A double-porosity slug test model for a sloping fracture zone
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander M, Berg SJ, Illman WA (2011) Field study of hydrogeologic characterization methods in a heterogeneous aquifer. Ground Water 49(3):365–382
Audouin O, Bodin J (2008) Cross-borehole slug test analysis in a fractured limestone aquifer. J Hydrol 348:510–523
Barenblatt GI, Zheltov YP, Kochina IN (1960) Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks. J Appl Math Mech (PMM) 24(5):1286–1303
Barker JA (1988) A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock. Water Resour Res 24(10):1796–1804
Barker JA, Wright TEJ, Fretwell BA (2000) A pulsed-velocity method of double porosity solute transport modeling. In: Dassargues A (ed) Tracers and modeling in hydrogeology. IAHS Pub 262, Liege, pp 297–302
Black JH (1985) The interpretation of slug tests in fissured rocks. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 18:161–171
Boussinesq J (1877) Essaisur la théorie des eauxcourantes. Mém.présentésdivers savants. Acad Sci Inst Fr 23:1–680
Bredehoeft JD, Cooper HH, Papadopulos IS (1966) Inertial and storage effects in well-aquifer systems: an analog investigation. Water Resour Res 2:697–707
Butler JJ Jr (1998) The design, performance, and analysis of slug tests. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
Butler JJ Jr, Zhan X (2004) Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers. Water Resour Res 40(12):W12402
Butler JJ Jr, Garnett EJ, Healey JM (2003) Analysis of slug tests in formations of high hydraulic conductivity. Ground Water 41(5):620–630
Chen CS (2006) An analytic data analysis method for oscillatory slug tests. Ground Water 44(4):604–608
Chen CS, Wu CR (2006) Analysis of depth-dependent pressure head of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers. Ground Water 44:472–477
Chen CS, Sie YC, Lin YT (2012) A review of the multilevel slug test for characterizing aquifer heterogeneity. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 23(2):131–143
Cooper HH Jr, Bredehodft JD, Papadopulos IS (1967) Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resour Res 3(1):263–269
de Hoog FR, Knight JH, Stokes AN (1982) An improved method for numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. S.I.A.M. J Sci Stat Comput 3:357–366
Dougherty DE, Babu DK (1984) Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir. Water Resour Res 20(8):1116–1122
Franklin WS, Zhang H (2003) Fundamentals of ground water. Wiley, New York, pp 72–75
Grader AS, Ramey HJ Jr (1988) Slug test analysis in dual porosity reservoirs. SPE Form Eval 3:329–339
Kabala ZJ, Pinder GF, Milly PCD (1985) Analysis of well-aquifer response to a slug test. Water Resour Res 21(9):1433–1436
Kipp KL (1985) Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test. Water Resour Res 21(9):1397–1408
Mateen K, Ramey HJ Jr. (1984) Slug test data analysis in reservoirs with double porosity behavior. SPE Paper 12779, Society of Petroleum Engineers
McElwee CD, Zenner MA (1998) A nonlinear model for analysis of slug-test data. Water Resour Res 34(1):55–66
McWhorter DB, Sunada DK (1977) Ground-water hydrology and hydraulics. Water Resour Publ, Fort Collins CO
Moench AF (1984) Double-porosity models for a fissured groundwater reservoir with fracture skin. Water Resour Res 20(7):831–846
Novakowski KS, Bickerton GS (1997) Borehole measurement of the hydraulic properties of low permeability rock. Water Resour Res 33(11):2509–2517
Ostendorf DW, DeGroot DJ, Dunaj PJ, Jakubowski J (2005) A closed form slug test theory for high permeability aquifers. Ground Water 43(1):87–101
Ross HC, McElwee CD (2007) Multi-level slug tests to measure 3-D hydraulic conductivity distributions. Nat Resour Res 16(1):67–79
Sageev A, Ramey HJ Jr. (1986) On slug test analysis in double-porosity reservoirs. SPE Paper15479, Society of Pelroleum Engineers
Singhal BBS, Gupta RP (2010) Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks. Springer, New York, pp 237–289
Streltsova TD (1988) Well testing in heterogeneous formations. Wiley, New York, pp 369–391
van der Kamp G (1976) Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: the underdamped case. Water Resour Res 12(1):71–77
Wylie CR, Barrett LC (1982) Advanced engineering mathematics, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York
Zlotnik VA, McGuire VL (1998) Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations: 1.modification of the Springer-Gelhar (SG) model. J Hydrol 204(1):271–282