A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for analysing operational hazards in Heavy Fuel Oil-based power plants
Tài liệu tham khảo
A.C. Ahmad, I.N.M. Zin, M.K. Othman, N.H. Muhamad, Hazard identification, risk assessment and risk control (HIRARC) accidents at power plant, in: MATEC Web of Conferences Vol. 66, 2016, p. 00105.
Rathod, 2017, Hazard analysis and risk assessment in thermal power plant, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol., 6, 177
Guida, 2021, Fundamental aspects and applications of ultrasonically induced cavitation in heavy fuel oil with a focus on de-asphalting, emulsions, and oxidative desulfurization, 233
Islam, 2017, A review of energy sector of Bangladesh, Energy Procedia, 110, 611, 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.193
BPDB power station statistics, 2022. Retrieved from https://bd.bpdb.gov.bd.
Gul, 2016, A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 40, 89, 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.023
Community emergency preparedness: A manual for managers and policymakers, 1999
Zavadskas, 2016, Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications for sustainability issues, Econ. Res.-Ekonomska IstraZivanjǎ, 29, 857, 10.1080/1331677X.2016.1237302
Moktadir, 2019, Key factors for energy-efficient supply chains: Implications for energy policy in emerging economies, Energy, 189, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116129
Saraswat, 2020, Evaluation of energy sources based on sustainability factors using integrated fuzzy MCDM approach, Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag.
Jawad, 2020, Analyzing enablers and barriers to successfully project control system implementation in petroleum and chemical projects, Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag.
Othman, 2016, Prioritizing HAZOP analysis using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 18, 1345, 10.1007/s10098-016-1104-4
Marhavilas, 2020, An expanded HAZOP-study with fuzzy-AHP (XPA-HAZOP technique): Application in a sour crude-oil processing plant, Saf. Sci., 124, 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104590
Marhavilas, 2020, A HAZOP with MCDM based risk-assessment approach: Focusing on the deviations with economic/health/environmental impacts in a process industry, Sustainability, 12, 993, 10.3390/su12030993
Alrifaey, 2019, Identification and prioritization of risk factors in an electrical generator based on the hybrid FMEA framework, Energies, 12, 649, 10.3390/en12040649
Jokar, 2020, Risk prioritization and selection of contractor participating in public–private partnership (PPP) infrastructure project using hybrid fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS (case study: Saveh-salafchegan freeway project), J. Construct. Eng. Manag. Innov., 3, 1, 10.31462/jcemi.2020.01001016
Singh, 2014, Major MCDM techniques and their application–A review, IOSR J. Eng., 4, 15, 10.9790/3021-04521525
Stojčić, 2019, Applications of MCDM methods in sustainability engineering: A literature review 2008–2018, Symmetry, 11, 350, 10.3390/sym11030350
Krishnan, 2019, A hierarchical model to enhance financial and strategic performance of an oil and gas company in Malaysia, Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag., 10.1108/IJESM-01-2019-0001
Gul, 2018, A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J., 24, 1723, 10.1080/10807039.2018.1424531
Kazemi, 2020, Identifying and prioritizing delay factors in Iran’s oil construction projects, Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag.
Ayağ, 2020, Fuzzy AHP-GRA approach to evaluating energy sources: A case of Turkey, Int. J. Energy Sector Manag., 10.1108/IJESM-09-2018-0012
Saffarian, 2020, Measuring the effectiveness of AHP and fuzzy AHP models in environmental risk assessment of a gas power plant, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J., 1
Ilbahar, 2018, A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system, Saf. Sci., 103, 124, 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025
Gul, 2020, Application of pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: The case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 26, 705, 10.1080/10803548.2018.1492251
Karuppiah, 2020, A fuzzy ANP–DEMATEL model on faulty behavior risks: Implications for improving safety in the workplace, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 1
Mathew, 2020, A novel approach integrating AHP and TOPSIS under spherical fuzzy sets for advanced manufacturing system selection, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 96, 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103988
Mathew, 2020, Selection of an optimal maintenance strategy under uncertain conditions: an interval type-2 fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
Demirel, 2008, Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its application, 53
Shin, 2016, Comparison of risk assessment for a nuclear power plant construction project based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, J. Build. Construct. Plan. Res., 4, 157, 10.4236/jbcpr.2016.43010
Ribas, 2019, Multi-criteria risk assessment: Case study of a large hydroelectric project, J. Cleaner Prod., 227, 237, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.043
Yucesan, 2019, Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: A model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP, Energy Policy, 126, 343, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.039
Khalilzadeh, 2020, Risk identification and prioritization in banking projects of payment service provider companies: An empirical study, Front. Bus. Res. China, 14, 1, 10.1186/s11782-020-00083-5
Tavana, 2021, An integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy multimoora model for supply chain risk-benefit assessment and supplier selection, Int. J. Syst. Sci.: Oper. Logist., 8, 238
Tavana, 2016, An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and SWOT method for outsourcing reverse logistics, Appl. Soft Comput., 40, 544, 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.005
Yazdi, 2020, Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in the process industry, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 26, 319, 10.1080/10803548.2018.1454636
Sirisawat, 2018, Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers, Comput. Ind. Eng., 117, 303, 10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.015
Islam, 2017, Current research trends and application areas of fuzzy and hybrid methods to the risk assessment of construction projects, Adv. Eng. Inf., 33, 112, 10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.001
Valipour, 2018, Risk assessment in PPP projects by applying different MCDM methods and comparative results analysis, Adm. Sci., 8, 80, 10.3390/admsci8040080
Song, 2013, Failure modes and effects analysis using integrated weight based fuzzy TOPSIS, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 26, 1172, 10.1080/0951192X.2013.785027
S.K. Ghosh, N. Zoha, F. Sarwar, A generic modem model for supplier selection for multiple decision makers using fuzzy TOPSIS, in: Conference: 5th International Conference on Engineering Research, Innovation & Education, Bangladesh, 2020.
Tyagi, 2018, Assessment of CSR based supply chain performance system using an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach, Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl., 21, 378, 10.1080/13675567.2017.1422707
Tavana, 2015, A fuzzy hybrid project portfolio selection method using data envelopment analysis, TOPSIS and integer programming, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 8432, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.057
Hunter, 2017
Licitra, 2017, Prioritizing process in action plans: A review of approaches, Curr. Pollut. Rep., 3, 151, 10.1007/s40726-017-0057-5
Rebello, 2019, An integrated approach for real-time hazard mitigation in complex industrial processes, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 188, 297, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.037
Mukeshimana, 2021, Evaluating strategies for renewable energy development in Rwanda: An integrated SWOT–ISM analysis, Renew. Energy, 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.104
Ibrahim, 2021, Integrated ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach-based factor analysis on the implementation of safety program in construction industry, Decis. Sci. Lett., 10, 139, 10.5267/j.dsl.2020.11.005
Li, 2019, Risks assessment in thermal power plants using ISM methodology, Ann. Oper. Res., 279, 89, 10.1007/s10479-018-3121-7
Anam, 2022, Modelling the drivers of solar energy development in an emerging economy: Implications for sustainable development goals, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Adv., 13
Nandal, 2019, Barriers identification and analysis of solar power implementation in Indian thermal power plants: An interpretative structural modeling approach, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 114, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109330
Lu, 2022, Risk assessment of power transmission and transformation projects based on hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS method, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2254, 10.1088/1742-6596/2254/1/012029
Marhavilas, 2022, Safety-assessment by hybridizing the MCDM/AHP & HAZOP-DMRA techniques through safety’s level colored maps: Implementation in a petrochemical industry, Alex. Eng. J., 61, 6959, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.12.040
Rehman, 2022, Risk assessment and mitigation for electric power sectors: A developing country’s perspective, Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., 36, 10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100507
Shittu, 2022, Impact of hazard recognition measures on the rate of accidents on construction sites in abuja, Nigeria, J. Build. Perform., 13
Belay, 2022, AHP based multi criteria decision analysis of success factors to enhance decision making in infrastructure construction projects, Cogent Eng., 9, 10.1080/23311916.2022.2043996
Cash, 2022, Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations, Des. Stud., 78, 10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077
Bussier, 2020, Relationship between safety measures and human error in the construction industry: Working at heights, Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., 1
Illankoon, 2019, Lockout and tag out in a manufacturing setting from a situation awareness perspective, Safety, 5, 25, 10.3390/safety5020025
Chow, 2019, Risk mitigation strategies for emergency power upgrades in critical facilities, 1
Zhao, 2015, Control measures of electrical hazards: An analysis of construction industry, Saf. Sci., 77, 143, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.001
A.Y. Ezrahovich, A.V. Vladimirtsev, I.I. Livshitz, P.A. Lontsikh, V.A. Karaseva, Risk-based thinking of ISO 9001: 2015-the new methods, approaches, and tools of risk management, in: 2017 International Conference Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies, IT & QM & IS, 2017, pp. 506–511.
O. Meixner, Fuzzy AHP group decision analysis and its application for the evaluation of energy sources, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA Vol. 29, 2009, pp. 2–16.
Kannan, 2013, Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain, J. Cleaner Prod., 47, 355, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010
Saaty, 1990, How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European J. Oper. Res., 48, 9, 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Pant, 2022, Consistency indices in analytic hierarchy process: A review, Mathematics, 10, 1206, 10.3390/math10081206
Sudarso, 2018, Applying interpretive structural modeling for design of mitigation model based on work accident risk, Def. Sci. Technol., 11
Sangode, 2020, Power distribution operational risk model driven by FMEA and ISM approach, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag.
Schmitz, 2021, Predicting major hazard accidents in the process industry based on organizational factors: A practical, qualitative approach, Process Safe. Environ. Protect., 148, 1268, 10.1016/j.psep.2021.02.040
Attri, 2018, Analysis of work-system design stage of production system life cycle using integrated ISM-MIMBI analysis, Int. J. Oper. Res., 31, 24, 10.1504/IJOR.2018.088556
Gopal, 2016, Analysing critical success factors to implement sustainable supply chain practices in Indian automobile industry: A case study, Prod. Plan. Control, 27, 1005, 10.1080/09537287.2016.1173247
Islam, 2022, Assessing energy diversification policy and sustainability: Bangladesh standpoints, Energy Strat. Rev., 40, 10.1016/j.esr.2022.100803
Panackal, 2022, Modeling the enablers and barriers to effective E-learning: A TISM approach, Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., 16, 10.3991/ijim.v16i08.29455
Priyadarshini, 2022, Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach, Oper. Manag. Res., 1
Sushil, 2018, Incorporating polarity of relationships in ISM and TISM for theory building in information and organization management, Int. J. Inf. Manage., 43, 38, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.06.003