A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK

Agbenyega, 2009, Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands, Land Use Policy, 26, 551, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011 Asah, 2012, Involving forest communities in identifying and constructing ecosystem services: millennium assessment and place specificity, J. Forest., 110, 149, 10.5849/jof.11-054 Bagstad, 2014, From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments, Ecol. Soc., 19, 64, 10.5751/ES-06523-190264 Brugha, 2000, Stakeholder analysis: a review, Health Policy Plann., 15, 239, 10.1093/heapol/15.3.239 Bryman, 2012 Costanza, 2008, Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed, Biol. Conserv., 141, 350, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020 Dandy, 2017, Who has a stake in ash dieback? A conceptual framework for the identification and categorization of tree health stakeholders Danley, 2016, Evaluating conceptual definitions of ecosystem services and their implications, Ecol. Econ., 126, 132, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.003 de Lopez, 2001, Stakeholder management for conservation projects: a case study of Ream National Park, Cambodia, Environ. Manage., 28, 47, 10.1007/s002670010206 Denscombe, 2014 Duggan, 2013, Identifying functional stakeholder clusters to maximise communication for the ecosystem approach to fisheries management, Mar. Policy, 42, 56, 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.01.023 Egoh, 2008, Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 127, 135, 10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013 Elgin, 2013, A stakeholder analysis of Colorado climate and energy issues using policy analytical capacity and the advocacy coalition framework, Rev. Policy Res., 30, 114, 10.1111/ropr.12005 FAO, 2005 Fisher, 2009, Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, Ecol. Econ., 68, 643, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 Forestry Commission, 2008. Public Forest Estate – Stakeholder List [Online]. Forestry Commission [Accessed 10/06/2013 2013]. Forestry Commission, 2017 Freeman, 1984 Friedman, 2006 Garrido, 2017, Stakeholder perspectives of wood-pasture ecosystem services: a case study from Iberian dehesas, Land Use Policy, 60, 324, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.022 Grimble, 1994 Grimble, R., Chan, M.-K., Aglionby, J., Quan, J., 1995. Trees and trade-offs: a stakeholder approach to natural resource management. In: Gatekeeper Series No. 52. International Institute for Environment and Development, London. Grimble, 1993 Grimble, 1997, Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of concepts, contexts, experiences and opportunities, Agric. Syst., 55, 175, 10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1 Harrison, 2010, Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 2791, 10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x Hein, 2006, Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services, Ecol. Econ., 57, 209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005 IDPF, 2012 IUCN, 1995 Jacobs, 2016, A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions, Ecosyst. Serv., 22, 213, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007 Jupp, 2006 Kandziora, 2013, Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution, Ecosyst. Serv., 4, 47, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001 La Notte, 2017, Ecosystem services classification: a systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework, Ecol. Ind., 74, 392, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030 Lawrence, 2014, Private landowners’ approaches to planting and managing forests in the UK: what’s the evidence?, Land Use Policy, 36, 351, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.002 Lienert, 2013, Stakeholder analsyis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes, J. Environ. Manage., 125, 134, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052 Liv, 2014, Valuing ecosytem services in community-based landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing based approach, Landscape Ecol., 29, 1347, 10.1007/s10980-014-0045-8 Loft, 2015, Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities, Ecosyst. Serv., 16, 150, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002 MA, 2005 Maguire, 2012, The role of stakeholders in the marine planning process – stakeholder analysis within the Solent, United Kingdom, Mar. Policy, 36, 246, 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.05.012 Marzano, 2015, Part of the solution? Stakeholder awareness, information and engagement in tree health issues, Biol. Invasions, 17, 1961, 10.1007/s10530-015-0850-2 Mills, 2011, Integrating natural and social science perspectives on plant disease risk, management and policy formulation, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 366, 2035, 10.1098/rstb.2010.0411 Mitchell, 1990 Muradian, 2012, Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 1, 93, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009 NEA, 2011 ODI, 2004, Strengthening poverty reduction programmes using an actor-oriented approach: examples from natural resources innovation systems Oteros-Rozas, 2017, Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites, Ecol. Indic., 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009 Paavola, 2013, Ecosystem services, governance, and stakeholder participation: an introduction, Ecol. Soc., 18, 42, 10.5751/ES-06019-180442 Prell, 2010, Competing structure, competing views: the role of formal and informal social structures in shaping stakeholder perceptions, Ecol. Soc., 15, 34, 10.5751/ES-03652-150434 Quine, 2011 Raffaelli, 2013 Raum, 2017, The ecosystem approach, ecosystem services and established forestry policy approaches in the United Kingdom, Land Use Policy, 64, 282, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.030 Raum, 2018, Reasons for adoption and advocacy of the ecosystem services concept in UK forestry, Ecol. Econ., 143, 47, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.001 Raum, 2015, Forestry paradigms and policy change: the evolution of forestry policy in Britain in relation to the ecosystem approach, Land Use Policy, 49, 462, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.021 Reed, 2009, Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 1933, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 Sandström, 2016, Understanding consistencies and gaps between desired forest futures: an analysis of visions from stakeholder groups in Sweden, Ambio, 45, 100, 10.1007/s13280-015-0746-5 Sarkki, 2017, Social equity in governance of ecosystem services: synthesis from European treeline areas, Clim. Res., 70, 1 Savin-Baden, 2013 Seppelt, 2011, A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead, J. Appl. Ecol., 48, 630, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x Smith, 1999 Smith, 2001, Great Britain: new forecast of softwood availability, For. Br. Timber, 30, 20 Urquhart, 2010, Private ownership and public good provision in English woodlands, Small-scale For., 9, 1, 10.1007/s11842-009-9098-y Vlami, 2017, Cultural landscapes and attributes of “culturalness” in protected areas: an exploratory assessment in Greece, Sci. Total Environ., 1, 229, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.211 Wong, J., Lawrence, A., Urquhart, J., Feliciano, D., Slee, B., 2015. Forest Land Ownership Change in the United Kingdom. COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Report. Vienna.