A dual measure of correlation between the Solow residual and output growth

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 37 - Trang 17-25 - 2011
Dandan Liu1, Rui Li2, Jijun Tan3
1Department of Economics, Kent State University, Kent, USA
2School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
3School of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China

Tóm tắt

In this paper, we measure U.S. technology shocks by implementing a dual approach, which is based on price data instead of aggregate quantity data. By doing so, we find the relative volatility of technology shocks and the correlation between output fluctuation and technology shocks to be much smaller than those revealed in most real-business-cycle (RBC) studies. Our results support the findings of Burside et al. (Eur Econ Rev 40:861–869, 1996), who showed that the correlation between technology shocks and output is exaggerated in the RBC literature. This suggests that one should examine other sources of fluctuations for a better understanding of the business cycle phenomena.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barro RJ (1999) Notes on growth accounting. J Econ Growth 4:119–137 Burside AC, Eichenbaum MS, Rebelo ST (1996) Sectoral Solow residuals. Eur Econ Rev 40:861–869 Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (2008) The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press, Oxford Gollin D (2002) Getting income shares right. J Polit Econ 110:458–474 Gomme P, Greenwood J (1995) On the cyclical allocation of risk. J Econ Dyn Control 19(1):91–124 Hall RE, Jorgenson DW (1967) Tax policy and investment behavior. Am Econ Rev 57(3):391–414 Hsieh C-T (2002) What explains the industrial revolution in east asia? Evidence from the factor markets. Am Econ Rev 92(3):501–526 Hulten CR, Wykoff FC (1981) The measurement of economic depreciation. In: Hulten CR (ed) Depreciation, inflation and the taxation of income from capital. Urban Institute, Washington DC Kumbhakar S, Lovellz CAK (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge Kydland FE, Prescott EC (1982) Time to build an aggregate fluctuation. Econometrica 50(6):1345–1370 Kydland FE, Prescott EC (1991) The econometrics of the general equilibrium approach to the business cycle. Scand J Econ 93:161–178 Mankiw G (1989) Real business cycle: a new Keynesian perspective. J Econ Perspect 3:79–90 Prescott EC (1986) Theory ahead of business cycle measurement. Q Rev (Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis) Summers LH (1986) Some skeptical observations on real business cycle theory. Q Rev (Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis) Young A (1995) The Tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical reality of the east Asian growth experience. Q J Econ 110(3):641–680