A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Silvis, 1976, Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey, JAMA, 235, 928, 10.1001/jama.1976.03260350032023
Arrowsmith, 1991, Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 37, 421, 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70773-6
Luning, 2007, Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients, Surg Endosc, 21, 994, 10.1007/s00464-007-9251-7
Newcomer, 1994, Complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and their management, Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am, 4, 551, 10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30496-3
Rabeneck, 2008, Bleeding and perforation after out-patient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice, Gastroenterology, 135, 1899, 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.058
Eisen, 2002, Complications in upper GI endoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 55, 784, 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70404-5
Freeman, 1996, Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, N Engl J Med, 335, 909, 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301
Quine, 1995, A prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing and sedation methods, Gut, 36, 462, 10.1136/gut.36.3.462
Cotton, 2009, Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years, Gastrointest Endosc, 7, 80, 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.039
Taylor, 1992, Complications of upper endoscopy and colonoscopy, 551
Cotton, 2008, Risks, prevention and management, 151
Mergener, 2007, Defining and measuring endoscopic complications: more questions than answers, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 17, 1, 10.1016/j.giec.2007.01.001
2000, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 52, 831, 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70219-7
Faigel, 2006, Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction, Gastrointest Endosc, 63, S3, 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.017
2000, Quality and outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 52, 827, 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70218-5
Cotton, 1994, Outcomes of endoscopy procedures: struggling towards definitions, Gastrointest Endosc, 40, 514, 10.1016/S0016-5107(94)70228-4
Fleischer, 1994, Better definition of endoscopic complications and other negative outcomes, Gastrointest Endosc, 40, 511, 10.1016/S0016-5107(94)70227-6
Cotton, 1991, Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus, Gastrointest Endosc, 37, 383, 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2
Fleischer, 1997, A new system for defining endoscopic complications emphasizing the measure of importance, Gastrointest Endosc, 45, 128, 10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70234-7
American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Available at: www.acsnsqip.org. Accessed December 9, 2009.
Society for Interventional Radiology. HI-IQ. Health and Inventory Information for Quality. Available at: www.hi-iq.com. Accessed December 9, 2009.
Department of Health and Human Resources. Office for Human Research Protection. Guidance on reviewing and reporting unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others and adverse events. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/AdvEvntGuid.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2009.
National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Available at: http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_v40. Accessed December 9, 2009.
National Library of Medicine. Unified Medical Language System. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/Snomed/snomed_main.html. Accessed December 9, 2009.
World Organization of Digestive Endoscopy. Available at: http://www.omed.org/index.php/resources/re_mst/. Accessed December 9, 2009.
Cotton, 2002, Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods, Gastrointest Endosc, 56, S283, 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70026-6
Zubarik, 1999, Prospective assessment of 30-day follow-up after outpatient endoscopy, Am J Gastroenterol, 94, 1539
Bini, 2003, Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcomes study, Gastrointest Endosc, 57, 8, 10.1067/mge.2003.15
Zubarik, 1999, Prospective assessment of 30-day follow-up after outpatient colonoscopy, Gastrointest Endosoc, 50, 322, 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.97111
Garrow, 2009, Comparing ERCP practice and outcomes by level of experience, Gastrointest Endosc, 69, 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.565
Urbach, 2003, Population-based study of the risk of acute pancreatitis following ERCP, Gastrointest Endosc, 57
Petersen, 2002, ERCP outcomes: defining the operators, experience and environments, Gastrointest Endosc, 55, 953, 10.1067/mge.2002.123622
Cotton, 2002, How many times have you done this procedure, doctor?, Am J Gastroenterol, 97, 322, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05526.x
Schutz, 2000, Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcomes data, Gastrointest Endosc, 51, 535, 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70285-9
Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, Eisen G, et al. Identifying and reporting risk factors for AEs in endoscopy (In press).
Charlson, 1987, A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation, J Chron Dis, 40, 373, 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
Knaus, 1991, The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults, Chest, 100, 1619, 10.1378/chest.100.6.1619
Prytherch, 1998, POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality, Br J Surg, 85, 1217, 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x
Keat, 1978, The ASA classification of physical status: a recapitulation, Anesthesiology, 49, 233, 10.1097/00000542-197810000-00001
Mallampati, 1985, A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study, Can Anaesth Soc, 32, 429, 10.1007/BF03011357