A metacognitive tool: Theoretical and operational analysis of skills exercised in structured concept maps
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson, 2001
Atkinson, 1968, 2, 89
Ausubel, 1968
Davies, 2011, Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?, High. Educ., 62, 279, 10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
Duro, 2013, In search of critical thinking in psychology: an exploration of student and lecturer understandings in higher education, Psychol. Learn. Teach., 12, 275, 10.2304/plat.2013.12.3.275
Fischer, 2008, Dynamic cycles of cognitive and brain development: measuring growth in mind, brain, and education, 127
Harden, 2002, Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference?, Med. Teach., 24, 151, 10.1080/0142159022020687
Haskell, 2001
Stanley, D., Ivie. Ausubel׳s Learning Theory: An Approach To Teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills. (educational psychologist David Paul Ausubel). High School Journal 82.1 (Oct 1998): p. 35(1).
Karpicke, 2008, The critical importance of retrieval for learning, Science, 319, 966, 10.1126/science.1152408
Karpicke, 2011, Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping, Science, 331, 772, 10.1126/science.1199327
Karpicke, 2012, Retrieval-based learning: active retrieval promotes meaningful learning, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 21, 157, 10.1177/0963721412443552
Kharatmal, M, and Nagarjuna, G., 2010. Introducing rigor in concept maps. In: Croitoru, M., Ferré, S., and Lokose, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conceptual Structures: From Information to Intelligence, ICCS LNAI 6208, 199–202.
Kinchin, 2000, How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development, Educ. Res., 42, 43, 10.1080/001318800363908
Kinchin, I., 2008. The qualitative analysis of concept maps: some unforeseen consequences and emerging opportunities. In: A.J. Cañas, P. Reiska, M. Åhlberg & J.D. Novak, (Eds.) Concept Mapping: Connecting Educators. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Concept Mapping, Tallinn, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland.
Kinchin, 2010, Solving Cordelia׳s dilemma: threshold concepts within a punctuated model of learning, J. Biol. Educ., 44, 53, 10.1080/00219266.2010.9656194
Krathwohl, 2002, A revision of Bloom׳s taxonomy: an overview, Theory Pract., 41, 212, 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Mayer, 2001, Changing conceptions of learning: a century of progress in the scientific study of learning, 34
Mestre, 2002
Mintzes, 2005, Ausubel׳s cognitive assimilation theory: 1963, 39
Mintzes, 2005, Epilogue: meaningful learning, knowledge restructuring and conceptual change: on ways of teaching science for understanding, 327
Mintzes, 2011, Comment on “retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping”, Science, 334, 453c, 10.1126/science.1203698
Nesbit, 2006, Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis, Rev. Educ. Res., 76, 413, 10.3102/00346543076003413
Novack, 2008, 01
Novak, 2006
Novak, 2010, Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept map as facilitative tools in schools and corporations, J. e-Learn. Knowl. Soc., 6, 21
Racenet, N., Chevron, M.P., 2013. Utiliser les cartes conceptuelles pour développer et évaluer des aptitudes cognitives de haut niveau taxonomique en sciences. Communication in 25ème colloque de l׳ADMEE-Europe. Evaluation et autoévaluation, quels espaces de formation. Fribourg.
Roediger, 2006, The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 1, 181, 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
Terry, 2006, Learning and memory: basic principles
Tyler, 1950
Veenman, 2006, Metacognition an learning: conceptual and methodological considerations, Metacogn. Learn., 1, 3, 10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0