A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks

Amgoud, L., Besnard, Ph.: Bridging the gap between abstract argumentation systems and logic. In: International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM’09), pp. 12–27 (2009)

Amgoud, L., Besnard, Ph.: A formal analysis of logic-based argumentation systems. In: International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM’10), pp. 42–55 (2010)

Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. J. Autom. Reason. 29(2), 125–169 (2002)

Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 34, 197–216 (2002)

Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artif. Intell. J. 173, 413–436 (2009)

Amgoud, L., Serrurier, M.: Agents that argue and explain classifications. J. Auton. Agents Multi-Agents Syst. 16, 187–209 (2008)

Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Repairing preference-based argumentation systems. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’09), pp. 665–670 (2009)

Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Generalizing stable semantics by preferences. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’10), pp. 39–50 (2010)

Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: On the role of preferences in argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’10), pp. 219–222 (2010)

Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., LeBerre, D.: Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’96), pp. 400–403 (1996)

Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’00), pp. 31–38 (2000)

Amgoud, L., Caminada, M., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie, M.C., Prakken, H.: Towards a consensual formal model: inference part. Technical report. In: Deliverable D2.2: Draft Formal Semantics for Inference and Decision-Making. ASPIC Project (2004)

Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: Making decisions through preference-based argumentation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’08), pp. 113–123 (2008)

Amgoud, L., Besnard, Ph., Vesic, S.: Identifying the core of logic-based argumentation systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’11) (2011)

Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. J. 171, 675–700 (2007)

Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: Scc-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. J. 168, 162–210 (2005)

Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429–448 (2003)

Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’93), pp. 411–419 (1993)

Besnard, Ph., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press (2008)

Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Arguing for decisions: a qualitative model of decision making. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’96), pp. 98–105 (1996)

Brewka, G.: Preferred subtheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’89), pp. 1043–1048 (1989)

Brewka, G., Eiter, T.: Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs. Artif. Intell. J. 109, 297–356 (1999)

Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Truszczynski, M.: Preferences and nonmonotonic reasoning. AI Mag. 29(4), 69–78 (2008)

Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artif. Intell. J. 171(5–6), 286–310 (2007)

Caminada, M.W.A.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’06), pp. 121–130 (2006)

Cayrol, C.: On the relation between argumentation and non-monotonic coherence-based entailment. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’95), pp. 1443–1448 (1995)

Cayrol, C., Royer, V., Saurel, C.: Management of preferences in assumption-based reasoning. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 682, 13–22 (1993)

Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P., Amgoud, L.: Extending argumentation to make good decisions. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT’09). LNCS 5783, pp. 225–236 (2009)

Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. J. 77, 321–357 (1995)

Dung, P.M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Computing ideal skeptical argumentation. Artif. Intell. J. 171, 642–674 (2007)

Dunne, P.: Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints. Artif. Intell. J. 171(10–15), 701–729 (2007)

Elvang-Gøransson, M., Fox, J., Krause, P.: Acceptability of arguments as ‘logical uncertainty’. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU’93), pp. 85–90 (1993)

Kaci, S.: Refined preference-based argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA’10), pp. 299–310 (2010)

Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values. J. of Approx. Reas. 48(3), 730–751 (2008)

Kaci, S., van der Torre, L., Weydert, E.: Acyclic argumentation: attack = conflict + preference. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’06), pp. 725–726 (2006)

Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. J. Artif. Intell. 104, 1–69 (1998)

Martinez, G., Garcia, A., Simari, G.: On defense strength of blocking defeaters in admissible sets. In: Proceedings of KSEM’07. LNAI 4798, pp. 140–152 (2007)

Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. J. 173(9–10), 901–934 (2009)

Modgil, S., Prakken, H.: Revisiting preferences and argumentation. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’11), pp. 1021–1026 (2011)

Mozina, M., Zabkar, J., Bratko, I.: Argument based machine learning. Artif. Intell. J. 171(10–15), 922–937 (2007)

Pollock, J.: How to reason defeasibly. Artif. Intell. J. 57, 1–42 (1992)

Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J. Log. Comput. 15, 1009–1040 (2005)

Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. J. of Arg. and Comp. 1, 93–124 (2010)

Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. J. Appl. Non-class. Log. 7, 25–75 (1997)

Rescher, N., Manor, R.: On inference from inconsistent premises. J. Theory Decis. 1, 179–219 (1970)

Simari, G.R., Loui, R.P.: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artif. Intell. J. 53, 125–157 (1992)

Sycara, K.: Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory Decis. 28, 203–242 (1990)

Tarski, A.: On Some Fundamental Concepts of Metamathematics. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematic. Edited and Translated by J. H. Woodger. Oxford University Press (1956)