Một khung mới để đánh giá sức khỏe hệ sinh thái với sự xem xét về cung ứng bền vững các dịch vụ hệ sinh thái

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Ying Huang1, Xiaoyu Gan1, Y. Feng1, Jin Li2, Shaofei Niu1, Bo Zhou1
1College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, People’s Republic of China
2School of Civil Engineering, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong, 643000, People’s Republic of China

Tóm tắt

Tóm tắt Bối cảnh Việc thiết lập một khung đánh giá sức khỏe hệ sinh thái từ góc độ con người - môi trường là rất quan trọng đối với sự bền vững của cảnh quan. Mặc dù một số nghiên cứu đã cải thiện khung đánh giá bằng cách tích hợp cung hoặc cầu dịch vụ hệ sinh thái (ES), tuy nhiên, việc xem xét cung ứng bền vững các dịch vụ này còn thiếu sót. Mục tiêu Mục tiêu của bài báo này là cải thiện khung phương pháp hiện tại bằng cách tích hợp toàn vẹn sinh thái và cung ứng bền vững các dịch vụ hệ sinh thái nhằm thiết lập một khung đánh giá sức khỏe hệ sinh thái. Phương pháp Một khung đánh giá nâng cao, bao gồm bốn chỉ số: sức sống, tổ chức, khả năng phục hồi và tỷ lệ cung ứng dịch vụ hệ sinh thái, đã được thiết lập từ góc nhìn của các hệ thống con người - môi trường. Sau đó, hiệu suất của khung đánh giá nâng cao này được chứng minh qua một nghiên cứu điển hình tại Trung Quốc từ năm 2000 đến 2020. Kết quả Từ năm 2000 đến 2020, mô hình không gian tổng thể của các giá trị sức khỏe hệ sinh thái tại Trung Quốc cao ở các khu vực ven biển phía nam và đông nam, trong khi các giá trị sức khỏe thấp chủ yếu nằm ở các khu vực phía tây, một phần của Nội Mông và các khu vực đô thị, với xu hướng giảm dần từ đông nam xuống tây bắc. Sự mất cân bằng giữa cung ứng tiềm năng và thực tế của các dịch vụ hệ sinh thái đã góp phần lớn vào sự suy yếu sức khỏe hệ sinh thái khu vực. Trong suốt thời gian nghiên cứu, hệ sinh thái khu vực ở Trung Quốc được phát hiện trong trạng thái không khỏe mạnh hơn so với đánh giá Vigor-Organization-Resilience-Ecosystem services (VORES) truyền thống. Kết luận Khung đánh giá cải thiện mà tích hợp toàn vẹn sinh thái và cung ứng bền vững dịch vụ hệ sinh thái cung cấp một góc nhìn mới để hiểu rõ các đặc tính phức tạp vốn có của các hệ sinh thái và sự kết nối giữa con người và thiên nhiên trong các hệ thống con người - môi trường liên kết. Các kết quả của chúng tôi có thể phục vụ như một tài liệu tham khảo khoa học cho việc quản lý cảnh quan thực tế trong một thế giới đang thay đổi nhằm đạt được sự bền vững của cảnh quan.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bao Z, Shifaw E, Deng C, Sha J, Li X, Hanchiso T, Yang W (2022) Remote sensing-based assessment of ecosystem health by optimizing vigor-organization-resilience model: a case study in Fuzhou City. China Ecol Inform 72:101889

Baró F, Palomo I, Zulian G, Vizcaino P, Haase D, Gómez-Baggethun E (2016) Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 57:405–417

Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Ind 21:17–29

Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F (2014) Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online 34:1–32

Chen W (2022) A multi-scale assessment of ecosystem health based on the pressure-state-response framework: a case in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:29202–29219

Colding J (2007) ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 81:46–55

Comberti C, Thornton TF, Wyllie de Echeverria V, Patterson T (2015) Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems. Glob Environ Chang 34:247–262

Costanza R (1992) Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management 239–256. https://iwlearn.net/resolveuid/cd4a3eb7-087d-429f-9704-7987f26eeba8

Costanza R (2012) Ecosystem health and ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 45:24–29

Costanza R, Mageau M (1999) What is a healthy ecosystem? Aquat Ecol 33:105–115

Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

Cui N, Feng G, Han S, Anfu G (2019) Impact of urbanization on ecosystem health: a case study in Zhuhai, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:4717

Das M, Das A, Pereira P, Mandal A (2021) Exploring the spatio-temporal dynamics of ecosystem health: a study on a rapidly urbanizing metropolitan area of Lower Gangetic Plain. India Ecol Indic 125:107584

Defries R, Foley J, Asner G (2004) Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front Ecol Environ 2:249

Fang S, Yan J, Che M, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Pei H, Zhang H, Xu G, Lin X (2013) Climate change and the ecological responses in Xinjiang, China: Model simulations and data analyses. Quatern Int 311:108–116

Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53:77–88

Gou M, Li L, Ouyang S, Shu C, Xiao W, Wang N, Hu J, Liu C (2022) Integrating ecosystem service trade-offs and rocky desertification into ecological security pattern construction in the Daning river basin of southwest China. Ecol Ind 138:108845

He J, Pan Z, Liu D, Guo X (2019) Exploring the regional differences of ecosystem health and its driving factors in China. Sci Total Environ 673:553–564

Hermoso V, Clavero M (2013) Revisiting ecological integrity 30 years later: non-native species and the misdiagnosis of freshwater ecosystem health. Fish Fish 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00471.x

Howell PE, Muths E, Hossack BR, Sigafus BH, Chandler RB (2018) Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology. Ecology 99:1119–1128

Jia L, Ma Q, Du C, Hu G, Shang C (2020) Rapid urbanization in a mountainous landscape: patterns, drivers, and planning implications. Landscape Ecol 35:2449–2469

Kang P, Chen W, Hou Y, Li Y (2018) Linking ecosystem services and ecosystem health to ecological risk assessment: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Sci Total Environ 636:1442–1454

Lackey R (2001) Values, policy, and ecosystem health. Bioscience 51:437–443

Leviston Z, Walker I, Green M, Price J (2018) Linkages between ecosystem services and human wellbeing: a Nexus Webs approach. Ecol Ind 93:658–668

Li G, Fang C, Wang S (2016) Exploring spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem-service values and hotspots in China. Sci Total Environ 545–546:609–620

Li W, Wang Y, Xie S, Cheng X (2021a) Coupling coordination analysis and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between urbanization and ecosystem health in Chongqing municipality. China Sci Total Environ 791:148311

Li W, Xie S, Wang Y, Huang J, Cheng X (2021b) Effects of urban expansion on ecosystem health in Southwest China from a multi-perspective analysis. J Clean Prod 294:126341

Li W, Wang Y, Xie S, Cheng X (2023) Exploring the regional differences of ecosystem health and its spatial relationships with urban forms in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:62000–62014

Liao S, Wu Y, Wong SW, Shen L (2020) Provincial perspective analysis on the coordination between urbanization growth and resource environment carrying capacity (RECC) in China. Sci Total Environ 730:138964

Liu Y, Yang C, Tan S, Zhou H, Zeng W (2022) An approach to assess spatio-temporal heterogeneity of rural ecosystem health: a case study in Chongqing mountainous area. China Ecol Indic 136:108644

Liu X, Wang Y, Meng X, Zhang C, Chen Z (2023) Improved method for benthic ecosystem health assessment by integrating chemical indexes into multiple biological indicator species—a case study of the Baiyangdian Lake. China J Environ Manag 335:117530

Liyun W, Weibin Y, Zhirong J, Shihong X, Dongjin H (2018) Ecosystem health assessment of Dongshan Island based on its ability to provide ecological services that regulate heavy rainfall. Ecol Ind 84:393–403

Luo Z, Zuo Q, Shao Q (2018) A new framework for assessing river ecosystem health with consideration of human service demand. Sci Total Environ 640–641:442–453

MacDonald AJ, Larsen AE, Plantinga AJ (2019a) Missing the people for the trees: identifying coupled natural–human system feedbacks driving the ecology of Lyme disease. J Appl Ecol 56:354–364

MacDonald AJ, Larsen AE, Plantinga AJ (2019b) Missing the people for the trees: Identifying coupled natural–human system feedbacks driving the ecology of Lyme disease. J Appl Ecol 56:354–364

Mallick J, AlQadhi S, Talukdar S, Pradhan B, Bindajam AA, Islam ARMT, Dajam AS (2021) A novel technique for modeling ecosystem health condition: a case study in Saudi Arabia. Remote Sens 13:1–20

Manea E, Di Carlo D, Depellegrin D, Agardy T, Gissi E (2019) Multidimensional assessment of supporting ecosystem services for marine spatial planning of the Adriatic Sea. Ecol Ind 101:821–837

Nemani RR, Keeling CD, Hashimoto H, Jolly WM, Piper SC, Tucker CJ, Myneni RB, Running SW (2003) Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science 300:1560–1563

Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

Paetzold A, Warren PH, Maltby LL (2010) A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services. Ecol Complex 7:273–281

Pan Z, He J, Liu D, Wang J (2020) Predicting the joint effects of future climate and land use change on ecosystem health in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. China Appl Geogr 124:102293

Pan Z, He J, Liu D, Wang J, Guo X (2021) Ecosystem health assessment based on ecological integrity and ecosystem services demand in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. China Sci Total Environ 774:144837

Paruelo J, Burke I, Lauenroth W (2001) Land-use impact on ecosystem functioning in eastern Colorado, USA. Glob Change Biol 7:631–639

Peng J, Liu Y, Wu J, Lv H, Hu X (2015) Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health: a case study in Shenzhen City, China. Landsc Urban Plan 143:56–68

Peng J, Liu Y, Li T, Wu J (2017) Regional ecosystem health response to rural land use change: a case study in Lijiang City, China. Ecol Ind 72:399–410

Peterson GD (2002) Contagious Disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern. Ecosystems 5:329–338

Rapport D (1989) What constitutes ecosystem health? Perspect Biol Med 33:120–132

Rapport DJ, Maffi L (2011) Eco-cultural health, global health, and sustainability. Ecol Res 26:1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0703-5

Rapport DJ, Costanza R, McMichael AJ (1998) Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol Evol 13:397–402

Rapport DJ, Hildén M (2013) An evolving role for ecological indicators: from documenting ecological conditions to monitoring drivers and policy responses. Ecol Ind 28:10–15

Schirpke U, Candiago S, Egarter Vigl L, Jäger H, Labadini A, Marsoner T, Meisch C, Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2019a) Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 651:928–941

Schirpke U, Egarter Vigl L, Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2019b) Analyzing spatial congruencies and mismatches between supply demand and flow of ecosystem services and sustainable development. Sustainability 11:2227

Schröter M, Barton DN, Remme RP, Hein L (2014) Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: a conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecol Ind 36:539–551

Sharp R, Tallis H, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N (2016): InVEST+ VERSION+ User’s guide. The natural capital project. Stanford university, university of Minnesota, the nature conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund

Shen W, Zheng Z, Pan L, Qin Y, Li Y (2021) A integrated method for assessing the urban ecosystem health of rapid urbanized area in China based on SFPHD framework. Ecol Ind 121:107071

Shi K, Wang H, Yang Q, Wang L, Sun X, Li Y (2019) Exploring the relationships between urban forms and fine particulate (PM2.5) concentration in China: a multi-perspective study. J Clean Prod 231:990–1004

Shu H, Xiao C, Ma T, Sang W (2021) Ecological health assessment of Chinese National Parks based on landscape pattern: a case study in Shennongjia National Park. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:11487

Srinivasan V, Seto KC, Emerson R, Gorelick SM (2013) The impact of urbanization on water vulnerability: A coupled human–environment system approach for Chennai, India. Glob Environ Chang 23:229–239

Su M, Fath BD, Yang Z (2010) Urban ecosystem health assessment: a review. Sci Total Environ 408:2425–2434

Summers JK, Smith LM, Case JL, Linthurst RA (2012) A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services. Ambio 41:327–340

Tao Y, Wang H, Ou W, Guo J (2018) A land-cover-based approach to assessing ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics in the rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta region. Land Use Policy 72:250–258

Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM (2013) Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol Complex 15:114–121

Viña A, McConnell WJ, Yang H, Xu Z, Liu J (2016) Effects of conservation policy on China’s forest recovery. Sci Adv 2:e1500965

Wang Z, Yang Z, Shi H, Han F, Liu Q, Qi J, Lu Y (2020) Ecosystem health assessment of world natural heritage sites based on remote sensing and field sampling verification: bayanbulak as case study. Sustainability 12:1–21

Wang X, Yang C, Liu T, Chen G, Yue H (2022) Assessment spatio-temporal coupling coordination relationship between mountain rural ecosystem health and urbanization in Chongqing municipality, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:48388–48410

Wu J (2013) Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol 28:999–1023

Wu J (2021) Landscape sustainability science (II): core questions and key approaches. Landscape Ecol 36:2453–2485

Wu J, Cheng D, Xu Y, Huang Q, Feng Z (2021) Spatial-temporal change of ecosystem health across China: urbanization impact perspective. J Clean Prod 326:129393

Xiao Y, Guo L, Sang W (2020) Impact of fast urbanization on ecosystem health in mountainous regions of Southwest China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:826

Xiaolin C, Gang L, Tao W, Ningyan H, Limeng FU, Beibei LI (2016) Impacts of grain for green project on soil erosion in luohe river basin of Northern Shaanxi Province, China. Res Soil Water Conserv 23:68–73. https://doi.org/10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2016.05.006

Xie GD, Zhang C, Zhang LM, Chen WH, Li SM (2015) Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. J Nat Res 30:1245–1254

Xie X, Fang B, Xu H, He S, Li X (2021) Study on the coordinated relationship between Urban Land use efficiency and ecosystem health in China. Land Use Policy 102:105235

Yuan WP, Li XL, Liang SL, Cui XF, Dong Lett WJRS (2014) Characterization of locations and extents of afforestation from the Grain for Green Project in China. Remote Sens Lett. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2014.894655

Zhang Z, Peng J, Xu Z, Wang X, Meersmans J (2021) Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: a case study of the Pearl River Delta. China Ecosyst Serv 49:101274

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Thông tin tác giả