A meta-analysis of the gender gap(s) in venture funding: Funder- and entrepreneur-driven perspectives

†Adomdza, 2016, Decision biases and entrepreneurial finance, Small Bus. Econ., 47, 819, 10.1007/s11187-016-9739-4 ∗†Agier, 2013, Microfinance and gender: is there a glass ceiling on loan size?, World Dev., 42, 165, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.016 Aguinis, 2011, Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact, J. Manag., 37, 5 †Ahlers, 2015, Signaling in equity crowdfunding, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 39, 955, 10.1111/etap.12157 ∗†Alesina, 2013, Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 11, 45, 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01100.x ∗†Allison, 2017, Persuasion in crowdfunding: an elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance, J. Bus. Ventur., 32, 707, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002 †Allison, 2013, The effect of entrepreneurial rhetoric on microlending investment: an examination of the warm-glow effect, J. Bus. Ventur., 28, 690, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.003 ∗†Alonso-Almeida, 2013, Influence of gender and financing on tourist company growth, J. Bus. Res., 66, 621, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.025 ∗†Alsos, 2006, New venture financing and subsequent business growth in men–and women–led businesses, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 30, 667, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00141.x Anderson Anderson, 2019, Editorial: enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneur research, J. Bus. Ventur., 34, 105928, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.02.001 ∗†Anglin, 2018, Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: a social role theory perspective, J. Bus. Ventur., 33, 780, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.004 ∗†Anglin, 2018, The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance, J. Bus. Ventur., 33, 470, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.003 ∗†Arenius, 2006, Financing of small businesses: are mars and venus more alike than different?, Ventur. Cap., 8, 93, 10.1080/13691060500433793 Ashforth, 1989, Social identity theory and the organization, Acad. Manag. Rev., 14, 20, 10.5465/amr.1989.4278999 ∗Balachandra, 2019, Don’t pitch like a girl!: how gender stereotypes influence investor decisions, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 43, 116, 10.1177/1042258717728028 ∗Bapna ∗†Barbi, 2019, Human capital, investor trust, and equity crowdfunding, Res. Int. Bus. Finance, 49, 1, 10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.02.005 ∗†Barulina, 2014 ∗Beck, 2013, Gender and banking: are women better loan officers?, Rev. Finance, 17, 1279, 10.1093/rof/rfs028 ∗†Becker-Blease, 2007, Do women-owned businesses have equal access to angel capital?, J. Bus. Ventur., 22, 503, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.003 Becker-Blease, 2011, The effect of gender diversity on angel group investment, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 35, 709, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00391.x Bergh, 2016, Using meta analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship, Strat. Manag. J., 37, 477, 10.1002/smj.2338 †Berns, 2020, Dynamics of lending-based prosocial crowdfunding: using a social responsibility lens, J. Bus. Ethics, 161, 169, 10.1007/s10551-018-3932-0 Blair, 2001, Imagining stereotypes away: the moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 81, 828, 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.828 ∗†Blanchflower, 2003, Discrimination in the small business credit market, Rev. Econ. Stat., 85, 930, 10.1162/003465303772815835 Bosco, 2016, HARKing’s threat to organizational research: evidence from primary and meta-analytic sources, Person. Psychol., 69, 709, 10.1111/peps.12111 Bottia, 2015, Growing the roots of STEM majors: female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM, Econ. Educ. Rev., 45, 14, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.002 ∗†Brana, 2013, Microcredit: an answer to the gender problem in funding?, Small Bus. Econ., 40, 87, 10.1007/s11187-011-9346-3 ∗†Brinckmann, 2015, Why we plan: the impact of nascent entrepreneurs’ cognitive characteristics and human capital on business planning, Strat. Entrepreneurship J., 9, 153, 10.1002/sej.1197 ∗†Brooks, 2014, Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am., 111, 4427, 10.1073/pnas.1321202111 †Busenitz, 2005, Signaling in venture capitalist—new venture team funding decisions: does it indicate long–term venture outcomes?, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 29, 1, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00066.x †Butticè, 2018, Industry specificity and the effect of internal social capital in reward-based crowdfunding †Calic, 2016, Kicking off social entrepreneurship: how a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success, J. Manag. Stud., 53, 738 Card, 2015 Carter, 2003, The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs, J. Bus. Ventur., 18, 13, 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00078-2 ∗†Carter, 1998, The financing of male–and female–owned businesses, Enterpren. Reg. Dev., 10, 225, 10.1080/08985629800000013 †Carter, 1997, Discontinuance among new firms in retail: the influence of initial resources, strategy, and gender, J. Bus. Ventur., 12, 125, 10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00033-X †Cassar, 2006, Entrepreneur opportunity costs and intended venture growth, J. Bus. Ventur., 21, 610, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.011 †Chan, 2017, Crowdfunding innovative ideas: how incremental and radical innovativeness influence funding outcomes, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 41, 237, 10.1111/etap.12268 Cheung, 2014, Fixed-and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: examples and analyses in R, Behav. Res. Methods, 46, 29, 10.3758/s13428-013-0361-y Cheung, 2015, metaSEM: an R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling, Front. Psychol., 5, 1, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521 Cheung, 2015 Cheung, 2019, Some reflections on combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling, Res. Synth. Methods, 10, 15, 10.1002/jrsm.1321 Clain, 2000, Gender differences in full-time self-employment, J. Econ. Bus., 52, 499, 10.1016/S0148-6195(00)00032-1 †Cliff, 1998, Does one size fit all? Exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender, and business size, J. Bus. Benturing, 13, 523 †Cliff, 2005, Walking the talk? Gendered rhetoric vs. action in small firms, Organ. Stud., 26, 63, 10.1177/0170840605046490 ∗†Coleman, 2000, Access to capital and terms of credit: a comparison of men-and women owned small businesses, J. Small Bus. Manag., 38, 37 ∗†Coleman, 2007, The role of human and financial capital in the profitability and growth of women-owned small firms, J. Small Bus. Manag., 45, 303 †Courtney, 2017, Resolving information asymmetry: signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 41, 265, 10.1111/etap.12267 Cudeck, 1989, Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models, Psychol. Bull., 105, 317, 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.317 †Cumming, 2019, Crowdfunding models: keep-it-all vs. all-or-nothing, Financ. Manag., 1 ∗Davis, 2017, Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: the influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion, J. Bus. Ventur., 32, 90, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.006 ∗†Dorfleitner, 2019, From credit risk to social impact: on the funding determinants in interest-free peer-to-peer lending, J. Bus. Ethics, 1 Duval, 2000, A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 95, 89 Duval, 2000, Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis, Biometrics, 56, 455, 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x Eagly, 2011, Social role theory, Handb. Theories Soc. Psychol., 2, 458 Eesley, 2017, Social influence in career choice: evidence from a randomized field experiment on entrepreneurial mentorship, Res. Pol., 46, 636, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.010 ∗†Eddleston, 2016, Do you see what I see? Signaling effects of gender and firm characteristics on financing entrepreneurial ventures, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 40, 489, 10.1111/etap.12117 Egger, 1997, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test, Br. Med. J., 315, 629, 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 Eisenberger, 2019, Is the employee organization relationship dying or thriving? A temporal meta-analysis, J. Appl. Psychol., 104, 1036, 10.1037/apl0000390 †Eriksson, 2009, Gender and sources of finance in Finnish SMEs: a contextual view, Int. J. Gender Entrepreneurship, 1, 176, 10.1108/17566260910990883 ∗†Ewens, 2020, Are early stage investors biased against women?, J. Financ. Econ., 135, 653, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.07.002 ∗†Fabowale, 1995, Gender, structural factors, and credit terms between Canadian small businesses and financial institutions, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 19, 41, 10.1177/104225879501900404 Fairlie, 2009, Gender differences in business performance: evidence from the characteristics of business owners survey, Small Bus. Econ., 33, 375, 10.1007/s11187-009-9207-5 ∗Foo, 2005, Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges’ evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition, J. Bus. Ventur., 20, 385, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.04.001 ∗†Francis, 2013, The impact of CFO gender on bank loan contracting, J. Account. Audit Finance, 28, 53, 10.1177/0148558X12452399 ∗†Gallant, 2015 ∗†Garwe, 2012, The impact of gender on SME characteristics and access to debt finance in South Africa, Dev. South Afr., 29, 448, 10.1080/0376835X.2012.706040 Geiger, 2019, 44, 1136 ∗†Geiger, 2018, Female entrepreneurs and equity crowdfunding in the US: receiving less when asking for more, J. Bus. Vent. Insights, 10 ∗†Gerasymenko, 2015, Changing the business model: effects of venture capital firms and outside CEOs on portfolio company performance, Strat. Entrepreneurship J., 9, 79, 10.1002/sej.1189 Gomes, 2010, Levered returns, J. Finance, 65, 467, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01541.x †Gorbatai, 2015 ∗†Greenberg, 2017, Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders, Adm. Sci. Q., 62, 341, 10.1177/0001839216678847 †Greene, 2001, Patterns of venture capital funding: is gender a factor?, Ventur. Cap., 3, 63, 10.1080/13691060118175 ∗†Griffin, 2012 Gundry, 2001, The ambitious entrepreneur: high growth strategies of women-owned enterprises, J. Bus. Ventur., 16, 453, 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00059-2 †Haase, 2005 †Haines, 1999, Myths and realities: an empirical study of banks and the gender of small business clients, Can. J. Administr. Sci., 16, 291, 10.1111/j.1936-4490.1999.tb00690.x ∗†Hellmann, 2019 Herrmann, 2016, The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in STEM courses, Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol., 38, 258, 10.1080/01973533.2016.1209757 Hmieleski, 2019, The Yin and Yang of entrepreneurship: gender differences in the importance of communal and agentic characteristics for entrepreneurs’ subjective well-being and performance, J. Bus. Ventur., 34, 709, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.006 ∗†Horvát, 2017, Gender differences in equity crowdfunding †Humblet, 2019 Hunter, 2004 ∗†Hussain, 2010, “Enter the dragoness”: firm growth, finance, guanxi, and gender in China, Gender Manag.: Int. J., 25, 137, 10.1108/17542411011026302 †Islam, 2018, Signaling by early stage startups: US government research grants and venture capital funding, J. Bus. Ventur., 33, 35, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.10.001 †Iurchenko, 2019 ∗Jancenelle, 2018, The role of economic and normative signals in international prosocial crowdfunding: an illustration using market orientation and psychological capital, Int. Bus. Rev., 27, 208, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.07.002 ∗†Jayawarna, 2012, Gender and alternative start-up business funding, Compet. Change, 16, 303, 10.1179/1024529412Z.00000000019 Jiang, 2012, When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation, J. Appl. Psychol., 97, 1077, 10.1037/a0028610 †Johan ∗†Johnson, 2018, A woman’s place is in the… startup! Crowdfunder judgments, implicit bias, and the stereotype content model, J. Bus. Ventur., 33, 813, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.003 †Josefy, 2017, The role of community in crowdfunding success: evidence on cultural attributes in funding campaigns to “Save the local theater”, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 41, 161, 10.1111/etap.12263 ∗†Kanze, 2018, We ask men to win and women not to lose: closing the gender gap in startup funding, Acad. Manag. J., 61, 586, 10.5465/amj.2016.1215 Kepes, 2012, Publication bias in the organizational sciences, Organ. Res. Methods, 15, 624, 10.1177/1094428112452760 †Kessy, 2009, 125 ∗†Kim, 2006, Do equally owned small businesses have equal access to credit?, Small Bus. Econ., 27, 369 †Kleinert, 2018, Third-party signals in equity crowdfunding: the role of prior financing, Small Bus. Econ., 1–25 †Ko, 2018, Signaling for more money: the roles of founders’ human capital and investor prominence in resource acquisition across different stages of firm development, J. Bus. Ventur., 33, 438, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.001 †Koch, 2015, Crowdfunding success factors: the characteristics of successfully funded projects on crowdfunding platforms Kossinets, 2009, Origins of homophily in an evolving social network, Am. J. Sociol., 115, 405, 10.1086/599247 ∗†Lange, 2007, Pre-start-up formal business plans and post-start-up performance: a study of 116 new ventures, Ventur. Cap., 9, 237, 10.1080/13691060701414840 Lawrence, 2020, Homophily: measure and meaning, Acad. Manag. Ann., 10.5465/annals.2018.0147 †Lee, 2014, Revisiting the entrepreneur gender–performance relationship: a firm perspective, Small Bus. Econ., 42, 769, 10.1007/s11187-013-9497-5 †Li, 2008, Duration analysis of venture capital staging: a real options perspective, J. Bus. Ventur., 23, 497, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.10.004 †Li, 2017, Catching fire and spreading it: a glimpse into displayed entrepreneurial passion in crowdfunding campaigns, J. Appl. Psychol., 102, 1075, 10.1037/apl0000217 Lindquist, 2015, Why do entrepreneurial parents have entrepreneurial children?, J. Labor Econ., 33, 269, 10.1086/678493 †Lukkarinen, 2016, Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns, Decis. Support Syst., 87, 26, 10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.006 ∗†Mahmood, 2019, What’s in a logo? The impact of complex visual cues in equity crowdfunding, J. Bus. Ventur., 34, 41, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.006 ∗†Malmström, 2017, Gender stereotypes and venture support decisions: how governmental venture capitalists socially construct entrepreneurs’ potential, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 41, 833, 10.1111/etap.12275 †Malmström, 2018, When stereotypical gender notions see the light of day, will they burst? Venture capitalists’ gender constructions versus venturing performance facts, J. Bus. Vent. Insights, 9, 32, 10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.01.002 †Malmström, 2020, What do they think and what do they say? Gender bias, entrepreneurial attitude in writing and venture capitalists’ funding decisions, J. Bus. Vent. Insights, 13 †Malmström, 2018, Bank lending and financial discrimination from the formal economy: how women entrepreneurs get forced into involuntary bootstrapping, J. Bus. Vent. Insights, 10 ∗Matusik, 2008, Values and judgment under uncertainty: evidence from venture capitalist assessments of founders, Strat. Entrepreneurship J., 2, 95, 10.1002/sej.45 Miao, 2017, An exploratory meta-analysis of the nomological network of bootstrapping in SMEs, J. Bus. Vent. Insights, 8, 1, 10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.04.002 Michaelis, 2019, Gender bias and venture funding: discussing bias in the entrepreneurship classroom, Entrepreneurship Educ. Pedagogy ∗Mijid, 2009 †Milanov, 2015, Making the most of group relationships: the role of gender and boundary effects in microcredit groups, J. Bus. Ventur., 30, 822, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.04.001 ∗†Mohammadi, 2018, Gender differences in the contribution patterns of equity crowdfunding investors, Small Bus. Econ., 50, 275, 10.1007/s11187-016-9825-7 †Mollick, 2014, The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study, J. Bus. Ventur., 29, 1, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005 Morris, 2006, The dilemma of growth: understanding venture size choices of women entrepreneurs, J. Small Bus. Manag., 44, 221 ∗†Moss, 2015, The effect of virtuous and entrepreneurial orientations on microfinance lending and repayment: a signaling theory perspective, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 39, 27, 10.1111/etap.12110 ∗†Moss, 2018, Funding the story of hybrid ventures: crowdfunder lending preferences and linguistic hybridity, J. Bus. Ventur., 33, 643, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.004 ∗†Muravyev, 2009, Entrepreneurs’ gender and financial constraints: evidence from international data, J. Comp. Econ., 37, 270, 10.1016/j.jce.2008.12.001 Nanda, 2010, Workplace peers and entrepreneurship, Manag. Sci., 56, 1116, 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1179 ∗Nanyondo, 2017 ∗†Nguyen, 2019 ∗†Nitani, 2017, On Crowdfunding success: firm and owner attributes and social networking ∗†Oo, 2019, User entrepreneurs’ multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity, J. Bus. Ventur., 34, 105895, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.005 ∗†Oranburg, 2019, Do female investors support female entrepreneurs? An empirical analysis of angel investor behavior ∗†Orser, 2006, Women entrepreneurs and financial capital, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 30, 643, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00140.x ∗†Parhankangas, 2017, Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs, J. Bus. Ventur., 32, 215, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.11.001 ∗†Parhankangas, 2019, He says, she says: the impact of gender specific linguistic style on crowdfunding outcomes, Acad. Manag. Proc., 10.5465/AMBPP.2019.12932abstract Park, 2013, Turnover rates and organizational performance: a meta-analysis, J. Appl. Psychol., 98, 268, 10.1037/a0030723 Pfeffer, 1978 †Piva, 2018, Human capital signals and entrepreneurs’ success in equity crowdfunding, Small Bus. Econ., 51, 667, 10.1007/s11187-017-9950-y ∗Poczter, 2018, Gender disparity in angel financing, Small Bus. Econ., 51, 31, 10.1007/s11187-017-9922-2 Pollack, 2020, Passion at work: a meta Analysis of individual work outcomes, J. Organ. Behav., 10.1002/job.2434 Preacher, 2012, Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects, Commun. Methods Meas., 6, 77, 10.1080/19312458.2012.679848 Purvanova, 2010, Gender differences in burnout: a meta-analysis, J. Vocat. Behav., 77, 168, 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.006 Qian, 2003, Profitability of small-and medium-sized enterprises in high-tech industries: the case of the biotechnology industry, Strat. Manag. J., 24, 881, 10.1002/smj.344 †Ralcheva, 2016, The role of certification for equity crowdfunding success †Ralcheva, 2019, Forecasting success in equity crowdfunding, Small Bus. Econ., 1–18 †Renko, 2013, Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 37, 1045, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00522.x Rocha, 2020, Mind the gap: the role of gender in entrepreneurial career choice and social influence by founders, Strat. Manag. J., 10.1002/smj.3135 Rosenthal, 1991 Rosenthal, 1994, Parametric measures of effect size, 231 ∗†Sales, 2017 †Sanders, 2004, Sorting things out: valuation of new firms in uncertain markets, Strat. Manag. J., 25, 167, 10.1002/smj.370 †Saparito, 2013, Bank–firm relationships: do perceptions vary by gender?, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 37, 837, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00524.x Scott, 2018, Efficacy of exercise therapy on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Clin. Oncol., 36, 2297, 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.5809 †Shafi, 2019, Investors’ evaluation criteria in equity crowdfunding, Small Bus. Econ., 1–35 †Shane, 2002, Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures, Manag. Sci., 48, 364, 10.1287/mnsc.48.3.364.7731 ∗†Shlyakhtovska, 2018 †Signori †Skirnevskiy, 2017, The influence of internal social capital on serial creators’ success in crowdfunding, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 41, 209, 10.1111/etap.12272 ∗†Slimane, 2019, Crowdlending campaigns for renewable energy: success factors, J. Clean. Prod. ∗†Snellman ∗†Srinivas, 2019 †Stanko, 2017, Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation, Res. Pol., 46, 784, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.003 ∗†Storey, 2004, Racial and gender discrimination in the micro firms credit market?: evidence from Trinidad and Tobago, Small Bus. Econ., 23, 401, 10.1007/s11187-004-7259-0 Thébaud, 2015, Business as plan B: institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries, Adm. Sci. Q., 60, 671, 10.1177/0001839215591627 ∗†Venturelli, 2019, From seeker side to investor side: gender dynamics in UK equity crowdfunding investments, 97 ∗†Verheul, 2001, Start-up capital: "Does gender matter?, Small Bus. Econ., 16, 329, 10.1023/A:1011178629240 Viechtbauer, 2010, Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package, J. Stat. Software, 36, 1 †Vismara, 2016, Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding, Small Bus. Econ., 46, 579, 10.1007/s11187-016-9710-4 †Vismara, 2018, Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 42, 467, 10.1111/etap.12261 Viswesvaran, 1995, Theory testing: combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling, Person. Psychol., 48, 865, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x Vora, 2016, Influence of cranial radiotherapy on outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with contemporary therapy, J. Clin. Oncol., 34, 919, 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2850 †Wagner, 2007, What a difference a Y makes - female and male nascent entrepreneurs in Germany, Small Bus. Econ., 28, 1, 10.1007/s11187-005-0259-x Wallace, 2014, Gender and supportive co-worker relations in the medical profession, Gend. Work. Organ., 21, 1, 10.1111/gwao.12007 †Wang, 2018, Understanding the importance of interaction between creators and backers in crowdfunding success, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 27, 106, 10.1016/j.elerap.2017.12.004 ∗†Watson, 2009, Gender and the SME “finance gap”, Int. J. Gender Entrepreneurship, 1, 42, 10.1108/17566260910942336 †Watson, 2003, Adjusting for risk in comparing the performances of male-and female-controlled SMEs, J. Bus. Ventur., 18, 773, 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00128-3 ∗Watson, 2017, Gender differences in new venture funding: supply side discrimination or demand-side disinclination?, 153 Wood, 2008, Methodology for dealing with duplicate study effects in a meta-analysis, Organ. Res. Methods, 11, 79, 10.1177/1094428106296638 †Wu, 2012, Second–order gender effects: the case of US small business borrowing cost, Enterpren. Theor. Pract., 36, 443, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00503.x ∗†Yacus, 2019, The influence of funding approaches, growth expectations, and industry gender distribution on high-growth women entrepreneurs, J. Small Bus. Manag., 57, 59 Yu, 2011, Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures, Strat. Manag. J., 32, 424, 10.1002/smj.884 Zhao, 2007, The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis, Person. Psychol., 60, 647, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x