A methodology on how to create a real-life relevant risk profile for a given nanomaterial
Tài liệu tham khảo
Beumer K., 2013, Sci. Public Policy, 40, 628, 10.1093/scipol/sct016
Sargent J.F., 2016, Nanotechnology: A Policy Primer
Subramanian V., 2016, J. Nanopart. Res., 18, 1, 10.1007/s11051-016-3375-4
Aruna K., 2015, i-Manager’s J. Future Eng. Technol., 11, 25
Savolainen K., 2013, Nanosafety in Europe 2015–2025: Towards Safe and Sustainable Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology Innovations
Krug H.F., 2014, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 53, 12304
Bleeker E.A.J., 2013, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 65, 119, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.11.007
Hankin S.M., 2016, Managing Risk in Nanotechnology, 29, 10.1007/978-3-319-32392-3_3
Aithal P.S., 2016, Nanotechnology Innovations and Commercialization–Opportunities, Challenges & Reasons for Delay, 10.5815/ijem.2016.06.02
Justo-Hanani R., 2015, Res. Policy, 44, 1527, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.001
Wijnhoven S.W.P., 2009, Nanotoxicology, 3, 109, 10.1080/17435390902725914
Mattsson M.-O., 2016, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 84, 105, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.12.008
Hutchison J.E., 2016, The Road to Sustainable Nanotechnology: Challenges, Progress and Opportunities
Schulte P.A., 2016, J. Nanopart. Res., 18, 1, 10.1007/s11051-016-3459-1
Clark K., 2012, J. Nanopart. Res., 14, 970, 10.1007/s11051-012-0970-x
NIOSH, 2005, NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin
Aitken R.A., 2011, Specific Advice on Exposure Assessment and Hazard/Risk Characterisation for Nanomaterials under REACH (RIP-oN 3)-Final Project Report
Eastlake A.C., 2016, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 13, 708, 10.1080/15459624.2016.1167278
Van Duuren-Stuurman B., 2012, Ann. Occup. Hyg., mer113
ISO, 2014, ISO/TS 12901-2:2014. Nanotechnologies—Occupational Risk Management Applied to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part 2: Use of the Control Banding Approach
ECETOC AISBL, 2014, Targeted Risk Assessment User Guide for the Integrated Tool TRAM Version 3 Update to Version 3.1
SCENIHR, 2010, Opinion on the Scientific Basis for the Definition of the Term “Nanomaterial”
Environment Agency Austria, 2014, Methodology for Identification and Assessment of Substances for Inclusion in the List of Restricted Substances (Annex II) under the RoHS2 Directive
Eisenberg D.A., 2015, Nanomaterials in the Environment, 383, 10.1061/9780784414088.ch15
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2009, Guidance in a Nutshell — Chemical Safety
European Chemicals Agency, 2012, Chemical Safety Report — An Illustrative Example
European Chemicals Agency, 2015, Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, 12
REACHnano Consortium, 2015, Guidance on Available Methods for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials
CEFIC (AISBL), 2010, REACH Practical Guide on Exposure Assessment and Communication in the Supply Chains Part IV: Supplement Exposure Estimation
Gerritsen-Ebben R., 2010, NANEX — Development of Exposure Scenarios for Manufactured Nanomaterials; Occupational Exposure Scenarios
Beaudrie C.E.H., 2011, J. Nanopart. Res., 13, 1477, 10.1007/s11051-011-0234-1
Pereira A., 2017, Occupational Safety and Hygiene V, 323, 10.1201/9781315164809-60
Brouwer D.H., 2012, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 56, 506
ISO, 2014, ISO/TS 12901-2:2014. Nanotechnologies — Guidelines for occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials — Part 2
Liguori Biase, 2016, NanoImpact, 2, 1, 10.1016/j.impact.2016.04.002
Van Duuren-Stuurman, 2012, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 56, 525
OECD, 2015, Harmonized Tiered Approach to Measure and Assess the Potential Exposure to Airborne Emissions of Engineered Nano-Objects and their Agglomerates and Aggregates at Workplaces
OECD, 2015, Guidance Manual owards the Integration of Risk Assessment into Life Cycle Assessment of Nano-Enabled Applications
European Chemicals Agency, 2010, Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Part A: Introduction to the Guidance Document
European Commission, 2013, Guidance on the Protection of the Health and Safety of Workers from the Potential Risks Related to Nanomaterials — Guidance for Employers and Health and Safety Practitioners
Hristozov D., 2016, Environ. Int., 95, 36, 10.1016/j.envint.2016.07.016
Stone V., 2014, Part. Fibre Toxicol., 11, 1, 10.1186/1743-8977-11-9
Som C., 2014, LICARA Guidelines for the Sustainable Competitiveness of Nanoproducts
Bos P.M.J., 2015, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 12, 15007, 10.3390/ijerph121214961
Sikorová L., 2016, Building Exposure Scenarios for Safety Management of Engineered Nanomaterials
Malsch I., 2015, Environ. Syst. Decis., 35, 54, 10.1007/s10669-015-9539-4
Bremmer H.J., 2006, Cosmetics Fact Sheet. To Assess the Risks for the Consumer. Updated Version for ConsExpo 4
van Harmelen T., 2016, Environ. Int., 91, 150, 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.021
Hansen S.F., 2014, J. Nanopart. Res., 16, 1, 10.1007/s11051-013-2195-z
Jensen K.A., 2013, 6th International Symposium on Nanotechnology, Occupational and Environmental Health
Meesters J.A.J., 2014, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 5726, 10.1021/es500548h
Höck J., 2010, Guidelines on the Precautionary Matrix for Synthetic Nanomaterials
Vance M.E., 2015, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 6, 1769, 10.3762/bjnano.6.181
Eastlake A., 2016, J. Nanopart. Res., 18, 1, 10.1007/s11051-016-3476-0
2004, Targeted Risk Assessment Ecetoc, Technical Report no. 93
NANoREG Consortium, 2017, D1.11 on NANoREG Final Framework
OECD, 2016, Grouping and Read-Across for the Hazard Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials