A double-porosity slug test model for a sloping fracture zone

Ying Liu1, Jingli Shao1, Yali Cui1
1School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander M, Berg SJ, Illman WA (2011) Field study of hydrogeologic characterization methods in a heterogeneous aquifer. Ground Water 49(3):365–382

Audouin O, Bodin J (2008) Cross-borehole slug test analysis in a fractured limestone aquifer. J Hydrol 348:510–523

Barenblatt GI, Zheltov YP, Kochina IN (1960) Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks. J Appl Math Mech (PMM) 24(5):1286–1303

Barker JA (1988) A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock. Water Resour Res 24(10):1796–1804

Barker JA, Black JH (1983) Slug tests in fissured aquifers. Water Resour Res 19(6):1558–1564

Barker JA, Wright TEJ, Fretwell BA (2000) A pulsed-velocity method of double porosity solute transport modeling. In: Dassargues A (ed) Tracers and modeling in hydrogeology. IAHS Pub 262, Liege, pp 297–302

Black JH (1985) The interpretation of slug tests in fissured rocks. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 18:161–171

Boussinesq J (1877) Essaisur la théorie des eauxcourantes. Mém.présentésdivers savants. Acad Sci Inst Fr 23:1–680

Bredehoeft JD, Cooper HH, Papadopulos IS (1966) Inertial and storage effects in well-aquifer systems: an analog investigation. Water Resour Res 2:697–707

Butler JJ Jr (1998) The design, performance, and analysis of slug tests. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

Butler JJ Jr, Zhan X (2004) Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers. Water Resour Res 40(12):W12402

Butler JJ Jr, Garnett EJ, Healey JM (2003) Analysis of slug tests in formations of high hydraulic conductivity. Ground Water 41(5):620–630

Chen CS (2006) An analytic data analysis method for oscillatory slug tests. Ground Water 44(4):604–608

Chen CS, Wu CR (2006) Analysis of depth-dependent pressure head of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers. Ground Water 44:472–477

Chen CS, Sie YC, Lin YT (2012) A review of the multilevel slug test for characterizing aquifer heterogeneity. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 23(2):131–143

Cooper HH Jr, Bredehodft JD, Papadopulos IS (1967) Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resour Res 3(1):263–269

de Hoog FR, Knight JH, Stokes AN (1982) An improved method for numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. S.I.A.M. J Sci Stat Comput 3:357–366

Dougherty DE, Babu DK (1984) Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir. Water Resour Res 20(8):1116–1122

Franklin WS, Zhang H (2003) Fundamentals of ground water. Wiley, New York, pp 72–75

Grader AS, Ramey HJ Jr (1988) Slug test analysis in dual porosity reservoirs. SPE Form Eval 3:329–339

Hantush MS (1966) Wells in homogeneous anisotropic aquifer. Water Resour Res 2(2):273–279

Kabala ZJ, Pinder GF, Milly PCD (1985) Analysis of well-aquifer response to a slug test. Water Resour Res 21(9):1433–1436

Kipp KL (1985) Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test. Water Resour Res 21(9):1397–1408

Mateen K, Ramey HJ Jr. (1984) Slug test data analysis in reservoirs with double porosity behavior. SPE Paper 12779, Society of Petroleum Engineers

McElwee CD, Zenner MA (1998) A nonlinear model for analysis of slug-test data. Water Resour Res 34(1):55–66

McWhorter DB, Sunada DK (1977) Ground-water hydrology and hydraulics. Water Resour Publ, Fort Collins CO

Moench AF (1984) Double-porosity models for a fissured groundwater reservoir with fracture skin. Water Resour Res 20(7):831–846

Novakowski KS, Bickerton GS (1997) Borehole measurement of the hydraulic properties of low permeability rock. Water Resour Res 33(11):2509–2517

Ostendorf DW, DeGroot DJ, Dunaj PJ, Jakubowski J (2005) A closed form slug test theory for high permeability aquifers. Ground Water 43(1):87–101

Ross HC, McElwee CD (2007) Multi-level slug tests to measure 3-D hydraulic conductivity distributions. Nat Resour Res 16(1):67–79

Sageev A, Ramey HJ Jr. (1986) On slug test analysis in double-porosity reservoirs. SPE Paper15479, Society of Pelroleum Engineers

Singhal BBS, Gupta RP (2010) Applied hydrogeology of fractured rocks. Springer, New York, pp 237–289

Streltsova TD (1988) Well testing in heterogeneous formations. Wiley, New York, pp 369–391

van der Kamp G (1976) Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: the underdamped case. Water Resour Res 12(1):71–77

Warren JE, Root PJ (1963) The behaviour of naturally fractured reservoirs. Soc Pet J 3(3):245–255

Wylie CR, Barrett LC (1982) Advanced engineering mathematics, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York

Zlotnik VA, McGuire VL (1998) Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations: 1.modification of the Springer-Gelhar (SG) model. J Hydrol 204(1):271–282

Zurbuchen BR, Zlotnik VA, Butler JJ (2002) Dynamic interpretation of slug test in highly permeable aquifers. Water Resour Res 38(3):7