A hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets-based AHP approach for analyzing the performance evaluation factors: an application to cargo sector

Complex & Intelligent Systems - Tập 3 Số 3 - Trang 167-175 - 2017
Fatih Tüysüz1, Berna Şimşek2
1Department of Industrial Engineering, İstanbul University, Istanbul, 34320, Turkey
2Graduate School (Institute) of Science, İstanbul University, Istanbul, 34320, Turkey

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bartolacci MR, LeBlanc LJ, Kayikci Y, Grossman TA (2012) Optimization modeling for logistics: options and implementations. J Bus Logist 33(2):118–127

Simsek B, Tuysuz F (2015) Simulation approach for modeling and analyzing the technological transfer center in a cargo company. In: 2015 6th international conference on modeling, simulation, and applied optimization (ICMSAO), pp 1–6. IEEE

Domingues ML, Reis V, Macário R (2015) A comprehensive framework for measuring performance in a third-party logistics provider. Transp Res Proc 10:662–672

Islam DMZ, Meier JF, Aditjandra PT, Zunder TH, Pace G (2013) Logistics and supply chain management. Res Transp Econ 41(1):3–16

Hong J, Chin AT, Liu B (2004) Logistics outsourcing by manufacturers in China: a survey of the industry. Transp J 43(1):17–25

Prajogo D, Chowdhury M, Yeung AC, Cheng TCE (2012) The relationship between supplier management and firm’s operational performance: a multi-dimensional perspective. Int J Prod Econ 136(1):123–130

Fu HP, Chang TH, Shieh L, Lin A, Lin SW (2015) Applying DEA-BPN to enhance the explanatory power of performance measurement. Syst Res Behav Sci 32(6):707–720

Rushton A, Croucher P, Baker P (2014) The handbook of logistics and distribution management: understanding the supply chain, 5th edn. Kogan Page Publishers, The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport, London

Ozcan T, Tuysuz F (2016) Modified grey relational analysis integrated with grey dematel approach for the performance evaluation of retail stores. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 15(02):353–386

Chou TY, Hsu CL, Chen MC (2008) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection. Int J Hosp Manag 27(2):293–301

Kahraman C, Ruan D, Dogan I (2003) Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Inf Sci 157:135–153

Cagrı TA, Tuysuz F, Kahraman C (2013) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for retail location selection. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 12(04):729–755

Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):7326–7333

Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

Kayakutlu G, Buyukozkan G (2011) Assessing performance factors for a 3PL in a value chain. Int J Prod Econ 131(2):441–452

Zhang J, Tan W (2012) Research on the performance evaluation of logistics enterprise based on the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Proc 14:1618–1623

Shaik MN, Abdul-Kader W (2014) Comprehensive performance measurement and causal-effect decision making model for reverse logistics enterprise. Comput Indus Eng 68:87–103

da Silveira Guimarães JL, Salomon VAP (2015) ANP applied to the evaluation of performance indicators of reverse logistics in footwear industry. Proc Comput Sci 55:139–148

Kucukaltan B, Irani Z, Aktas E (2016) A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry. Comput Hum Behav 65:346–358

Özceylan E, Çetinkaya C, Erbaş M, Kabak M (2016) Logistic performance evaluation of provinces in Turkey: a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 94:323–337

Posset M, Gronalt M, Hauslmayer H (2010) COCKPIIT–Clear operable and comparable key performance indicators for intermodal transportation. Study as an Annex to the Final Project Report, Wien

Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539

Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York

Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 2009. FUZZ-IEEE 2009, pp 1378–1382. IEEE

Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2012) The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process. In: Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, US, pp 23–40

Xu Z, Liao H (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):749–761

Leung LC, Cao D (2000) On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 124(1):102–113

Wang TC, Chen YH (2008) Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP. Inf Sci 178(19):3755–3765

Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119

Mousavi SM, Gitinavard H, Siadat A (2014) A new hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method for decision-making problems under uncertainty. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM), pp 622–626. IEEE

Zhu B, Xu Z (2014) Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 239(3):794–801

Zhu B, Xu Z, Zhang R, Hong M (2016) Hesitant analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 250(2):602–614

Öztaysi B, Onar SÇ, Boltürk E, Kahraman C (2015) Hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp 1–7. IEEE

Onar SÇ, Büyüközkan G, Öztayşi B, Kahraman C (2016) A new hesitant fuzzy QFD approach: an application to computer workstation selection. Appl Soft Comput 46:1–16

Zhou W, Xu Z (2016) Asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relations in the analytic hierarchy process. Inf Sci 358:191–207

Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109–119

Rodríguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2013) A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 241:28–42

Yavuz M, Oztaysi B, Onar SC, Kahraman C (2015) Multicriteria evaluation of alternative-fuel vehicles via a hierarchical hesitant fuzzy linguistic model. Expert Syst Appl 42(5):2835–2848

Li D, Zeng W, Li J (2015) New distance and similarity measures on hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision making. Eng Appl Artif Intell 40:11–16

Wang H, Xu Z (2016) Total orders of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: definitions, generations and applications. Knowl Based Syst 107:142–154

He Y, Xu Z, Gu J (2016) An approach to group decision making with hesitant information and its application in credit risk evaluation of enterprises. Appl Soft Comput 43:159–169