A feminist ethos for caring knowledge production in transdisciplinary sustainability science

Adams M, Klinsky S, Chhetri N (2020) Barriers to sustainability in poor marginalized communities in the United States: the criminal justice, the prison-industrial complex and foster care systems. Sustainability 12(1):220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010220 Adelman S (2018) The sustainable development goals, anthropocentrism and neoliberalism. In: French D, Kotzé LJ (eds) Sustainable development goals: law, theory and implementation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Northampton, pp 15–40 Ahmed S (2017) Living a feminist life. Duke University Press, Durham ATD Fourth World (2021) Merging Knowledge. Inclusive processes lead to chance. https://www.atd-fourthworld.org/what-we-do/participation/merging-knowledge/ Accessed 20 Aug 2021 Atkinson-Graham M, Kenney M, Ladd K, Murray CM, Simmonds EA-J (2015) Care in context: becoming an STS researcher. Soc Stud Sci 45(5):738–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715600277 Ballet J, Petit E, Pouchain D (2018) What mainstream economics should learn from the ethics of care. Oecon 8:187–208. https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.3257 Balvanera P, Daw TM, Gardner TA, Martín-López B, Norström AV, Ifejika Speranza C, Spierenburg M, Bennett EM, Farfan M, Hamann M, Kittinger JN, Luthe T, Maass M, Peterson GD, Perez-Verdin G (2017) Key features for more successful place-based sustainability research on social-ecological systems: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) perspective. Ecol Soc 22:14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08826-220114 Bayfield H, Colebrooke L, Pitt H, Pugh R, Stutter N (2019) Awesome women and bad feminists: the role of online social networks and peer support for feminist practice in academia. Cult Geogr 27(3):415–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474019890321 Becker E, Hummel D, Jahn T (2011) Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse als Rahmenkonzept. In: Groß M (ed) Handbuch Umweltsoziologie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 75–96 Berg M, Seeber BK (2017) The slow professor. Challenging the culture of speed in the academy. University of Toronto Press, Toronto Bergold J, Thomas S (2012) Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion. Forum Qualitative Social Research 13(1). Art. 30. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201302. Accessed 16 Aug 2021 Bieling C, Eser U, Plieninger T (2020) Towards a better understanding of values in sustainability transformations: ethical perspectives on landscape stewardship. Ecosyst People 16:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1786165 Blackman RC, Bruder A, Burdon FJ, Convey P, Funk WC, Jähnig SC, Kishe MA, Moretti MS, Natugonza V, Pawlowski J, Stubbington R, Zhang X, Seehausen O, Altermatt F (2020) A meeting framework for inclusive and sustainable science. Nat Ecol Evol 4:668–671. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1190-x Böhm A, Ullrich J (2019) Animal Encounters. Kontakt, Interaktion und Relationalität. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart Bowell T (2011) Feminist standpoint theory. In: Fieser J, Dowden B (eds) Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/fem-stan/. Accessed 3 Jan 2020 Brandt P, Ernst A, Gralla F, Luederitz C, Lang DJ, Newig J, Reinert F, Abson DJ, von Wehrden H (2013) A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 92:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008 Bray R, de Laat M, Godinot X, Ugarte A, Walker R (2019) The hidden dimensions of poverty. Fourth World Publications, Montreuil. https://www.atd-quartmonde.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Hidden-Dimensions-of-Poverty-20-11-2019.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2021 Bray R, de Laat M, Godinot X, Ugarte A, Walker R (2020) Realising poverty in all its dimensions: a six-country participatory study. World Dev 134:105025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105025 Brock J (2021) Textbook case of disability discrimination in grant applications. In: Nature Index. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/textbook-case-of-disability-discrimination-in-research-grant-applications?fbclid=IwAR3_bQo2MscZ1VMcM9mBgRLWHZQ6exdSkyBM3qI7AzcB-pwneO8pe4SfSKE. Accessed 9 Apr 2021 Caniglia G, Luederitz C, Wirth T, Fazey I, Martín-López B, Hondrila K, König A, Wehrden H, Schäpke NA, Laubichler MD, Lang DJ (2021) A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability. Nat Sustain 4:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z Care O, Bernstein MJ, Chapman M et al (2021) Creating leadership collectives for sustainability transformations. Sustain Sci 16:703–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00909-y Chilisa B (2017) Decolonising transdisciplinary research approaches: an African perspective for enhancing knowledge integration in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 12:813–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0461-1 Clifford D (2013) Ethics, politics and the social professions: Reading Iris Marion Young. Ethics Soc Welf 7(1):36–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2012.667139 Corner A, Shaw C, Clarke J (2018) Principles for effective communication and public engagement on climate change. A Handbook for IPCC authors. Climate Outreach, Oxford Cornwall A, Fujita M (2012) Ventriloquising ‘the Poor’? Of voices, choices and the politics of ‘participatory’ knowledge production. Third World Q 33(9):1751–1765. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.721274 Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol 1989, Iss. 1, Article 8 Crenshaw K (2017) On Intersectionality. Essential writings. The New Press, New York Cunsolo A, Ellis NR (2018) Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nat Clim Chang 8:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2 Cunsolo A, Harper SL, Minor K, Hayes K, Williams KG, Howard C (2020) Ecological grief and anxiety: the start of a healthy response to climate change? Lancet Planet Health 4(7):261–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30144-3 Datta K, Mcllwaine C, Evans Y, Herbert J, May J, Wills J (2010) A migrant ethic of care? Negotiating care and caring among migrant workers in London’s low-pay economy. Fem Rev 94:93–116. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2009.54 Davis K (2020) Who owns intersectionality? Some reflections on feminist debates on how theories travel. Eur J Women’s Stud 27(2):113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506819892659 Dedeurwaerdere T (2014) Sustainability science for strong sustainability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, van Oudenhoven APE, van der Plaat F, Schröter M, Lavorel S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew S, Erpul G, Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359:270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826 Dietz R, Busch S, Teodorovici D (2021) Conflicts as catalytical elements in transdisciplinary knowledge production. Trialog 137:23–30. https://international-urbanism.de/site/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/TRIALOG-137-2021_Dietz-et-al.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2021 Dolmage J (2017) Academic ableism. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor Donovan J, Adams CJ (eds) (2007) The feminist care tradition in animal ethics. Columbia University Press, New York Dotson K (2011) Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia 26(2):236–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x Edwards R, Mauthner M (2012) Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice. In: Miller T, Birch M, Mauthner M, Jessop J (eds) Ethics in qualitative research, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, London, pp 14–28 Elmhirst R (2015) Feminist political ecology. In: Perreault TA, Bridge G, McCarthy J (eds) Routledge handbook of political ecology. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 519–530 Environmental Justice Atlas (2021) Frequently Asked Questions: What is this Project About? https://ejatlas.org/about. Accessed 16 Aug 2021 Fam D, Smith T, Cordell D (2017) Being a transdisciplinary researcher: skills and dispositions fostering competence in transdisciplinary research and practice. In: Fam D, Palmer J, Riedy C, Mitchell C (eds) Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability outcomes. Routledge, London, pp 77–92 Fischer J, Riechers M (2021) From grief to hope in conservation. Conserv Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13737 Fischer J, Ritchie EG, Hanspach J (2012) Academia’s obsession with quantity. Trends Ecol Evol 27(9):473–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.010 Fritz L, Binder CR (2020) Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research. Eur J Futures Res 8:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-020-0161-4 Fritz L, Meinherz F (2020) Tracing power in transdisciplinary sustainability research: an exploration. Gaia 29(1):41–51. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.1.9 Gaard G (2015) Ecofeminism and climate change. Women’s Stud Int Forum 49:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.02.004 Gaard G (2017a) Critical ecofeminism. Lexington Books, Lanham Gaard G (2017b) Feminism and environmental justice. In: Holifield R, Chakraborty J, Walker G (eds) The Routledge handbook of environmental justice. Routledge, London, pp 74–88 Gaard G (2017c) Posthumanism, ecofeminism, and inter-species relations. In: MacGregor S (ed) Routledge handbook of gender and environment. Routledge, London, pp 115–129 Galafassi D, Daw TM, Thyresson M, Rosendo S, Chaigneau T, Bandeira S, Munyi L, Gabrielsson I, Brown K (2018) Stories in social-ecological knowledge cocreation. Ecol Soc 23(1):23. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09932-230123 Ghosh A (2020) Deconstructing a 2-year long transdisciplinary sustainability project in Northern universities: is rhetorical nobility obscuring procedural and political discords? Sustain Sci 15(4):1111–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00816-8 Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Di Giulio A, Defila R, Brückmann T (2016) »Das ist halt das eine … Praxis, das andere ist Theorie«: Prinzipien transdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit im Forschungsalltag. In: Di Giulio A, Defila R (eds) Transdisziplinär forschen - zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp 189–288 Godinot X, Walker R (2020) Poverty in all its forms: determining the dimensions of poverty through merging knowledge. In: Beck V, Hahn H, Lepenies R (eds) Dimensions of poverty philosophy and poverty, vol 2. Springer, Cham, pp 263–279 Gordon TAC, Radford AN, Simpson SD (2019) Grieving environmental scientists need support. Science 366(6462):193. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz2422 Goring SJ, Whitney KS, Jacob AL (2018) Accessibility is imperative for inclusion. Front Ecol Environ 16:63–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1771 Gottschlich D (2017) Soziale Ökologie: Charakteristika, Besonderheiten, kritisch-emanzipatorische Erweiterungspotenziale. fiph Journal 29:4–13 Gottschlich D, Katz C (2016) Sozial-ökologische Transformation braucht Kritik an den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen: Zur notwendigen Verankerung von Nachhaltigkeitsforschung in feministischer Theorie und Praxis. SuN 2:1–18 Gottschlich D, Katz C (2018) Caring with nature/s: Care als Transformationspraxis für die Gestaltung gesellschaftlicher Naturverhältnisse. In: Onnen C, Rode-Breymann S (eds) Wiederherstellen - unterbrechen - verändern? Politiken der (Re-)Produktion. 1st edition. Barbara Budrich, Opladen Berlin, pp 191–210 Gottschlich D, Katz C (2019) Caring with Nature/s: Zur transformativen Bedeutung von Care in More Than Human Worlds. https://www.akademie-solidarische-oekonomie.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Manuskript_Gottschlich_Katz-Care-Transformation.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2020 Govrin A (2014) From ethics of care to psychology of care: reconnecting ethics of care to contemporary moral psychology. Front Psychol 5:1135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01135 Graham S, Baldwin C, McKay J, Jackson S (2017) Justice approaches: methods and methodology in environmental justice research. University of Wollongong, Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities. Papers: 61. https://ro.uow.edu.au/asshpapers/61. Accessed 16 Aug 2021 Grummell B, Devine D, Lynch K (2009) The care-less manager: gender, care and new managerialism in higher education. Gend Educ 21:191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802392273 Hamington M, Sander-Staudt M (2011) Applying care ethics to business. Springer, Dordrecht Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud 14(3):575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066 Haraway DJ (2016) Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham Harding SG (2004) The feminist standpoint theory reader Intellectual and political controversies. Routledge, New York Harmin M, Barrett MJ, Hoessler C (2017) Stretching the boundaries of transformative sustainability learning: on the importance of decolonizing ways of knowing and relations with the more-than-human. Environ Educ Res 23(10):1489–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1263279 Hartmann AC (2019) Disability inclusion enhances science. Science 366:698. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz0271 Heinberg R, Lerch D (2010) The post carbon reader: managing the 21st century’s sustainability crises. Watershed Media, Healdsburg, CA, Post Carbon Institute, Santa Rosa, CA Held V (1995) Justice and care. Essential readings in feminist ethics. Westview Press, Oxford Held V (2006) The ethics of care. Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press, Oxford Held V (2009) The ethics of care. In: Copp D (ed) The Oxford handbook of ethical theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford Hesse-Biber SN, Piatelli D (2012) The feminist practice of holistic reflexivity. In: Hesse-Biber S (ed) Handbook of feminist research: theory and praxis. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 557–582 Hill Collins P (1991) Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge, New York Hofmeister S (2017) Transdisciplinarity in social-ecological research. Constraints, challenges and opportunities: reflections on personal experience. In: Padmanabhan M (ed) Transdisciplinary research and sustainability: collaboration, innovation and transformation. Routledge, London, pp 66–82 Hofmeister S, Katz C, Mölders T (2013) Grundlegungen im Themenfeld Geschlechterverhältnisse und Nachhaltigkeit. In: Hofmeister S, Katz C, Mölders T (eds) Geschlechterverhältnisse und Nachhaltigkeit Die Kategorie Geschlecht in den Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften. Budrich, Opladen Berlin Toronto, pp 33–76 Hummel D, Stieß I (2017) Social ecology: a transdisciplinary approach to gender and environment research. In: MacGregor S (ed) Routledge handbook of gender and environment. Routledge, London, pp 186–201 Iniesta-Arandia I, Ravera F, Buechler S, Díaz-Reviriego I, Fernández-Giménez ME, Reed MG, Thompson-Hall M, Wilmer H, Aregu L, Cohen P, Djoudi H, Lawless S, Martín-López B, Smucker T, Villamor GB, Wangui EE (2016) A synthesis of convergent reflections, tensions and silences in linking gender and global environmental change research. Ambio 45:383–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0843-0 Intemann K (2016) Feminist standpoint. In: Disch L, Hawkesworth M (eds) The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford IPBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva. Is This How You Feel (2020) This Is How Scientists Feel. https://www.isthishowyoufeel.com/this-is-how-scientists-feel.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2021 Ives CD, Freeth R, Fischer J (2020) Inside-out sustainability: the neglect of inner worlds. Ambio 49(1):208–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01187-w Jaggar AM (1989) Love and knowledge: emotion in feminist epistemology. Inquiry 32(2):151–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748908602185 Jarosz L (2014) Considering sovereignty, care ethics and policy in food politics. Dialogues Hum Geogr 4(2):229–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614537162 Jax K, Calestani M, Chan KMA, Eser U, Keune H, Muraca B, O’Brien L, Potthast T, Voget-Kleschin L, Wittmer H (2018) Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 35:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009 Kaijser A, Kronsell A (2014) Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Env Polit 23(3):417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.835203 Kaijser A, Kronsell A (2016) Who gets to know about nature? Biodiversity and ecosystem services through an intersectional lens. FZG 22(2):41–67. https://doi.org/10.3224/fzg.v22i2.27056 Katz C, Heilmann S, Thiem A, Moths K, Koch LM, Hofmeister S (2015) Fazit und Ausblick. In: Katz C, Heilmann S, Thiem A, Moths K, Koch LM, Hofmeister S (eds) Nachhaltigkeit anders denken. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp 281–298 Kingston AK (2019) Feminist research ethics. In: Iphofen R (ed) Handbook of research ethics and scientific integrity. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–19 Kittay EF (1999) Love’s Labor: essays on women, equality and dependence. Routledge, New York Kittay EF (2011) The ethics of care, dependence, and disability. Ratio Juris 24(1):49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x Koggel C, Orme J (2010) Care ethics: new theories and applications. Ethics Soc Welf 4(2):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2010.484255 Kohl E, McCutcheon P (2015) Kitchen table reflexivity: negotiating positionality through everyday talk. Gend Place Cult 22(6):747–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.958063 König A (2017) Sustainability science as a transformative social learning process. In: König A, Ravetz JR (eds) Sustainability science, 1st edn. Routledge, London, pp 3–28 Kosanic A, Petzold J, Dunham A, Razanajatovo M (2019) Climate concerns and the disabled community. Science 366:698–699. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9045 Kosanic A, Hansen N, Zimmermann-Janschitz S, Chouinard V (2018) Researchers with disabilities in the academic system. In: AAG Newsletter. http://news.aag.org/2018/09/researchers-with-disabilities-in-the-academic-system/. Accessed 9 Apr 2021 Laland KN (2020) Racism in academia, and why the “little things” matter. Nature 584(7822):653–654. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02471-6 Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x Larrington-Spencer H, Fenney D, Middlemiss L, Kosanic A (2021) Disabled environmentalisms. In: Bell K (ed) Diversity and inclusion in environmentalism. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 15–33 Leach DK (2013) Prefigurative politics. In: Snow DA, Della Porta D, Klandermans B, McAdam D (eds) The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford Lee EM (2017) ‘“Where people like me don’t belong”’: faculty members from low-socioeconomic-status backgrounds. Sociol Educ 90(3):197–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717710495 Leventon J, Roelich K, Middlemiss L (2019) An academic mother’s wish list: 12 things universities need. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00019-x Lipton B, Mackinlay E (2017) We only talk feminist here. Feminist academics, voice and agency in the neoliberal university. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham Little MO (1995) Seeing and caring: the role of affect in feminist moral epistemology. Hypatia 10(3):117–137 Löhr K, Hochmuth C, Graef F, Wambura J, Sieber S (2016) Conflict management programs in trans-disciplinary research projects: the case of a food security project in Tanzania. Food Sec 9(6):1189–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0643-1 Lumsden K (2019) Reflexivity. Theory, method, and practice. Routledge, London Macy J, Johnstone C (2012) Active hope. How to face the mess we’re in without going crazy. New World Library, Novato Madge C (1993) Boundary disputes: comments on Sidaway (1992). Area 25–299 Maeve MK (1997) Nursing practice with incarcerated women: caring within mandated alienation. Issues Ment Health Nurs 18(5):495–510. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612849709009426 Malin SA, Ryder SS (2018) Developing deeply intersectional environmental justice scholarship. Environ Sociol 4(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1446711 Mancilla García M, Hertz T, Schlüter M, Preiser R, Woermann M (2020) Adopting process-relational perspectives to tackle the challenges of social-ecological systems research. Ecol Soc 25(1):29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11425-250129 Manemann J (2014) Kritik des Anthropozäns. Plädoyer für eine neue Humanökologie. Transcript, Bielefeld Masterson VA, Mahajan SL, Tengö M (2018) Photovoice for mobilizing insights on human well-being in complex social-ecological systems: case studies from Kenya and South Africa. Ecol Soc 23(3):13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10259-230313 Mathews F (2017) The dilemma of dualism. In: MacGregor S (ed) Routledge handbook of gender and environment. Routledge, London, pp 54–70 McMillan N (2017) Care ethics and political theory. Contemp Polit Theory 16(3):430–433. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-016-0068-9 Menton M, Larrea C, Latorre S, Martinez-Alier J, Peck M, Temper L, Walter M (2020) Environmental justice and the SDGs: from synergies to gaps and contradictions. Sustain Sci 15:1621–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8 Merriam Webster Dictionary (2020) ethos. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ethos. Accessed 20 Feb 2020 Mintz B, Rothblum ED (2013) Lesbians in academia. Routledge, New York Montesanti S, Abelson J, Lavis JN, Dunn JR (2016) Enabling the participation of marginalized populations: case studies from a health service organization in Canada. Health Promot Int 32(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav118 Moriggi A, Soini K, Bock BB, Roep D (2020a) Caring in, for, and with nature: an integrative framework to understand green care practices. Sustainability 12(8):3361. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083361 Moriggi A, Soini K, Franklin A, Roep D (2020b) A care-based approach to transformative change: ethically-informed practices, relational response-ability and emotional awareness. Ethics Policy Environ 23(3):281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848186 Mortlock B (1996) The business of caring: practice nurses in primary health care. Master's dissertation, University of Canterbury. Mountz A, Bonds A, Mansfield B, Loyd J, Hyndman J, Walton-Roberts M, Basu R, Whitson R, Hawkins R, Hamilton T, Curran W (2015) For slow scholarship: a feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME 14(4):1235–1259 Nagendra H, Bai X, Brondizio ES, Lwasa S (2018) The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability. Nat Sustain 1(7):341–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0101-5 NaWik (2021). Seminars in English. https://www.nawik.de/seminare/seminars-in-english_virtual_on_site/ Accessed 16 Aug 2021 Niccolini AD, Ringrose J (2020) Feminist posthumanism. In: Atkinson P, Delamont S, Cernat A, Sakshaug JW, Williams RA (eds) SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications, London Niedernhuber M, Haroon H, Brown N (2021) Disabled scientists’ networks call for more support. Nature 591:34. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00544-8 Nixon R (2013) Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Noddings N (1984) Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press, Berkeley Norström AV, Cvitanovic C, Löf MF, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, Bednarek AT, Bennett EM, Biggs R, de Bremond A, Campbell BM, Canadell JG, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Fulton EA, Gaffney O, Gelcich S, Jouffray J-B, Leach M, Le Tissier M, Martín-López B, Louder E, Loutre M-F, Meadow AM, Nagendra H, Payne D, Peterson GD, Reyers B, Scholes R, Speranza CI, Spierenburg M, Stafford-Smith M, Tengö M, van der Hel S, van Putten I, Österblom H (2020) Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat Sustain 3(3):182–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2 Osborne N (2015) Intersectionality and kyriarchy: a framework for approaching power and social justice in planning and climate change adaptation. Plan Theory 14(2):130–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213516443 Osinski A (2021a) Towards a critical sustainability science? Participation of disadvantaged actors and power relations in transdisciplinary research. Sustainability 13:266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031266 Osinski A (2021b) From consultation to co-production: a comparison of participation in poverty research. J Particip Res Methods 2(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.18875 Paasche Ø, Österblom H (2019) Unsustainable science. One Earth 1(1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.011 Perezgonzalez JD, Frías-Navarro D, Pascual-Llobell J (2018) Book review: another science is possible. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00455 Pettibone L, Blättel-Mink B, Balázs B, Di Giulio A, Göbel C, Heubach K, Hummel D, Lundershausen J, Lux A, Potthast T, Vohland K, Wyborn C (2018) Transdisciplinary sustainability research and citizen science: options for mutual learning. Gaia 27(2):222–225. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.2.9 Plieninger T, Fagerholm N, Bieling C (2021) How to run a sustainability science research group sustainably? Sustain Sci 16:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00857-z Plumwood V (1993) Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge, London Powell K (2017) Work–life balance: break or burn out. Nature 545(7654):375–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7654-375a Puig de la Bellacasa M (2012) ‘Nothing comes without its world’: thinking with care. Sociol Rev 60(2):197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x Puig de la Bellacasa M (2017) Matters of care Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis Raatikainen KJ, Juhola K, Huhmarniemi M, Peña-Lagos H (2020) ‘Face the cow’: reconnecting to nature and increasing capacities for pro-environmental agency. Ecosyst People 16(1):273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1817151 Reisch LA (2015) Time policies for a sustainable society. Springer, Cham Riechers M, Henkel W, Engbers M, Fischer J (2019) Stories of favourite places in public spaces: emotional responses to landscape change. Sustainability 11(14):3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143851 Riechers M, Balázsi Á, García-Llorente M, Bieling C, Burgos-Ayala A, Chakroun L, Mattijssen TJM, Muhr M, Pérez-Ramírez I, Raatikainen KJ, Rana S, Richardson M, Rosengren L, West S (2021) Key advantages of the leverage points perspective to shape the human-nature relations. Ecosyst People 17(1):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1912829 Rocheleau D, Thomas-Slayter B, Wangari E (eds) (1996) Feminist political ecology: global issues and local experience. Routledge, London Rose H (1983) Hand, brain, and heart: a feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs 9(1):73–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/494025 Rose G (1997) Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Prog Hum Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122 Rosendahl J, Zanella MA, Rist S, Weigelt J (2015) Scientists’ situated knowledge: strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity. Futures 65:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.011 Salskov SA (2020) A Critique of Our Own? On Intersectionality and ‘Epistemic Habits’ in a Study of Racialization and Homonationalism in a Nordic Context. NORA Nordic J Femin Gender Res 28(3):251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2020.1789218 Sander-Staudt M (2019) Care ethics. In: Fieser J, Dowden B (eds) Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/care-eth/. Accessed 25 Feb 2020 Schaal A (2018) Science must rise up to support people like me. Nature 556:275. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-04598-z Scheidel A, Del Bene D, Liu J, Navas G, Mingorría S, Demaria F, Avila S, Roy B, Ertör I, Temper L, Martínez-Alier J (2020) Environmental conflicts and defenders: a global overview. Glob Environ Change 63:102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104 Schmidt L, Neuburger M (2017) Trapped between privileges and precariousness: tracing transdisciplinary research in a postcolonial setting. Futures 93:54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.07.005 Schneidewind U, Singer-Brodowski M, Augenstein K (2016) Transformative science for sustainability transitions. In: Brauch HG, Oswald Spring Ú, Grin J, Scheffran J (eds) Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace. Springer, Cham, pp 123–136 Sellberg MM, Cockburn J, Holden PB, Lam DPM (2021) Towards a caring transdisciplinary research practice: navigating science, society and self. Ecosyst People 17(1):292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1931452 Serrato Marks G (2018) How to make professional conferences more accessible for disabled people: guidance from actual disabled scientists. Union of Concerned Scientists Blog (8 November 2018). https://go.nature.com/3qFFV2i. Accessed 11 Aug 2021 Serrato Marks G, Bayer S (2019) Our disabilities have made us better scientists. In: Scientific American Blog Network. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/our-disabilities-have-made-us-better-scientists/. Accessed 9 Apr 2021 Serrato Marks G, Solomon C, Stack Whitney K (2021) Meeting frameworks must be even more inclusive. Nat Ecol Evol 5:552. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01437-9 Sevenhuijsen S (1998) Citizenship and the ethics of care. Feminist considerations on justice, morality, and politics. Routledge, London Sherwood G (1993) A qualitative analysis of patient responses to caring: Basis for a caring practice. In: Gaut D (ed) Caring: a global agenda. National League for Nursing Press, New York, pp 243–256 Siebenhüner B (2018) Conflicts in transdisciplinary research: reviewing literature and analysing a case of climate adaptation in northwestern Germany. Ecol Econ 154:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.011 Smith DE (1987) The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. Northeastern University Press, Boston Snyder MG (1995) Feminist theory and planning theory: lessons from feminist epistemologies. Plan J 10:1. https://doi.org/10.5070/BP310113063 Spivak GC (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: Nelson C, Grossberg L (eds) Marxism and the interpretation of culture. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp 271–313 Stein R (ed) (2004) New perspectives on environmental justice: gender, sexuality, and activism. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick Stengers I (2017) Another science is possible. A manifesto for slow science. Polity, Cambridge Sturm BA (2004) Ethics and care: an ethnographic study of psychiatric community health nursing practice. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 18(3):106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2004.03.006 Swanson HA (2020) Multispecies research. In: Atkinson P, Delamont S, Cernat A, Sakshaug JW, Williams RA (eds) SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036833388 TallBear K (2011) Why Interspecies Thinking Needs Indigenous Standpoints. Society for Cultural Anthropology. The Human is More Than Human Series. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/why-interspecies-thinking-needs-indigenous-standpoints. Accessed 09 Aug 2021 Tengö M, Hill R, Malmer P, Raymond CM, Spierenburg M, Danielsen F, Elmqvist T, Folke C (2017) Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26–27:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005 The Care Operative (2020) Outbreaks, break-outs and break-times: creating caring online workshops. In: Integr Implement Insights. https://i2insights.org/2020/06/16/caring-online-workshops/. Accessed 18 Aug 2021 Thiem A, Katz C (2015) Nachhaltigkeitskompetenz und Gender – Anforderungen und Hindernisse für Spitzen- und Nachwuchskräfte in nachhaltigkeitsorientierten Tätigkeitsbereichen. In: Katz C, Heilmann S, Thiem A, Moths K, Koch LM, Hofmeister S (eds) Nachhaltigkeit anders denken. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp 231–254 Tran D, Martinez-Alier J, Navas G, Mingorria S (2020) Gendered geographies of violence: a multiple case study analysis of murdered women environmental defenders. J Political Ecol 27(1):1189–1212. https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23760 Tronto JC (1993) Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge, New York Tronto JC (2013) Caring democracy Markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press, New York Truman SE (2020) Feminist new materialisms. In: Atkinson P, Delamont S, Cernat A, Sakshaug JW, Williams RA (eds) SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036808740 Tsing AL (2015) The mushroom at the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press, Princeton Tuosto K, Johnston JT, Connolly C, Lo C, Sanganyado E, Winter KA, Roembke T, Richter WE, Isaacson KJ, Raitor M, Kosanic A, Bessone L, Heim AB, Srivastava P, Hughes PW, Aamodt CM (2020) Making science accessible. Science 367(6473):34–35. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6129 Turnhout E, Bloomfield B, Hulme M, Vogel J, Wynne B (2012) Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature 488(7412):454–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/488454a Turnhout E, Metze T, Wyborn C, Klenk N, Louder E (2020) The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 42:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009 van den Berg K (2018) Environmental feminisms: a story of different encounters. In: Bauhardt C, Harcourt W (eds) Feminist political ecology and the economics of care: in search of economic alternatives. Routledge, London, pp 55–69 Vickery J (2018) Using an intersectional approach to advance understanding of homeless persons’ vulnerability to disaster. Environ Sociol 4(1):136–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2017.1408549 Vilsmaier U, Lang DJ (2014) Transdisziplinäre Forschung. In: Heinrichs H, Michelsen G (eds) Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–113 Walsh Z, Böhme J, Wamsler C (2021) Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education. Ambio 50:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01322-y Ward C, Holmes G, Stringer L (2018) Perceived barriers to and drivers of community participation in protected-area governance. Conserv Biol 32(2):437–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13000 Warren KJ (2014) Feminist environmental philosophy. In: Zalta EN (ed) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/feminism-environmental/. Accessed 12 Feb 2020 West S, Haider LJ, Stålhammar S, Woroniecki S (2020) A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosyst People 16:304–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417 White C, Bailey C (2004) Feminist knowledge and ethical concerns: towards a geography of situated ethics. Espace Popul Soc 1:131–141. https://doi.org/10.4000/eps.568 Wiek A, Lang DJ (2016) Transformational sustainability research methodology. In: Heinrichs H, Martens WJM, Michelsen G, Wiek A (eds) Sustainability science An introduction. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–41 Wingrove E (2015) Materialisms. In: Disch LJ, Hawkesworth ME (eds) The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford Winslow S, Davis SN (2016) Gender inequality across the academic life course. Sociol Compass 10(5):404–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12372 Young IM (1997) Feminism and the public sphere. Constellations 3(3):340–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.1997.tb00064.x Zafra-Calvo N, Balvanera P, Pascual U, Merçon J, Martín-López B, Noordwijk M, Mwampamba TH, Lele S, Speranza CI, Arias-Arévalo P, Cabrol D, Cáceres DM, O’Farrell P, Subramanian SM, Devy S, Krishnan S, Carmenta R, Guibrunet L, Kraus-Elsin Y, Moersberger H, Cariño J, Díaz S (2020) Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: insights from the Global South. Glob Environ Change 63:102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102115 Ziegler R, Ott K (2011) The quality of sustainability science: a philosophical perspective. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 7(1):31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2011.11908063