A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
McFarland, J., Stark, P. & Cui, J. Trends in High School Dropout and Completion Rates in the United States: 2013 (US Department of Education, 2016).
Autor, D. H. Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”. Science 344, 843–851 (2014).
Fischer, C. S. & Hout, M. Century of Difference (Russell Sage Foundation, 2006).
Rose, H. & Betts, J. R. The effect of high school courses on earnings. Rev. Econ. Stat. 86, 497–513 (2004).
Patton, G. C. et al. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet 387, 2423–2478 (2016).
Crosnoe, R. Fitting In, Standing Out: Navigating the Social Challenges of high School to Get an Education (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
Sutton, A., Langenkamp, A. G., Muller, C. & Schiller, K. S. Who gets ahead and who falls behind during the transition to high school? Academic performance at the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender. Soc. Probl. 65, 154–173 (2018).
Adelman, C. The Toolbox Revisited: Paths to Degree Completion from High School through College (US Department of Education, 2006).
Schiller, K. S., Schmidt, W. H., Muller, C. & Houang, R. Hidden disparities: how courses and curricula shape opportunities in mathematics during high school. Equity Excell. Educ. 43, 414–433 (2010).
Walton, G. M. & Wilson, T. D. Wise interventions: psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychol. Rev. 125, 617–655 (2018).
Yeager, D. S. & Walton, G. M. Social–psychological interventions in education: they’re not magic. Rev. Educ. Res. 81, 267–301 (2011).
Dweck, C. S. & Yeager, D. S. Mindsets: a view from two eras. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 481–496 (2019).
Yeager, D. S. et al. Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: the case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. J. Educ. Psychol. 108, 374–391 (2016).
Aronson, J. M., Fried, C. B. & Good, C. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38, 113–125 (2002).
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H. & Dweck, C. S. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev. 78, 246–263 (2007).
Paunesku, D. et al. Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychol. Sci. 26, 784–793 (2015).
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N. & Brzustoski, P. Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science 324, 400–403 (2009).
Good, C., Aronson, J. & Inzlicht, M. Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: an intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 24, 645–662 (2003).
Benner, A. D. The transition to high school: current knowledge, future directions. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 23, 299–328 (2011).
Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M. & Finkel, E. J. Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychol. Bull. 139, 655–701 (2013).
Greenberg, M. T. & Abenavoli, R. Universal interventions: fully exploring their impacts and potential to produce population-level impacts. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 10, 40–67 (2017).
Singal, A. G., Higgins, P. D. R. & Waljee, A. K. A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 5, e45 (2014).
Bloom, H. S. & Michalopoulos, C. When is the story in the subgroups? Strategies for interpreting and reporting intervention effects for subgroups. Prev. Sci. 14, 179–188 (2013).
Reardon, S. F. & Stuart, E. A. Editors’ introduction: theme issue on variation in treatment effects. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 10, 671–674 (2017).
Stuart, E. A., Bell, S. H., Ebnesajjad, C., Olsen, R. B. & Orr, L. L. Characteristics of school districts that participate in rigorous national educational evaluations. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 10, 168–206 (2017).
Gopalan, M. & Tipton, E. Is the National Study of Learning Mindsets nationally-representative? https://psyarxiv.com/dvmr7/ (2018).
Dynarski, S. M. For Better Learning in College Lectures, Lay Down The Laptop and Pick Up a Pen (The Brookings Institution, 2017).
Slavin, R. E. Best-evidence synthesis: an alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educ. Res. 15, 5–11 (1986).
Hill, C. J., Bloom, H. S., Black, A. R. & Lipsey, M. W. Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Dev. Perspect. 2, 172–177 (2008).
Kraft, M. Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/mkraft/files/kraft_2018_interpreting_effect_sizes.pdf (Brown University, 2018).
Hanushek, E. Valuing teachers: how much is a good teacher worth? Educ. Next 11, 40–45 (2011).
Boulay, B. et al. The Investing in Innovation Fund: Summary of 67 Evaluations (US Department of Education, 2018).
Yeager, D. S. National Study of Learning Mindsets - One Year Impact Analysis. https://osf.io/tn6g4 (2017).
Alexander, L. Every Student Succeeds Act. 114th Congress Public Law No. 114-95 https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177/text (US Congress, 2015).
Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M. & Freeland, E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347, 262–265 (2015).
Carroll, J. M., Muller, C., Grodsky, E. & Warren, J. R. Tracking health inequalities from high school to midlife. Soc. Forces 96, 591–628 (2017).
Bloom, H. S., Raudenbush, S. W., Weiss, M. J. & Porter, K. Using multisite experiments to study cross-site variation in treatment effects: a hybrid approach with fixed intercepts and a random treatment coefficient. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 10, 817–842 (2017).
Hahn, P. R., Murray, J. S. & Carvalho, C. Bayesian regression tree models for causal inference: regularization, confounding, and heterogeneous effects. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09523 (2017).
Dorie, V., Hill, J., Shalit, U., Scott, M. & Cervone, D. Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition. Statist. Sci. 34, 43–68 (2019).
Kaplan, R. M. More Than Medicine: The Broken Promise of American Health (Harvard Univ. Press, 2019).
Yeager, D. S., Dahl, R. E. & Dweck, C. S. Why interventions to influence adolescent behavior often fail but could succeed. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 101–122 (2018).
Dahl, R. E., Allen, N. B., Wilbrecht, L. & Suleiman, A. B. Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature 554, 441–450 (2018).
Yeager, D. S. The National Study of Learning Mindsets, [United States], 2015–2016 (ICPSR 37353). 10.3886/ICPSR37353.v1 (2019).
Tipton, E., Yeager, D. S., Iachan, R. & Schneider, B. in Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment (ed. Lavrakas, P. J.) (Wiley, 2019).
Tipton, E. How generalizable is your experiment? An index for comparing experimental samples and populations. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 39, 478–501 (2014).
Robins, R. W. & Pals, J. L. Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self. Identity 1, 313–336 (2002).