A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints
Tóm tắt
Publication bias and related bias in meta‐analysis is often examined by visually checking for asymmetry in funnel plots of treatment effect against its standard error. Formal statistical tests of funnel plot asymmetry have been proposed, but when applied to binary outcome data these can give false‐positive rates that are higher than the nominal level in some situations (large treatment effects, or few events per trial, or all trials of similar sizes). We develop a modified linear regression test for funnel plot asymmetry based on the efficient score and its variance, Fisher's information. The performance of this test is compared to the other proposed tests in simulation analyses based on the characteristics of published controlled trials. When there is little or no between‐trial heterogeneity, this modified test has a false‐positive rate close to the nominal level while maintaining similar power to the original linear regression test (‘Egger’ test). When the degree of between‐trial heterogeneity is large, none of the tests that have been proposed has uniformly good properties. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Egger M, 2003, How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study, Health Technology Assessment, 7, 10.3310/hta7010
DeeksJJ HigginsJPT AltmanDG. Analysing and presenting results. In Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 Alderson P Green S Higgins J (eds) [updated March 2004];http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/handbook.pdf(accessed 17 January 2005)
Irwig L, 1998, Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Graphical test is itself biased (Letter), British Medical Journal, 316, 470
SilagyC LancasterT SteadL MantD FowlerG.Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3 2004.
Steichen TJ, 1998, sbe19.1: tests for publication bias in meta‐analysis, Stata Technical Bulletin, 44, 3
Whitehead J, 1992, The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials
Maldonado G, 1997, The importance of critically interpreting simulation studies, Epidemiology, 8, 453
Hilbe J, 1995, sg44: random number generators, Stata Technical Bulletin, 28, 20
Hilbe J, 1998, sg44.1: corrections to random number generators, Stata Technical Bulletin, 41, 23
StataCorp, 2003, Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0
Sackett DL, 1996, Down with odds ratios!, Evidence‐Based Medicine, 1, 164
SterneJAC EggerM. High false positive rate for trim and fill method (electronic letter).http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/320/7249/15742000(accessed 17 January 2005)