A new approach to bad news effects on volatility: the multiple-sign-volume sensitive regime EGARCH model (MSV-EGARCH)
Tóm tắt
In this paper, using daily data for six major international stock market indexes and a modified EGARCH specification, the links between stock market returns, volatility and trading volume are investigated in a new nonlinear conditional variance framework with multiple regimes and volume effects. Volatility forecast comparisons, using the Harvey-Newbold test for multiple forecasts encompassing, seem to demonstrate that the MSV-EGARCH complex threshold structure is able to correctly fit GARCH-type dynamics of the series under study and dominates competing standard asymmetric models in several of the considered stock indexes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akaike H (1978) Time series analysis and control through parametric models. In: Findley DF (ed) Applied time series analysis. Academic, New York
Andersen TG, Bollerslev T (1998) Answering the skeptics: yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. Int Econ Rev 39(4):885–905
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econom 31:307–327
Bollerslev T (1987) A conditional heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. Rev Econ Stat 69:542–547
Curto JD, Pinto JC, Tavares GN (2009) Modelling stock markets’ volatility using GARCH models with normal, student’s t and stable Paretian distributions. Stat Pap. doi:10.1007/s00362-007-0080-5
Diebold FX, Mariano RS (1995) Comparing predictive accuracy. J Bus Econ Stat 13(3):253–263
Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50:987–1007
Engle RF, Ng V (1993) Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. J Finance 48:1749–1778
Fama EF (1965) The behavior of stock prices. J Bus 38:34–105
Glosten L, Jagannanthan R, Runkle R (1993) On the relationship between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess returns on stocks. J Finance 48:1779–1801
Granger C, Ding Z (1995) Some properties of absolute return, an alternative measure of risk. Ann Econ Stat 40:67–91
Hansen PR (2005) A test for superior predictive ability. J Bus Econ Stud 23(4):365–380
Hansen PR, Lunde A (2003) Consistent preordering with an estimated criterion function, with an application to the evaluation and comparison of volatility models. Brown University Working Paper, 2003–01
Hansen P, Lunde A (2005) A forecast comparison of volatility models: does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)? J Appl Econ 20:873–889
Harvey D, Newbold P (2000) Tests for multiple forecast encompassing. J Appl Econ 15:471–482
Jarque CM, Bera AK (1987) A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. Int Stat Rev 55(2):163–172
Liu SM, Brorsen BW (1995) Maximum likelihood estimation of a GARCH-stable model. J Appl Econ 10:273–285
Mandelbrot B (1963) The variation of certain speculative prices. J Bus 36:394–419
Medeiros MC, Veiga AL (2008) Modeling multiple regimes in financial volatility with a flexible coefficient GARCH(1,1) model. Econom Theory 4:4–45
Mittnik S, Paolella MS, Rachev ST (1998) Unconditional and conditional distributional models for the Nikkei Index. Asia-Pac Financ Mark 5:99–1281
Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59(2):347–370
Panorska A, Mittnik S, Rachev ST (1995) Stable ARCH models for financial time series. Appl Math Lett 8:33–37
Patton AJ (2006) Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies. Research Paper Series 175, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–64
Tavares AB, Curto JD, Tavares GN (2007) Modelling heavy tails and asymmetry using ARCH-type models with stable Paretian distributions. Nonlinear Dyn 51(1–2):231–243
Wagner N, Marsh TA (2005) Surprise volume and heteroskedasticity in equity market returns. Quantitative Finance 5:153–168