A large-scale group consensus reaching approach considering self-confidence with two-tuple linguistic trust/distrust relationship and its application in life cycle sustainability assessment
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aghdam, 2020, An uncertainty-aware computational trust model considering the co-existence of trust and distrust in social networks, Inf. Sci. (Ny), 513, 465, 10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.067
Andersson, 1998, The feasibility of including sustainability in LCA for product development, J. Clean. Prod., 6, 289, 10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00028-6
Chen, 2021, Online-review analysis based large-scale group decision-making for determining passenger demands and evaluating passenger satisfaction: case study of high-speed rail system in China, Inf. Fusion, 69, 22, 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.11.010
Chen, 2022, Expertise-structure and risk-appetite-integrated two-tiered collective opinion generation framework for large scale group decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3179594
Cheng, 2020, Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making, Inf. Fusion, 59, 30, 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.004
Chiclana, 1998, Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision making model based on fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 97, 33, 10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00339-9
del Moral, 2018, A comparative study on consensus measures in group decision making, Int. J. Intellig. Syst., 33, 1624, 10.1002/int.21954
Dong, 2014, Multiperson decision making with different preference representation structures: a direct consensus framework and its properties, Knowl. Based Syst., 58, 45, 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.09.021
Dong, 2021, Consensus reaching and strategic manipulation in group decision making with trust relationships, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern.-Syst., 51, 6304, 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2961752
Dong, 2018, Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: research paradigms and challenges, Knowl. Based Syst., 162, 3, 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.036
Du, 2021, Consensus convergence in large-group social network environment: coordination between trust relationship and opinion similarity, Knowl. Based Syst., 217, 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106828
Florindo, 2020, Multicriteria decision-making and probabilistic weighing applied to sustainable assessment of beef life cycle, J. Clean. Prod., 242, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118362
Fu, 2016, Distributed preference relations for multiple attribute decision analysis, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 67, 457, 10.1057/jors.2015.71
Gai, 2020, A joint feedback strategy for consensus in large-scale group decision making under social network, Comput. Ind. Eng., 147, 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106626
Gai, 2022, Consensus- trust driven bidirectional feedback mechanism in social network group decision making, Group Decis. Negot.
Gao, 2021, Satisfaction-driven consensus model for social network MCGDM with incomplete information under probabilistic linguistic trust, Comput. Ind. Eng., 154, 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107099
Gao, 2022, Learning personalized individual semantics through the data of distributed linguistic preference relations: a two-stage method to support linguistic consensus reaching, Comput. Ind. Eng., 172, 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108581
Ghavipour, 2018, Trust propagation algorithm based on learning automata for inferring local trust in online social networks, Knowl. Based Syst., 143, 307, 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.06.034
Gong, 2018, The optimization ordering model for intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with utility functions, Knowl. Based Syst., 162, 174, 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.012
Herrera-Viedma, 2004, Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 154, 98, 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7
Herrera-Viedma, 2021, Revisiting fuzzy and linguistic decision making: scenarios and challenges for making wiser decisions in a better way, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybern.: Syst., 51, 191, 10.1109/TSMC.2020.3043016
Ji, 2023, An online reviews-driven large-scale group decision making approach for evaluating user satisfaction of sharing accommodation, Expert Syst. Appl., 213, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118875
Jolliet, 2004, The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 9, 394, 10.1007/BF02979083
Klopffer, 2008, State-of-the-art in life cycle sustainability assessment (LSCA) of products, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13, 89, 10.1065/lca2008.02.376
Li, 2021, Technology selection for hydrogen production in China by integrating emergy into life cycle sustainability assessment, J. Clean Prod., 294, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126303
Li, 2021, Two-stage stochastic minimum cost consensus models with asymmetric adjustment costs, Inf. Fusion, 71, 77, 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.02.004
Li, 2021, Multi-attribute group decision making with opinion dynamics based on social trust network, Inf. Fusion, 75, 102, 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.04.010
Liang, 2017, A social ties-based approach for group decision-making problems with incomplete additive preference relations, Knowl. Based Syst., 119, 68, 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.12.001
Liao, 2021, How to process local and global consensus? A large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis with probabilistic linguistic information, Inf. Sci. (Ny), 579, 368, 10.1016/j.ins.2021.08.014
Liu, 2019, Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 275, 737, 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.075
Liu, 2017, Evaluation, ranking and selection of R&D projects by multiple experts: an evidential reasoning rule based approach, Scientometrics, 111, 1501, 10.1007/s11192-017-2278-1
Liu, 2017, Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence, Fuzzy Optimiz. Decis. Making, 16, 429, 10.1007/s10700-016-9254-8
Liu, 2019, Social network group decision making: managing self-confidence-based consensus model with the dynamic importance degree of experts and trust-based feedback mechanism, Inf. Sci. (Ny), 505, 215, 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.050
Liu, 2021, A knowledge coverage-based trust propagation for recommendation mechanism in social network group decision making, Appl. Soft Comput., 101, 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107005
Liu, 2017, A trust induced recommendation mechanism for reaching consensus in group decision making, Knowl. Based Syst., 119, 221, 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.12.014
Lu, 2022, Consensus progress for large-scale group decision making in social networks with incomplete probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information, Appl. Soft Comput., 126, 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109249
Lu, 2021, Consensus of large-scale group decision making in social network: the minimum cost model based on robust optimization, Inf. Sci. (Ny), 547, 910, 10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.022
Meng, 2018, A programming-based algorithm for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making, Knowl. Based Syst., 144, 122, 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.033
Ren, 2021, Group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations based on modified extent measurement, Expert Syst. Appl., 171, 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114235
Rodríguez, 2021, Comprehensive minimum cost models for large scale group decision making with consistent fuzzy preference relations, Knowl. Based Syst., 215, 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106780
Saaty, 1994
Shafer, 1976
Smarandache, 2010, Fusion of sources of evidence with different importances and reliabilities, 1
Sun, 2022, A dynamic feedback mechanism with attitudinal consensus threshold for minimum adjustment cost in group decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 30, 1287, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3057705
Tang, 2021, From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: what are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey, Omega (Westport), 100
Tanino, 1984, Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 12, 117, 10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0
Tran, 2002, Multiobjective fuzzy regression with central tendency and possibilistic properties, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 130, 21, 10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00138-5
Valente, 2019, Life cycle sustainability assessment of hydrogen from biomass gasification: a comparison with conventional hydrogen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 21193, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.105
Victor, 2009, Gradual trust and distrust in recommender systems, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 160, 1367, 10.1016/j.fss.2008.11.014
Wang, 2006, Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 174, 1885, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.059
Wang, 2021, A two-stage minimum adjustment consensus model for large scale decision making based on reliability modeled by two-dimension 2-tuple linguistic information, Comput. Ind. Eng., 151, 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106973
Wasserman, 1994, Social network analysis in the social and behavioral sciences, 3
Wu, 2017, A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation, Knowl. Based Syst., 122, 39, 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.031
Wu, 2022, Two-fold personalized feedback mechanism for social network consensus by uninorm interval trust propagation, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 52, 11081, 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3076420
Wu, 2016, Uninorm trust propagation and aggregation methods for group decision making in social network with four tuple information, Knowl. Based Syst., 96, 29, 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.004
Wu, 2021, A maximum self-esteem degree based feedback mechanism for group consensus reaching with the distributed linguistic trust propagation in social network, Inf. Fusion, 67, 80, 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.010
Wu, 2021, Distributed linguistic representations in decision making: taxonomy, key elements and applications, and challenges in data science and explainable artificial intelligence, Inf. Fusion, 65, 165, 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.018
Wu, 2016, Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations, Omega (Westport), 65, 28
Yang, 2013, Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination, Artif. Intell., 205, 1, 10.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003
Yang, 2022, Large-scale group decision-making for prioritizing engineering characteristics in quality function deployment under comparative linguistic environment, Appl. Soft Comput., 127, 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109359
Yuan, 2021, A minimum adjustment consensus framework with compromise limits for social network group decision making under incomplete information, Inf. Sci. (Ny), 549, 249, 10.1016/j.ins.2020.11.014
Zha, 2022, Consensus reaching in multiple attribute group decision making: a multi-stage optimization feedback mechanism with individual bounded confidences, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 30, 3333, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3113571
Zhang, 2014, Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments, Inf. Fusion, 17, 46, 10.1016/j.inffus.2012.01.006
Zhang, 2021, Modeling personalized individual semantics and consensus in comparative linguistic expression preference relations with self-confidence: an optimization-based approach, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 29, 627, 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2957259
Zhang, 2016, Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation, Appl. Soft Comput., 49, 817, 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.045
Zhang, 2020, Consensus reaching for social network group decision making by considering leadership and bounded confidence, Knowl. Based Syst., 204, 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106240
Zhang, 2017, Managing multigranular linguistic distribution assessments in large-scale multiattribute group decision making, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern.: Syst., 47, 3063, 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2560521
Zhang, 2021, Consensus reaching for group decision making with multi-granular unbalanced linguistic information: a bounded confidence and minimum adjustment-based approach, Inf. Fusion, 74, 96, 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.04.006
Zheng, 2020, Incorporating uncertainty into life-cycle sustainability assessment of pavement alternatives, J. Clean Prod., 264, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121466
Zhou, 2020, Assignment of attribute weights with belief distributions for MADM under uncertainties, Knowl. Based Syst., 189, 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105110
Zhou, 2018, Evidential reasoning rule for MADM with both weights and reliabilities in group decision making, Knowl. Based Syst., 143, 142, 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.013