A hybrid deep learning and ontology-driven approach to perform business process capability assessment
Tài liệu tham khảo
Purchase, 2011, Enterprise transformation: Why are we interested, what is it, and what are the challenges?, J. Enterp. Transform., 1, 14, 10.1080/19488289.2010.549289
Proper, 2013, Enterprise architecture: informed steering of enterprises in motion, 16
Aguilar-Saven, 2004, Business process modelling: Review and framework, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 90, 129, 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00102-6
Rohloff, 2011, Advances in business process management implementation based on a maturity assessment and best practice exchange, Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manage., 9, 383, 10.1007/s10257-010-0137-1
Tarhan, 2017, On the Use of Ontologies in Software Process Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review, 2
Looy, 2011, Defining business process maturity. A journey towards excellence, Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excell., 22, 1119, 10.1080/14783363.2011.624779
Team, 2002
ISO Central Secretary, 2004
ISO Central Secretary, 2015
Guédria, 2015, Maturity model for enterprise interoperability, Enterp. Inf. Syst., 9, 1, 10.1080/17517575.2013.805246
Crawford, 2007
Schumacher, 2016, A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises, Procedia Cirp, 52, 161, 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
Kim, 2021, Organizational process maturity model for IoT data quality management, J. Ind. Inf. Integr.
Feilmayr, 2016, An analysis of ontologies and their success factors for application to business, Data Knowl. Eng., 101, 1, 10.1016/j.datak.2015.11.003
Ehrlinger, 2016, Towards a definition of knowledge graphs, 1695
Proença, 2018, Formalizing ISO/IEC 15504-5 and SEI CMMI v1. 3–Enabling automatic inference of maturity and capability levels, Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 60, 13, 10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.007
Aggarwal, 2012
LeCun, 2015, Deep learning, Nature, 521, 436, 10.1038/nature14539
Sengupta, 2020, A review of deep learning with special emphasis on architectures, applications and recent trends, Knowl.-Based Syst., 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105596
Hochreiter, 1997, Long short-term memory, Neural Comput., 9, 1735, 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
Hassoun, 1995
ISO Central Secretary, 2015
Adali, 2017, Assessment of agility in software organizations with a web-based agility assessment tool, 88
Benjamin, 2017, Organizational Transparency Maturity Assessment Method, 477
Barafort, 2018, A software artefact to support standard-based process assessment: Evolution of the TIPA® framework in a design science research project, Comput. Standards Interfaces, 60, 37, 10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.009
O’Regan, 2011, SCAMPI Appraisals, 221
Tarhan, 2015, Business process maturity assessment: state of the art and key characteristics, 430
Oliva, 2016, A maturity model for enterprise risk management, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 173, 66, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.007
Proença, 2016, Maturity models for information systems-A state of the art, Procedia Comput. Sci., 100, 1042, 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.279
Schumacher, 2016, A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises, Procedia Cirp, 52, 161, 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
Cater-Steel, 2016, Decision support systems for IT service management, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci., 8, 284
Lacerda, 2018
Grambow, 2013, Automated Software Engineering Process Assessment: Supporting Diverse Models using an Ontology, Int. J. Adv. Softw., 6, 213
Krivograd, 2014, Development of an intelligent maturity model-tool for business process management, 3878
Van Looy, 2016, Business process performance measurement: a structured literature review of indicators, measures and metrics, SpringerPlus, 5, 1797, 10.1186/s40064-016-3498-1
Wen, 2008, A knowledge-based decision support system for measuring enterprise performance, Knowl.-Based Syst., 21, 148, 10.1016/j.knosys.2007.05.009
Giovannini, 2012, Ontology-based system for supporting manufacturing sustainability, Annu. Rev. Control, 36, 309, 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.09.012
Barafort, 2009
Sangaiah, 2018, Towards an efficient risk assessment in software projects–Fuzzy reinforcement paradigm, Comput. Electr. Eng., 71, 833, 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.07.022
Zhang, 2013, PLM components selection based on a maturity assessment and AHP methodology, 439
Yudatama, 2015, Evaluation maturity index and risk management for it governance using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS (case study bank XYZ), 323
J. Pöppelbuß, M. Röglinger, What makes a useful maturity model? a framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management, in: Ecis, 2011, p. 28.
Becker, 2009, Developing maturity models for IT management, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., 1, 213, 10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5
A. Maier, J. Moultrie, P.J. Clarkson, Developing maturity grids for assessing organisational capabilities: Practitioner guidance, in: 4th International Conference on Management Consulting: Academy of Management, 2009.
De Bruin, 2005, Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model
Kohlegger, 2009
Paulk, 1993, Capability maturity model, version 1.1, IEEE Softw., 10, 18, 10.1109/52.219617
Team, 2010
S. Marshall, G. Mitchell, An e-learning maturity model, in: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Auckland, New Zealand, 2002, pp. 8–11.
De Carolis, 2017, A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies, 13
Anggoro, 2018, Information system interoperability maturity model, Bull. Soc. Inform. Theory Appl., 2, 22, 10.31763/businta.v2i1.103
Santos-Neto, 2019, Enterprise maturity models: a systematic literature review, Enterp. Inf. Syst., 13, 719, 10.1080/17517575.2019.1575986
Romero, 2021, A framework for assessing capability in organisations using enterprise models, J. Ind. Inf. Integr.
ISO Central Secretary, 2015
Team, 2011
Barafort, 2014, How to design an innovative framework for process improvement? The TIPA for ITIL case, 48
Yue, 2019, Towards a smart manufacturing maturity assessment framework: a socio-technical perspective, vol. 1345
Smith, 2012, Ontology, 47
Gangemi, 2009, Ontology design patterns, 221
Guizzardi, 2007, On ontology, ontologies, conceptualizations, modeling languages
M.C. Klein, D. Fensel, Ontology versioning on the Semantic Web, in: SWWS, 2001, pp. 75–91.
Maedche, 2001, Ontology learning for the semantic web, IEEE Intell. Syst., 16, 72, 10.1109/5254.920602
Antoniou, 2004, Web ontology language: Owl, 67
Masri, 2019, Survey of rule-based systems, Int. J. Acad. Inf. Syst. Res., 3, 1
Horrocks, 2004, SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submiss., 21, 1
Sirin, 2007, Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner, Web Semant., 5, 51, 10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004
Glimm, 2014, HermiT: an OWL 2 reasoner, J. Automat. Reason., 53, 245, 10.1007/s10817-014-9305-1
Bishop, 1995
Kramer, 1991, Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks, AIChE J., 37, 233, 10.1002/aic.690370209
LeCun, 1998, Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proc. IEEE, 86, 2278, 10.1109/5.726791
Goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial nets, 2672
Giles, 1994, Dynamic recurrent neural networks: Theory and applications, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 5, 153, 10.1109/TNN.1994.8753425
Hochreiter, 2001
Manning, 1999
Almeida, 2019
Y. Bengio, J.-S. Senécal, et al., Quick Training of Probabilistic Neural Nets by Importance Sampling, in: AISTATS, 2003, pp. 1–9.
M. Baroni, G. Dinu, G. Kruszewski, Don’t count, predict! a systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors, in: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2014, pp. 238–247.
Salton, 1975, A vector space model for automatic indexing, Commun. ACM, 18, 613, 10.1145/361219.361220
Landauer, 1998, An introduction to latent semantic analysis, Discourse Process., 25, 259, 10.1080/01638539809545028
Blei, 2003, Latent dirichlet allocation, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 993
Bengio, 2003, A neural probabilistic language model, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 1137
Mikolov, 2013
Mikolov, 2013, Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality, 3111
Bojanowski, 2017, Enriching word vectors with subword information, Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist., 5, 135, 10.1162/tacl_a_00051
Pennington, 2014, Glove: Global vectors for word representation, 1532
Lok, 1997, Automated tool support for an emerging international software process assessment standard, 25
Alalwan, 2013, An Ontology-based Approach to Assessing Records Management Systems, E-Service J., 8, 24, 10.2979/eservicej.8.3.24
Ghazanfari, 2011, A tool to evaluate the business intelligence of enterprise systems, Sci. Iran., 18, 1579, 10.1016/j.scient.2011.11.011
Almeida, 2018, An ontology-based model for itil process assessment using tipa for itil, 104
da Silva Serapião Leal, 2020, A semi-automated system for interoperability assessment: an ontology-based approach, Enterp. Inf. Syst., 14, 308, 10.1080/17517575.2019.1678767
da Silva Avanzi, 2017, A framework for interoperability assessment in crisis management, J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 5, 26
Oberhauser, 2010, Leveraging semantic web computing for context-aware software engineering environments
Proença, 2019, Information governance maturity assessment using enterprise architecture model analysis and description logics, 265
Romero, 2020, Towards a characterisation of smart systems: A systematic literature review, Comput. Ind., 120, 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103224
Cambridge University Press, 2008
Peters, 2011, Fundamentals of agent perception and attention modelling, 293
Chavarría-Barrientos, 2017, Achieving the sensing, smart and sustainable “everything”, 575
Baader, 2003
Treveil, 2020
Kotsiantis, 2007, Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques, Emerg. Artif. Intell. Appl. Comput. Eng., 160, 3
Klatt, 2005, You don’t have to think twice if you carefully tokenize, 299
Srivastava, 2014, Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1929
Ng, 2004, Feature selection, L1 vs. L2 regularization, and rotational invariance, 78
Von Alan, 2004, Design science in information systems research, MIS Q., 28, 75, 10.2307/25148625
Hevner, 2007, A three cycle view of design science research, Scand. J. Inf. Syst., 19, 4
Leal, 2019, An ontology for interoperability assessment: A systemic approach, J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 16
ISO Central Secretary, 2004
Institute, 2004
Brickley, 2014
Manola, 2004, RDF primer, W3C Recomm., 10, 6
Musen, 2015, The protégé project: a look back and a look forward, AI Matters, 1, 4, 10.1145/2757001.2757003
ISO Central Secretary, 2015, ISO 9001: Quality management systems - Requirements
2018, 1
Naudet, 2010, Towards a systemic formalisation of interoperability, Comput. Ind., 61, 176, 10.1016/j.compind.2009.10.014
Bertalanffy, 1968
Kingma, 2014
Hawkins, 2004, The problem of overfitting, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44, 1, 10.1021/ci0342472
Chollet, 2021
OMG, 2011
