A goal-oriented approach for supporting input/output determination in regulatory benchmarking

Lowry, 2009, Statistical benchmarking in utility regulation: Role, standards and methods, Energy Policy, 37, 1323, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.027 Charnes, 1978, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European J. Oper. Res., 2, 429, 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 Agrell, 2017, Regulatory benchmarking: Models, analyses and applications, Data Envel. Anal. J., 3, 49, 10.1561/103.00000017 Haney, 2013, International benchmarking of electricity transmission by regulators: A contrast between theory and practice?, Energy Policy, 62, 267, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.042 Jamasb, 2000, Benchmarking and regulation: International electricity experience, Util. Policy, 9, 107, 10.1016/S0957-1787(01)00010-8 Mesquita, 2017 Nillesen, 2010, Using regulatory benchmarking techniques to set company performance targets: The case of US electricity, Compet. Regul. Netw. Ind., 11, 50 2018 Pamplona, 2018 Llorca, 2016, Efficiency and environmental factors in the US electricity transmission industry, Energy Econ., 55, 234, 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.004 Llorca, 2016, Using the latent class approach to cluster firms in benchmarking: An application to the US electricity transmission industry, Oper. Res. Perspect., 1, 6 Agrell, 2013 ANEEL, Technical note no. 012/2019–SRM/ANEEL, 2019, . Accessed on 04/11/2022. Afsharian, 2016, Generalized DEA: an approach for supporting input/output factor determination in DEA, Benchmark.: Int. J., 23, 1892, 10.1108/BIJ-07-2015-0074 Wagner, 2007, Stepwise selection of variables in data envelopment analysis: Procedures and managerial perspectives, European J. Oper. Res., 180, 57, 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.02.048 Färe, 2004, Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment, European J. Oper. Res., 157, 242, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00191-7 Cook, 2006, Dual-role factors in data envelopment analysis, IIE Trans., 38, 105, 10.1080/07408170500245570 Vilela, 2019 Thanassoulis, 2001 Belton, 1993, Demystifying DEA – A visual interactive approach based on multiple criteria analysis, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 44, 883 San Cristóbal, 2011, A multi criteria data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the efficiency of the renewable energy technologies, Renew. Energy, 36, 2742, 10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.008 Cook, 2014, Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model, Omega, 44, 1, 10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004 Ahn, 2014, An insight into the specification of the input-output set for DEA-based bank efficiency measurement, Manage. Rev. Q., 64, 3, 10.1007/s11301-013-0098-9 Ahn, 2015, DEA efficiency of German savings banks: evidence from a goal-oriented perspective, J. Bus. Econ., 85, 953 Dyckhoff, 2001, Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA), European J. Oper. Res., 132, 312, 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00154-5 Eisenführ, 2010 Dyckhoff, 2018, Multi criteria production theory: Foundation of non-financial and sustainability performance evaluation, J. Bus. Econ., 88, 851 Dyckhoff, 2010, Verallgemeinerte DEA-Modelle zur Performanceanalyse, Z. Betriebswirtschaft, 80, 1249, 10.1007/s11573-010-0407-x Cooper, 2003, Stakeholder communication and the internet in UK electricity companies, Manage. Audit. J., 18, 232, 10.1108/02686900310469925 Jansson, 2010, Deregulation and the stakeholder model, Corp. Gov., 10, 129, 10.1108/14720701011035657 Lucena, 2004, Estratégias competitivas no setor elétrico brasileiro: Uma análise dos interesses e expectativas dos atores da CHESF, Rev. Adm. Contemp., 8, 131, 10.1590/S1415-65552004000500008 Nichiforel, 2011, Stakeholder analysis of the Romanian forest sector, Ann. Univ. Suceava, 1, 114 2016 ANEEL, Atlas da Energia Elétrica do Brasil, third ed., Brasília, 2008, . Accessed on 04/11/2022. Dyson, 2001, Pitfalls and protocols in DEA, European J. Oper. Res., 132, 245, 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1 Mukhlynina, 2020, The choice of valuation techniques in practice: Education versus profession, Crit. Finance Rev., 9, 201, 10.1561/104.00000088 Afsharian, 2019, Pitfalls in estimating the X-factor: The case of energy transmission regulation in Brazil, Socioecon. Plan. Sci., 65, 1, 10.1016/j.seps.2018.04.004 ANEEL, Technical note no. 049/2007–SRE/ANEEL, 2007, . Accessed on 04/11/2022. ANEEL, Technical note no. 394/2009–SRE/ANEEL, 2009, . Accessed on 04/11/2022. Lopes, 2020, The evolution of the benchmarking methodology data envelopment analysis-DEA in the cost regulation of the Brazilian electric power transmission sector: a critical look at the renewal of concessions, Gest. Prod., 27, 1, 10.1590/0104-530x3940-20 ANEEL, Technical note no. 160/2017–SRM/ANEEL, 2017, . Accessed on 04/11/2022. Podinovski, 2004, Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 55, 1311, 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601794 Villanueva-Cantillo, 2021, Methodology for calculating critical values of relevance measures in variable selection methods in data envelopment analysis, European J. Oper. Res., 290, 657, 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.021 Wong, 2021, A global search method for inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis: Procedures and managerial perspectives, Symmetry, 1155, 10.3390/sym13071155 Xie, 2021, A two-stage method for improving discrimination and variable selection in DEA models, IMA J. Manag. Math. Machek, 2013, International experience with productivity benchmarking in the regulation of public utilities, 451 Liu, 2018, Promoting energy and environmental efficiency within a positive feedback loop: Insights from global value chain, Energy Policy, 121, 175, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.024 Giannakis, 2005, Benchmarking and incentive regulation of quality of service: An application to the UK electricity distribution networks, Energy Policy, 33, 2256, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.021 Corton, 2016, The low cost of quality improvements in the electricity distribution sector of Brazil, Energy Policy, 97, 485, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.052