A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior?

Adams, D. & McCormick, A. (1982). Men unlearning violence: A group approach based onthe collective model. In M. Roy (Ed.), The abusive partner: An analysis of domesticbattering (pp. 170–197). New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.

Babcock, J. C. & Taillade, J. (2000). Evaluating interventions for men who batter. InJ. Vincent & E. Jouriles (Eds.), Domestic violence: Guidelines for research-informedpractice (pp. 37–77). Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E. & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analyticreview of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review 23(8), 1023–1053.

Berk, R., Boruch, T., Chambers, F., Rossi, P. & Witte, S. (1985). Social policyexperimentation: A position paper. Evaluation Review 9(4), 387–429.

Berk, R., Campbell, A., Klap, R. & Western, B. (1992). The deterrent effect of arrest inincidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. AmericanSociological Review 57(5), 698–708.

Brisson, N. (1981). Battering husbands: A survey of abusive men. Victimology 6, 338–344.

Chalk, R. & King, P. (1998). Violence in families: Assessing prevention and treatmentprograms. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

*Chen, H., Bersani, C., Myers, S. & Denton, R. (1989). Evaluating the effectiveness of acourt sponsored treatment program. Journal of Family Violence 4, 309–322.

Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issuesfor field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Cromwell, N. & Burgess, A. (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington,DC: National Academy Press.

Davis, R. & Taylor, B. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? Women andCriminal Justice 10, 69–93.

*Davis, R. C., Taylor, B. G. & Maxwell, C. D. (2000). Does batterer treatment reduceviolence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Washington, DC: National Institute ofJustice.

*Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of interventionsfor men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68,468–476.

*Dutton, D. (1984). Interventions into the problem of wife assault: Therapeutic, policy andresearch implications. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 16(4), 281–297.

Dutton, D. (1986). Wife assaulter’s explanations for assault: The neutralization of selfpunishment.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 18(4), 381–390.

Dutton, D. (1988). Research advances in the study of wife assault: Etiology and prevention.Law and Mental Health 4, 161–220.

Dutton, D. & McGregor, B. (1991). The symbiosis of arrest and treatment for wife assault:The case for combined intervention. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policyresponses (pp. 131–154). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.

Eisikovits, Z. & Edleson, J. (1989). Intervening with men who batter: A critical review ofthe literature. Social Service Review 63, 384–414.

Feder, L. (1997). Domestic violence and police response in a pro-arrest jurisdiction. Womenand Criminal Justice 8(4), 79–98.

*Feder, L. & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court mandated counseling fordomestic violence offenders: The Broward Experiment. Justice Quarterly 19(2), 343–375.

Feder, L. & Forde, D. (2000). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling fordomestic violence offenders: The Broward Experiment (Final report, Grant NIJ-96-WTNX-0008). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Farley, D. & Magill, J. (1988). An evaluation of a group program for men who batter. SocialWork With Groups 11(3), 53–65.

Feazell, C., Mayers, R. & Deschner, J. (1984). Services for men who batter: Implications forprograms and policies. Family Relations 33, 217–223.

Ford, D. & Regoli, M. J. (1993). The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters. In Z. Hilton(Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation (pp. 127–164).Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Gondolf, E. (1987). Evaluating programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects.Journal of Family Violence 2(1), 95–108.

Goolkasian, G. (1986). Confronting domestic violence: The role of criminal court judges.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

*Gordon, J. A. & Moriarty, L. J. (2003). The effects of domestic violence batterer treatmenton domestic violence batterer treatment and domestic violence recidivism. CriminalJustice and Behavior 30(1), 118–134.

Hamberger, L. K. & Hastings, J. (1989). Counseling male spouse abusers: Characteristics oftreatment completers and dropouts. Violence and Victims 4(1), 275–286.

Hamberger, L. K. & Hastings, J. (1993). Court-mandated treatment of men who assault theirpartner. In Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation(pp. 188–229). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

*Harrell, A. (1991). Evaluation of court-ordered treatment for domestic violence offenders(Final report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Hasselblad, V. & Hedges, L. V. (1995). Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests.Psychological Bulletin 117, 167–178.

Healey, K. & Smith, C. (1998). Batterer programs: What criminal justice agencies need toknow. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Healey, K., Smith, C. & O’Sullivan, C. (1998). Batterer intervention: Program approachesand criminal justice strategies. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.

Hilberman, E. (1980). Overview: The “wife-beater’s wife” reconsidered. American Journalof Psychiatry 137(11), 1336–1347.

Hirschel, J. D. & Hutchinson, I. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: TheCharlotte, North Carolina Experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 83(1),73–119.

Hotaling, G. & Sugarman, D. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wifeviolence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims 1(2), 101–124.

Jennings, J. (1987). History and issues in the treatment of battering men: A case forunstructured group therapy. Journal of Family Violence 2(3), 193–213.

Johnson, J. & Kanzler, D. (1993). Treating domestic violence: Evaluating the effectivenessof a domestic violence diversion program. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 15, 271–289.

*Jones, A. S. & Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Assessing the effect of batterer program completionon reassault: An instrumental variables analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18(1), 71–98.

Langan, P. & Innes, C. (1986). Preventing domestic violence against women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587, 16–30.

Miller, T., Cohen, M. & Wiersema, B. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: A new look.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

*Palmer, S., Brown, R. & Barrera, M. (1992). Group treatment program for abusivehusbands: Long-term evaluation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 62(2), 276–283.

Pence, E. (1983). The Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Project. Hamline Law Review 6,247–275.

Pirog-Good, M. & Stets-Kealey, J. (1985). Male batterers and battering prevention programs:A national survey. Response. 8, 8–12.

Rennison, C. R. & Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate partner violence. Washington, DC:National Institute of Justice.

Roberts, A. (1982). A national survey of services for batterers. In Maria Roy (Ed.), Theabusive partner: An analysis of domestic battering (pp. 230–243). New York: VanNostrand-Reinhold.

Rosenfeld, B. (1992). Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clinical Psychology Review12, 205–226.

Saunders, D. (1996). Interventions for men who batter: Do we know what works? InSession: Psychotherapy in Practice 2(3), 81–93.

Sherman, L. (1992). The influence of criminology on criminal law: Evaluating arrests formisdemeanor domestic violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 83, 1–45.

Snyder, D. & Scheer, N. (1981). Predicting disposition following brief residence at a shelterfor battered women. American Journal of Community Psychology 9, 559–566.

Sonkin, D. J. (1988). The male batterer: Clinical and research issues. Violence and Victims3(1), 65–79.

Straus, M. (1991). Conceptualization and measurement of battering: Implications for publicpolicy. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policy responses (pp. 19–47). Cincinnati,OH: Anderson.

Straus, M., Hamby, S., Boney-McCoy, S. & Sugarman, D. (1996). The revised ConflictTactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal ofFamily Issues 17(3), 283–316.

Sullivan, C., Rumptz, M., Campbell, R., Eby, K. & Davidson, W. (1996). Retainingparticipants in longitudinal community research: A comprehensive protocol. Journal ofApplied Behavioral Science 32(3), 262–276.

*Syers, M. & Edleson, J. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justiceintervention in woman abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 7, 490–502.

Taylor, B., Davis, R. & Maxwell, C. (2001). The effects of a group batterer treatmentprogram: A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Justice Quarterly 18(1), 171–201.

Tjaden, P. & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female andfemale-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence AgainstWomen Survey. Violence Against Women 6(2), 142–161.

Tolman, R. & Bennett, L. (1990). A review of quantitative research on men who batter.Journal of Interpersonal Violence 5, 87–118.

Tolman, R. & Edleson, J. (1995). Intervention for men who batter: A review of research.In S. Stith & M. Straus (Eds.), Understanding partner violence: Prevalence, causes,consequences and solutions (pp. 262–273). Minneapolis, MN: National Council onFamily Relations.

Weisburd, D., Lum, C. & Petrosino, A. (2001). Does research design affect study outcomesin criminal justice? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578, 50–70.

Widom, C. S. (1992). The cycle of violence. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.

Zorza, J. (2003). New research: Broward County Experiment shows no benefit from battererintervention programs. Domestic Violence Report 8, 23–25.