A multi-objective mathematical model to select fleets and maritime routes in short sea shipping: a case study in Chile
Tóm tắt
This paper proposes a mathematical model for intermodal chains with seaborne transport, in which the optimization of a multi-objective model enables conflicting objectives to be handled simultaneously. Through the assessment of ‘door-to-door’ transport in terms of costs, time, and environmental impact, the most suitable maritime route and the optimized fleet are jointly proposed to maximize the opportunities for success of intermodal chains versus trucking. The NSGA-II algorithm is applied to resolve the model. The Pareto fronts obtained not only permit decision-making in the short-term but also enable long-term strategies to be defined according to the behaviour of these frontiers when sensitivity analysis is undertaken. A real-life case in Chile is studied to test the usefulness of the model. Aside from identifying the most suitable Motorway of the Sea with its optimized fleet for Chile, the application case has provided several significant findings to promote the intermodal option regardless of its location.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Brooks MR, Frost JD (2004) Short sea shipping: a Canadian perspective. Maritime Policy Manag 31(4):393–407
Brooks MR, Sánchez R, Wilmsmeier G (2014) Developing short sea shipping in South America—looking beyond traditional perspectives. Ocean Yearb 28:495–526
Brooks M, Wilmsmeier G (2017) A Chilean maritime highway: is it a possible domestic transport option? Transp Res Rec 2611:32–40
Puckett S, Hensher D, Brooks M, Trifts V (2011) Preferences for alternative short sea shipping opportunities. Transp Res Part E 47(2011):182–189
Bendall H, Brooks M (2011) Short sea shipping: lessons for or from Australia. Int J Shipp Transp Log (IJSTL) 3(4):2011
Chang Y, Lee P, Kim H (2010) Optimization model for transportation of container cargoes considering short sea shipping and external cost. South Korean Case’ Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2166(1):99–108
Lee P, Hu KC, Chen T (2010) External costs of domestic container transportation: short-sea shipping versus trucking in Taiwan. Transp Rev A Transl Transdiscip 30(3):315–335
Suárez-Alemán A, Trujillo L, Medda F (2015) Short Sea shipping and Intermodal competition’. Maritime Policy Manag 42(4):317–334
Baird A (2007) The economics of Motorways of the Sea. Maritime Policy & Management 34(4):287–310
Gesé X, Baird A (2013) Motorways of the sea policy in Europe. Maritime Policy Manag 40(1):10–26
Medda F, Trujillo L (2010) Short Sea Shipping: an analysis of its determinants. Maritime Policy Manag 37(3):285–303
Cullinane K, Cullinane S (2013) Atmospheric emissions from shipping: The need for regulation and approaches to compliance. Transp Rev A Transnat Transdiscip 33(4):377–401
Bengtsson S, Fridell E, Andersson K (2014) Fuels for short sea shipping: comparative assessment with focus on environment impact. Proc IMechE 228(1):44–54
Hjelle MH (2010) Short sea shipping’s green label at risk. Transp Rev A Transl Transdiscip 30(5):617–640
Hjelle MH, Fridell E (2012) When is short sea shipping environmentally competitive? In: Oosthuizen J (ed) Environmental health – emerging issues and practice, Croatia: InTech
Daganzo C (2005) ‘Many to many distribution’ in Daganzo C. Logistic systems Analysis. Springer, Berlin
Martínez-López A, Caamaño P, Castro L (2015) Definition of optimal fleets for Sea Motorways: the case of France and Spain on the Atlantic coast. Int J Shipp Transp Log 7(1):89–113
Martínez-López A, Caamaño P, Míguez M (2016) Influence of external costs on the optimisation of container fleets by operating under motorways of the sea conditions. Int J Shipp Transp Log 8(6):653–686
Wang S, Meng Q (2012) Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transp Res Part E 48(2012):701–714
Kim J-G, Kim H-J, Lee PT-W (2013) Optimising containership speed and fleet size under a carbon tax and an emission trading scheme’. Int J Ship Transp Log 5(6):571–590
Chandra S, Christiansen M, Fagerholt K (2016) Combined fleet deployment and inventory management in roll-on/roll-off shipping. Transp Res Part E 92(2016):43–55
Mansouri SA, Lee H, Aluko O (2015) Multi-objective decision supports to enhance environmental sustainability in maritime shipping: a review and future directions. Transp Res Part E 78(2015):3–18
Wong EY, Yeung HS, Lau HY (2009) Immunity-based hybrid evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization in global container repositioning. Eng Appl Artif Intell 22(6):842–854
Wong EYC, Lau HY, Mak KL (2010) Immunity-based evolutionary algorithm for optimal global container repositioning in liner shipping. Oper Res Decis Theory OR Spectr 32(3):739–763
Chen G, Govindan K, Golias MM (2013) Reducing truck emissions at container terminals in a low carbon economy: proposal of a queueing-based bio-objective model for optimizing truck arrival pattern. Transp Res Part E 55(2013):3–22
Hu Q, Hu Z, Du Y (2014) Berth and quay-crane allocation problem considering fuel consumption and emissions from vessels. Comput Ind Eng 70:1–10
Usabiaga J, Castells M, Martínez X, Olcer A (2013) A simulation model for road and maritime environmental performance assessment. J Environ Protect 4(7):683–693
Lupi M, Farina A, Orsi D, Pratelli A (2017) The capability of Motorways of the Sea of being competitive against road transport. The case of the Italian mainland and Sicily. J Transp Geograph 58:9–21
Baykasoglu A, Subulan K (2016) A multi-objective sustainable load planning model for intermodal transportation networks with a real-life application. Transp Res Part E 95(2016):207–247
Martínez-López A, Caamaño P, Chica M, Trujillo L (2018) Optimization of a container vessel fleet and its propulsion plant to articulate sustainable intermodal chains versus road transport. Transp Res Part D 59(2018):134–147
Ntziabchristos and Samaras (2012) EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2009 (updated May, 2012). Chapter: Passenger cars, light duty trucks, heavy duty vehicles including buses and motorbikes. The European Environment Agency
Jiang L, Kronbak J (2012) The model of maritime external costs Work Package 1, report nº06, June 2012. Project n 2010 56:Emissionsbeslutingsstottesystem.Copenhagen: University of Southern Denmark
Maibach M, Schreyer C, Sutter D, Essen HPV, Boon BH, Smokers R, Schrote A, Doll C, Pawlowska BBM (2008) Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector. CE Delft, Delft
Kristensen H (2012) Energy demand and exhaust gas emissions of ships. Work Package 2 of Project Emissionsbeslutningsstottesystem. Copenhagen: Technical University of Denmark
Lützen M, Kristensen H (2012) A model for prediction of propulsion power and emissions tankers and bulk carriers. In: Proceedings of World Maritime Technology Conference, 2012. Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Caamaño P, Tedin R, Paz-Lopez A, Becerra JA (2010) JEAF: a Java evolutionary algorithm framework. In: 2010 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp 1–8
Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evolut Comput 8(2):173–195
Grosso M, Lynce A, Silla A (2010) Short Sea Shipping, intermodality and parameters influencing pricing policies: the Mediterranean case. NETNOMICS Econ Res Electron Netw 11(1):47–67
Hjelle MH (2014) Atmospheric emissions of short sea shipping compared to road transport though the peaks and troughs of short-term market cycles. Transp Rev A Transl Transdiscip 34(3):379–395
Jiang L, Kronbak J, Christensen L (2014) The cost and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transp Res Part D 28:19–27
Lagoudis IN, Fragkos SN, Litinas NA (2010) Estimating optimum container and vessel fleet sizes in a cyclic liner service using a holistic approach. Int J Shipp Transp Log 2(1):4–21
Martínez-López A, Munín DA, García-Alonso L (2015) A multi-criteria decision method for the analysis of the motorways of the sea: the application to the case of France and Spain on the Atlantic coast. Maritime Policy Manag 42(6):608–631