A mixed reality tool for end-users participation in early creative design tasks

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 13 Số 1 - Trang 163-182 - 2019
Santosh Maurya1, Kengo Arai1, Koyo Moriya1, Pierre-Antoine Arrighi2, Céline Mougenot3
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Paris, France
3Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, R.J., Hannaford, B.: Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(3), 465–474 (1999)

Alexiou, K., Zamenopoulos, T., Johnson, J., Gilbert, S.: Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: some preliminary results. Des. Stud. 30(6), 623–647 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.002

Arrighi, P.A., Masson, P.L., Weil, B., LeMasson, P., Weil, B.: Addressing constraints creatively: how new design software helps solve the dilemma of originality and feasibility. Creat. Innov. Manag. 24(2), 247–260 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12082

Arrighi, P.A., Maurya, S., Arai, K., Moriya, K., Mougenot, C.: A mixed reality system for kansei-based co-design of highly-customized products. J. Integr. Des. Process Sci. 20(2), 47–60 (2016)

Arrighi, P.A., Maurya, S., Maurya, S.: Towards co-designing with users: a mixed reality tool for Kansei Engineering. In: Bouras, A., Eynard, B., Foufou, S., Thoben, K.D. (eds.) Proceedings of Lifecycle Management Era Internet Things 12th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, PLM 2015, Doha, Qatar, October 19–21, 2015, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 751–760. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33111-9_68

Arrighi, P.A., Mougenot, C.: Towards user empowerment in product design: a mixed reality tool for interactive virtual prototyping. J. Intell. Manuf. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1276-0

Balters, S., Steinert, M.: Capturing emotion reactivity through physiology measurement as a foundation for affective engineering in engineering design science and engineering practices. J. Intell. Manuf. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1145-2

Bassily, D., Georgoulas, C., Guettler, J., Linner, T., Bock, T.: Intuitive and adaptive robotic arm manipulation using the leap motion controller. In: ISR/Robotik 2014

41st International Symposium on Robotics Proceedings, pp. 1-7. VDE (2014)

Bordegoni, M., Cugini, U., Caruso, G., Polistina, S.: Mixed prototyping for product assessment: a reference framework. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 3(3), 177–187 (2009)

Bordegoni, M., Ferrise, F.: Designing interaction with consumer products in a multisensory virtual reality environment: this paper shows how virtual reality technology can be used instead of physical artifacts or mock-ups for the new product and evaluation of its usage. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 8(1), 51–64 (2013)

Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

Buchenau, M., Suri, J.F.: Experience prototyping. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, DIS ’00, pp. 424–433. ACM, New York (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802

Carlile, P.R.: A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4), 442–455 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953

Carulli, M., Bordegoni, M., Cugini, U.: An approach for capturing the voice of the customer based on virtual prototyping. J. Intell. Manuf. 24(5), 887–903 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0662-5

Choi, S.H., Cheung, H.H.: A versatile virtual prototyping system for rapid product development. Comput. Ind. 59(5), 477–488 (2008)

Chu, C.C.P., Dani, T.H., Gadh, R.: Multi-sensory user interface for a virtual-reality-based computeraided design system. Comput. Des. 29(10), 709–725 (1997)

Davis, S.: Future perfect: a startling vision of the future we should be managing now. AddisonWesley, Reading (1987)

Donati, C., Vignoli, M.: How tangible is your prototype? Designing the user and expert interaction. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 9(2), 107–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0232-5

Elizabeth, B.N.S., William, C.T.: Harnessing people’s creativity: ideation and expression through visual communication. In: Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development, vol. 137 (2002)

Ferrise, F., Graziosi, S., Bordegoni, M.: Prototyping strategies for multisensory product experience engineering. J. Intell. Manuf. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1163-0

Hart, C.W.: Mass customization: conceptual underpinnings, opportunities and limits. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 6(2), 36–45 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239510084932

Heydarian, A., Carneiro, J.P., Gerber, D., Becerik-Gerber, B., Hayes, T., Wood, W.: Immersive virtual environments versus physical built environments: a benchmarking study for building design and user-built environment explorations. Autom. Constr. 54, 116–126 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.020

Hornecker, E., Buur, J.: Getting a grip on tangible interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems—CHI ’06, p. 437 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124838

Huyett, W., Viguerie, S.: Extreme competition. McKinsey Q. 1, 46–57 (2005)

Hvam, L.: Mass customisation in the electronics industry: based on modular products and product configuration. Int. J. Mass Cust. 1(4), 410 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMASSC.2006.010442

Jiao, J., Ma, Q., Tseng, M.M.M.M.: Towards high value-added products and services: mass customization and beyond. Technovation 23(10), 809–821 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00023-8

Kahn, B.: Variety: from consumer’s perspective. In: Ho, T., Tang, C. (eds.) Product Variety Management: Research Advances, pp. 19–37. Springer, New York (1998)

Kuchenbecker, K.J., Fiene, J., Niemeyer, G.: Improving contact realism through event-based haptic feedback. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 12(2), 219–230 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.32

Lanzotti, A., Tarantino, P.: Kansei engineering approach for total quality design and continuous innovation. TQM J. 20(4), 324–337 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730810881311

Lewis, J.R.: Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies. ACM SIGCHI Bull. 23(1), 78–81 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1145/122672.122692

Lihra, T., Buehlmann, U., Beauregard, R.: Mass customisation of wood furniture as a competitive strategy. Int. J. Mass Cust. 2(3–4), 200–215 (2008)

Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22(140), 55 (1932)

Lin, T., Omata, M., Hu, W., Imamiya, A.: Do physiological data relate to traditional usability indexes? In: Proceeding OZCHI ’05 Proceeding of 17th Australia Conference on Computer–Human interaction Citizens Online Considerations Today Future, pp. 1–10 (2005)

Magretta, J.: The power of virtual integration: an interview with Dell Computers’ Michael Dell. Harvard Business Review (1998)

Medyna, G., Nonsiri, S., Coatanéa, E., Bernardb, A.: Modelling, Evaluation and simulation during the early design stages: toward the development of an approach limiting the need for specific knowledge. J. Integr. 16(3), 111–131 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2012-0006

Nagamachi, M.: Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 15(1), 3–11 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00052-5

Nagamachi, M.: Perspectives and the new trend of Kansei /affective engineering. TQM J. 20(4), 290–298 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730810881285

Nagamachi, M.: Kansei/Affective Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)

Nagamachi, M., Lokman, A.M.: Innovations of Kansei Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)

Ng, L.X., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.C.: Conceptual design using functional 3D models in augmented reality. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 9(2), 115–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0207-6

Ogi, T., Tateyama, Y., Haruyama, S.: Education on human centered design using virtual environment. In: Volume 3 30th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference Parts A B, pp. 667–672. ASME (2010). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28624

Piller, F.T.F.: Observations on the present and future of mass customization. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. 19(4), 630–636 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-008-9042-z

Ross, P.R., Wensveen, S.A.G.: Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. Int. J. Des. 4(2), 3–13 (2010)

Sanders, E.B.N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4(1), 5–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Sarkar, P., Chakrabarti, A.: Assessing design creativity. Des. Stud. 32(4), 348–383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002

Shah, S.S.G.S.S., Robinson, I.: Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. Int. J. Technol. 23(1), 131–137 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462307051677

Slater, M., Linakis, V., Usoh, M., Kooper, R., Street, G.: Immersion, presence, and performance in virtual environments: an experiment with tri-dimensional chess. In: ACM virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), vol. 163. ACM Press, New York, NY (1996)

Tideman, M., van der Voort, M.C., van Houten, F.J.A.M.: A new product design method based on virtual reality, gaming and scenarios. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 2(4), 195–205 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-008-0049-1

Toma, M.I., Gîrbacia, F., Antonya, C.: A comparative evaluation of human interaction for design and assembly of 3D CAD models in desktop and immersive environments. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 6(3), 179–193 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0144-1

Torres, A.G.D., Galvis, I.C.G.: Innovation and creativity in process control and manufacturing. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 11(2), 173–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0258-8

Tseng, M.M., Piller, F.T.: The Customer Centric Enterprise. Springer, New York (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55460-5

Tullis, T., Albert, W.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Newnes (2013)

Van der Vegte, W.F.W., Horváth, I.: Consideration and modeling of use processes in computer-aided conceptual design: a state of the art review. J. Integr. Des. Process Sci. 6(2), 25–59 (2002)

Wan, Z., Bullard, S.S.H.S.S.H.: Firm size and competitive advantage in the US upholstered, wood household furniture industry. For. Prod. J. 58(1–2), 91–96 (2008)

Wang, G.G.: Definition and review of virtual prototyping. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2(3), 232 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1526508

Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., Pardasani, A.: Collaborative conceptual designstate of the art and future trends. Comput. Des. 34(13), 981–996 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00157-9

Wright, P., Wallace, J., McCarthy, J.: Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 15(4), 1–21 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460360

Yanagisawa, H., Fukuda, S.: Development of interactive industrial design support system considering customer’s evaluation. JSME Int J. Ser. C 47(2), 762–769 (2004)

Yoshino, K., Matsuoka, K.: Personal adaptive method to assess mental tension during daily life using heart rate variability. Methods Inf. Med. 51(1), 39–44 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3414/ME11-01-0027

Youmans, R.J.: The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation. Des. Stud. 32(2), 115–138 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.08.001