A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques

Avison DE, Fitzgerald G (1995) Information systems development: methodologies, techniques, and tools, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, London

Agarwal R, Sinha A, Tanniru M (1996) Cognitive fit in requirements engineering: a study of object and process models. J Manag Inf Syst 13(2):137?162

Agarwal R, De P, Sinha AP (1999) Comprehending object and process models: an empirical study. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 25(4):541?556

Batra D, J Hoffer, R Bostrom (1990) Comparing representations with relational and EER models. Commun ACM 33(2):126?139

Bodart F, Sim M, Patel A, Weber R (2001) Should optional properties be used in conceptual modelling? A theory and three empirical tests. Inf Syst Res 12(4):384?405

Brooks FP (1998) The mythical man-month: essays of software engineering, Anniversary edition. Addison-Wesley

Brosey M, Schniederman B (1978) Two experimental comparisons of relational and hierarchical database models. Int J Man Machine Stud 10:625?637

Bubenko JA Jr (1986) Information system methodologies: a research review. In: Olle TW, Sol HG, Verrjin-Stuart AA (eds) Information system design methodologies: improving the practice. Elsevier, North Holland, pp 289?317

Burton-Jones A, Meso P (2002) How good are these UML diagrams? An empirical test of the Wand and Weber good decomposition model. In: Applegate L, Galliers R, DeGross JI (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on information systems 2002, December, 2002

Chaos (1995) Standish group report on information system development. http://www.standishgroup.com/chaos.html. Accessed 12 Jul 1996]

Collins AM, Quillan MR (1969) Retrieval time from semantic memory. J Verbal Learn Behav 8:240?247

Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Q 13(3):319?340

Floyd C (1986) A comparative evaluation of systems development methods. In: Olle TW, Sol HG, Verrjin-Stuart AA (eds) Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on comparative review of information systems design methodologies: improving the practice. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 19?54

Gemino A (1999) Empirical comparison of system analysis techniques. PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia

Gemino A (2004) Empirical comparisons of animation and narration in requirements validation. Req Eng J 9(3):153?168. DOI 10.1007/s00766-003-0182-0

Gemino A, Wand Y (2003) Evaluation of modeling techniques based on models of learning. Commun ACM 46(10):79?84

Jarvenpaa S, Machesky J (1989) Data analysis and learning: an experimental study of data modeling tools. Int J Man Mach Stud 31:367?391

Johnson J, Boucher KD, Connors K, Robinson J (2001) The criteria for success. Softw Mag 21(1):s3?s8

Kim YG, March S (1995) Comparing data modeling formalisms. Commun ACM 38(4):103?115

Kim J, Hahn J, Hahn H (2000) How do we understand a system with (so) many diagrams? Cognitive integration processes in diagrammatic reasoning. Info Syst Res 11(3):284?303

Kung CH, Solvberg A (1986) Activity modelling and behaviour modelling. In: Olle TW, Sol HG, Verrjin-Stuart AA (eds) Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on comparative review of information systems design methodologies: improving the practice. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 145?171

Larkin J, Simon HA (1987) When a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn Sci 11(1):65?99

Mayer RE (1989) Models for understanding. Rev Educ Res 59(1):43?64

Mayer RE (2001) Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York

Moore GC, I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 2(3):192?222

Morris MG, Spier C, Hoffer JA (1999) An examination of procedural and object-oriented system analysis methods: does prior experience help or hinder performance. Decis Sci 30(1):107?136

Mylopoulos J (1992) Conceptual modeling and telos. In: Loucopoulos P, Zicari R (eds) Conceptual modeling, databases, and case: an integrated view of information systems development, chap 2. Wiley, New York, pp 49?68

Norman D (1986) Cognitive engineering. In: Norman D, Draper S (eds) User centered design: new perspectives on human computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 31?61

Nosek J, Ahrens J (1986) An experiment to test user validation of requirements: data flow diagrams vs. task oriented menus. Int J Man Mach Stud 25:675?684

Oei JLH, van Hemmen LJ, Falkenberg ED, Brinkkemper S (1992) The meta model hierarchy: a framework for information systems concepts and techniques. Technical Report No. 92-17, Department of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Katholieke Universiteir, Nijmegen, pp 1?30

Ramsey R, Atwood M, Van Doren J (1993) Flowcharts versus program design languages: an experimental comparison. Commun ACM 26(6):445?449

Siau KL (1996) Empirical studies in information modeling. PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia

Vessey I, Conger S (1994) Requirements specification: learning object, process, and data methodologies. Commun ACM 37(5):102?113

Wand Y, Weber R (1993) On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. J Inf Syst 3:217?237

Wand Y, Weber R (1995) On the deep structure of information systems. Inf Syst J 5:203?223

Wand Y, Weber R (2002) Information systems and conceptual modeling a research agenda. Inf Syst Res 13(4):203?223

Wang S (1996) Two MIS analysis methods: an experimental comparison. J Educ Bus Jan/Feb:136?141

Yadav S, Bravoco R, Chatfield A, Rajkumar T (1988) Comparison of analysis techniques for information requirements determination. Commun ACM 31(9):1090?1097