A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations

Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee1, Maghsoud Amiri1, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas2, Jurgita Antuchevičienė2
1Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Construction Technology and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Day, 1991

Lewis, 2009, Requirements and incentives for reducing construction vehicle emissions and comparison of nonroad diesel engine emissions sata sources, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135, 341, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000008

El Haggar, 2010

Adams, 2006

Goodhew, 2016

Yan, 2010, Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: a case study of One Peking in Hong Kong, Building and Environment, 45, 949, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.09.014

Zhao, 2015, Risk evaluation of a UHV power transmission construction project based on a cloud model and FCE method for sustainability, Sustainability, 7, 2885, 10.3390/su7032885

Passer, 2012, Assessment of the environmental performance of buildings: a critical evaluation of the influence of technical building equipment on residential buildings, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 1116, 10.1007/s11367-012-0435-6

Giustozzi, 2015, Environmental impact analysis of low-carbon road-foundation layers, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9, 73, 10.1080/15568318.2012.738355

del Caño, 2016, Fuzzy method for analysing uncertainty in the sustainable design of concrete structures, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22, 924, 10.3846/13923730.2014.928361

Yepes, 2015, A cognitive approach for the multi-objective optimization of RC structural problems, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 15, 1024, 10.1016/j.acme.2015.05.001

Ali, 2016, A sustainability assessment framework for bridges – a case study: Victoria and Champlain Bridges, Montreal, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12, 1381

Curiel-Esparza, 2013, Selecting utilities placement techniques in urban underground engineering, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 13, 276, 10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.001

Rafiei, 2016, Sustainability in highrise building design and construction, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 25, 643, 10.1002/tal.1276

Goldenberg, 2007, Systematic evaluation of construction equipment alternatives: case study, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133, 72, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:1(72)

Schabowicz, 2008, Application of artificial neural networks in predicting earthmoving machinery effectiveness ratios, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 8, 73, 10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60123-X

Jrade, 2012, 100

Phogat, 2013, Selection of equipment for construction of a hilly road using multi criteria approach, Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 104, 282, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.121

Hasan, 2013, Productivity and CO2 emission analysis for tower crane utilization on high-rise building projects, Automation in Construction, 31, 255, 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.044

Heidari, 2015, Real-time emissions from construction equipment compared with model predictions, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65, 115, 10.1080/10962247.2014.978485

Kim, 2016, Configuration of earthwork equipment considering environmental impacts, cost and schedule, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22, 73, 10.3846/13923730.2014.897964

Waris, 2014, Criteria for the selection of sustainable onsite construction equipment, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3, 96, 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.06.002

Jato-Espino, 2014, A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction, Automation in Construction, 45, 151, 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.013

Zadeh, 1965, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8, 338, 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Antucheviciene, 2015, Solving civil engineering problems by means of fuzzy and stochastic MCDM methods: current state and future research, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 10.1155/2015/362579

Aliakbari Nouri, 2015, A hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for technology selection, Informatica, 26, 369, 10.15388/Informatica.2015.53

Liao, 2016, Integrated FAHP, ARAS-F and MSGP methods for green supplier evaluation and selection, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22, 651, 10.3846/20294913.2015.1072750

Jaskowski, 2010, Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment, Automation in Construction, 19, 120, 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.014

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, 2016, Developing an MCDM method for robot selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 37, 221, 10.1016/j.rcim.2015.04.007

Ebrahimnejad, 2015, A new interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy model to group decision making for the selection of outsourcing providers, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 49, 256

Önden, 2016, Evaluation of the logistics center locations using a multi-criteria spatial approach, Transport, 10.3846/16484142.2016.1186113

Balin, 2015, A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology based upon the interval type-2 fuzzy sets for evaluating renewable energy alternatives in Turkey, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 10.3846/20294913.2015.1056276

Mardani, 2015, Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–Two decades review from 1994 to 2014, Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 4126, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003

Zardari, 2014

Keršuliene, 2010, Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economic and Management, 11, 243, 10.3846/jbem.2010.12

Diakoulaki, 1995, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method, Computers & Operations Research, 22, 763, 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, 2015, Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica, 26, 435, 10.15388/Informatica.2015.57

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, 2016, Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 11, 358, 10.15837/ijccc.2016.3.2557

Zimmermann, 2010, Fuzzy set theory, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2, 317, 10.1002/wics.82

Wang, 2007, Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 53, 1762, 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.08.037

Chen, 1992

Wang, 2006, On the centroids of fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 919, 10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.006

Ma, 2000, A new approach for defuzzification, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 111, 351, 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00176-6

Chen, 2000, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1, 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, 2016, Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 213, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031

Zavadskas, 2016, Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15, 267, 10.1142/S0219622016500036