A living-sphere approach for locally oriented sustainable design
Tóm tắt
Achieving a sustainable consumption and production pattern is one of the United Nation’s sustainable development goals for 2030. To achieve this, it is necessary to consider the environmental burden from a product life cycle and the quality of life of the consumer. In this study, a systematic approach for connecting basic human needs and the product development process, called the living-sphere approach, is proposed. This approach is intended to encompass the complete relationship between region-specific basic needs and durable products. In this approach, value graphs, which visualize the value system of products, are connected to satisfiers fulfilling the basic needs set out by Max-Neef. A value graph links satisfiers and the traditional product development process. The significance of the proposed approach is twofold. First, improving quality of daily life and traditional product development are combined in the same framework. Second, the design of single products and the total optimization of multi-products are supported at the requirement level.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arnould E, Wallendorf M (1994) Market-oriented Etnography: interpretation building and Marleting strategy formulation. J Mar Res XXXI:484–504
Aoe T, Yamamoto R, Ikaga T, Kondo Y, Matsuoka Y, Fukuda M (2010) Factor X (eco-efficiency) assessment on global warming a household in Japan. J Japan Inst Energy 89:1070–1087 in Japanese
Closing D (1993) Total quality development. ASME, New York
Daly H, Cobb J, Cobb C (1994) For the common good: redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Beacon Press, Boston
Dean H (2010) Understanding Human Need. The Policy Press, Bristol
Deutscher G (2010) Through the language glass: why the world looks different in other languages. Metropolitan Books and Henry Holt and Company, New York
Geels F, McMeekin A, Mylan J, Southerton D (2015) A critical appraisal of sustainable consumption and production research: the reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions. Glob Environ Chang 34:1–12
Gelbmann U, Hammerl B (2015) Integrative re-use systems as innovative business models for devising sustainable product-service-systems. J Clean Prod 97:50–60
Guillen-Royo M, Guardiola J, Garcia-Quero F (2017) Sustainable development in times of economic crisis: a needs-based illustration from Granada (Spain). J Clean Prod 150:267–276
Hofstede G (1994) Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pac J Manag:81–99
Hofstede G, McCrae R (2004) Personality and culture revisited: linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cult Res 38(1):52–88
Holtzclaw EV (2013) Laddering. Wiley, Hoboken
Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P, Kennedy C (2014) Peak waste – when is it likely to occur? J Ind Ecol 19(1):117–128
Ishii K (1998) Textbook of ME217 Design for Manufacture: product definition. Stanford University
ISO (2002) ISO/TR 14062 environmental management - integrating environmental aspects into product design and development, Geneva
Jackson T (2005) Motivating Sustainable Consumption. Sustainable Development Research Network, pp 10. Available via DIALOG. http://www.sustainablelifestyles.ac.uk/sites/default/files/motivating_sc_final.pdf
Kano N, Seraku N, Takahashi F, Tsuji S (1984) Attractive quality and must-be quality. J Japanese Soc Quality Control 14(2):39–48 in Japanese
Kimita K, Shimomura Y, Arai T (2009) Evaluation of customer satisfaction for PSS design. J Manuf Technol Manag 20(5):654–673
Kobayashi Y, Kobayashi H, Hongu A, Sanehira K (2005) A practical method for quantifying eco-efficiency using eco-design support tools. J Ind Ecol 9(4):131–144
Kobayashi H (2016) Perspectives on sustainable product design methodology focused on local communities. In: Matsumoto M, Masui K, Fukushige S, Kondoh S (eds) Sustainability through innovation in product life cycle design. Springer, eBook, pp 79–92
Koren Y (2010) The global manufacturing revolution. John Wiley, Hoboken
Max-Neef M (1991) Human scale Developmenmt. The Apex Press, New York
Nabavi E, Daniell K, Najafi H (2017) Boundary matters: the potential of system dynamics to support sustainability? J Clean Prod 140:312–323
OECD (2008) Environmental Outlook to 2030
OECD (2013) OECD Guidelines on Measuring Sujective Well-beeing
Ohmae K (1991) The mind of strategist: the art of Japanese business. McGraw-Hill, New York
Osterwolder A, Pigneur Y, Smith A, Bernarda G, Papadakos T (2014) Value Proposition Design. Wiley, Hoboken
Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 30–52
Spencer J, Lilley D, Porter S (2015) The opportunities that different cultural contexts create for sustainable design: a laundry care example. J Clean Prod 107:279–290
Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi J (2010) Mismeasuring our lives: why GDP Doesn’t add up. The New Press, New York
Sugita Y, Fukushige S, Kobayashi H (2017) A visualization system of design information for locally-oriented sustainable product. Procedia CIRP 61:617–622
Tukker A (2015) Product Services for a Resource-efficient and Circular Economy – a review. J Clean Prod 97:76–91
UK Department for Business Innovation & Skills (2013) Low carbon environmental goods and services (LCGES), Report for 2011/2012
Umwelt Bundesamt (2018) Indicator: Environmentally friendly consumption, https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/indicator-environmentally-friendly-consumption. Accessed 25 May 2018
UN (2015) Sustainable Development Goals, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 25 May 2018
UNDP (2015) Human Development Report
UNEP (1997) Ecodesign – a Promissing Apporach to sustainable production and consumption –, Hertfordshire
UNEP (2010) ABC of SCP – Clarifying Concepts on Sustainable Consumption and Production
UNEP (2012) Global outlook on sustainable consumption and production policies, Nairobi
The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future