A method to estimate mean lying rates and their full distribution

Abeler, J., Nosenzo, D., & Raymond, C. (2016). Preferences for truth-telling. IZA Discussion Papers 10188. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Banerjee, R., Gupta, N. D., & Villeval, M. C. (2017). The spillover effects of affirmative action on competitiveness and unethical behavior. European Economic Review, 101, 567–604.

Benndorf, V., Moellers, C., & Normann, H. T. (2017). Experienced vs. inexperienced participants in the lab: Do they behave differently? Journal of the Economic Science Association, 3(1), 12–25.

Cohn, A., Fehr, E., & Maréchal, M. A. (2014). Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature, 516(7529), 86–89.

Cohn, A., Maréchal, M. A., & Noll, T. (2015). Bad boys: how criminal Identity salience affects rule violation. Review of Economic Studies, 82(4), 1289–1308.

Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525–547.

Garbarino, E., Slonim, R., & Villeval, M. C. (2017). Loss aversion and lying behavior: theory, estimation and empirical evidence (July 2017). GATE Working Paper no 1631. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2876636.

Houser, D., Vetter, S., & Winter, J. (2012). Fairness and cheating. European Economic Review, 56, 1645–1655.

Jacobsen, C., & Piovesan, M. (2016). Tax me if you can: an artefactual field experiment on dishonesty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 124, 7–14.

Kröll, M., & Rustagi, D. (2016). Shades of dishonesty and cheating in informal milk markets in India. SAFE Working Paper, 134, Goethe University, Frankfurt.

Moshagen, M., & Hilbig, B. E. (2017). The statistical analysis of cheating paradigms. Behavioral Research, 49, 724–732.

Rigdon, M. L., & D’Esterre, A. P. (2015). The effect of competition on the nature of cheating behavior. Southern Economic Journal, 81(4), 1012–1024.

Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M. J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2011). Justified ethicality: observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 181–190.