A new framework to model and analyze organizational aspect of safety control structure
Tóm tắt
Following the principles of systemic accident models, in this paper we presented a new framework for modeling organizational aspect of hierarchical safety control structure in complex Socio-Technical Systems. In fact, we introduced a Specific Organizational Feedback Control Loop together with a Customized Process Model to narrow down System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) risk analysis method. Clearly, this modification can be able to adjust STPA for deficiency analysis of organizational safety control structure. As a case study, we used this framework in an aircraft maintenance industry, as a sample system. Indeed, we modeled and analyzed this system’s organizational safety control structure by our new framework. We demonstrated that, the new framework, as a modified version of STPA, can accurately model and analyze the organizational control mechanisms.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Coze JCL (2005) Are organisations too complex to be integrated in technical risk assessment and current safety auditing? Saf Sci 43(8):613–638
Dehghan Nejad A (2015) Effect analysis of organizational safety control structure on aircraft reliability in maintenance industry (M.Sc. Dissertation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences)
Dehghan Nejad A, Gholam Niya R, Alibabaee A (2016) The crisis of risk analysis in complex socio-technical systems a literature review Part A: dependency between common risk analysis methods and obsolete accident models. IOH 13(4):62–72
Dong A (2012) Application of CAST and STPA to Railroad safety in China (Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Drury CG (1991). Errors in aviation maintenance: taxonomy and control. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting, vol 35, no 2. SAGE Publications, pp 42–46
Drury CG, Prabhu P, Gramopadhye A (1990). Task analysis of aircraft inspection activities: methods and findings. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual meeting ,vol 34, no 16. SAGE Publications, pp 1181–1185
Dulac, N. (2007) A framework for dynamic safety and risk management modeling in complex engineering systems (Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Holnagle E (2010) From failure to emergence. SINTEF report A14732
IRGC (2010), The emergence of risks: contributing factors, report of international risk governance council, Geneva, ISBN 978-2-9700672-7-6
Ishimatsu T, Leveson N, Fleming C, Katahira M, Miyamoto Y, Nakao H (2011) Multiple controller contributions to hazards. In: 5th IAASS Conference, Versailles, France
Kazaras K, Kirytopoulos K, Rentizelas A (2012) Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment. Saf Sci 50(9):1806–1817
Khanzode VV, Maiti J, Ray PK (2012) Occupational injury and accident research: a comprehensive review. Saf Sci 50(5):1355–1367
Khawaji IA (2012) Developing system-based leading indicators for proactive risk management in the chemical processing industry (Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Kontogiannis T, Malakis S (2012) Recursive modeling of loss of control in human and organizational processes: a systemic model for accident analysis. Accid Anal Prev 48:303–316
Lampe M, Strassner M, Fleisch E (2004) A ubiquitous computing environment for aircraft maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on applied computing, ACM, pp 1586–1592
Leveson N (2004a) Model-based analysis of socio-technical risk
Leveson N (2004b) A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci 42(4):237–270
Leveson N (2011) Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. Mit Press, Cambridge
Loganathan MK, Gandhi MS, Gandhi OP (2015) Functional cause analysis of complex manufacturing systems using structure. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 229(3):533–545
Marx DA, Graeber RC (1994) Human errors in aircraft maintenance. Aviation psychology in practice (A 96-10209 01-53). Avebury Technical, Aldershot, pp 87–104
Marx DA, Westphal JE (2008) Socio-technical probabilistic risk assessment: its application to aviation maintenance. Int J Aviat Psychol 18(1):51–60
McDonald N, Corrigan S, Daly C, Cromie S (2000) Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Saf Sci 34(1):151–176
Nakao H, Katahira M, Miyamoto Y, Leveson N (2011) Safety guided design of crew return vehicle in concept design phase using STAMP/STPA. In: Proceedings of the 5: th IAASS Conference, pp 497–501
Pelegrín L (2012) Integrating Safety into an Engineering Contractor’s System Engineering process using the guidelines of STAMP (M.Sc. Dissertation, Heriot-Watt University)
Phillips EH (1994) Focus on accident prevention key to future airline safety. Aviation Week & Space Technology
Qureshi Z (2008) A review of accident modelling approaches for complex critical socio technical systems. Defense Science and Technology Organisation
Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 27(2):183–213
Reason J (2016) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge, London
Samadi J (2012) Development of a systemic risk management approach for CO2 capture, transport and storage projects (Doctoral Dissertation, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris)
Schönbeck M, Rausand M, Rouvroye J (2010) Human and organisational factors in the operational phase of safety instrumented systems: a new approach. Saf Sci 48(3):310–318
Skjerve AB, Albrechtsen E, Tveiten CK (2008) Defined situations of hazard and accident related to integrated operations on the norwegian continental shelf
Stringfellow MV (2010) Accident analysis and hazard analysis for human and organizational factors (Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Teng B (2010) Assessing risk and prevent accidents in complex system
Turner BA, Pidgeon NF (1997) Man-made disasters, vol 2. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford