp_release.zip>.

P. Corriveau, A. Webster, Final report from the VQEG on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment, 2000. <http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/>.

A.M. Rohaly et al., Video quality experts group: current results and future directions, visual communications and image processing, in: Proceedings of SPIE, 2000, pp. 742–753.

Srivastava, 2003, On advances in statistical modeling of natural images, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 17, 10.1023/A:1021889010444

ITU- Recommendation, Methodology for subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, BT.500-10, 2000.

Y. Han, image fusion metric. <http://hansy.weebly.com/image-fusion-metric.html>.