A dosimetric comparison between CyberKnife and tomotherapy treatment plans for single brain metastasis

La radiologia medica - Tập 122 - Trang 392-397 - 2017
Daniela Greto1, Stefania Pallotta2, Laura Masi3, Cinzia Talamonti2, Livia Marrazzo2, Raffaella Doro3, Calogero Saieva4, Silvia Scoccianti1, Isacco Desideri1, Lorenzo Livi1
1Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
2Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
3Medical Physics Unit, I.F.C.A., Florence, Italy
4Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, ISPO (Cancer Research and Prevention Institute), Florence, Italy

Tóm tắt

Radiosurgery (RS) is a well-established treatment in selected patients with brain metastasis. The aim of this study is to compare the differences between CyberKnife (CK) and TomoTherapy (HT) treatment plans of RS of single brain metastasis (BM) to define when HT should be used in cases beyond Cyberknife—when both systems are readily available for the radiation oncologist. Nineteen patients with single brain metastasis treated with CK were re-planned for radiosurgery using TomoTherapy Hi-ART system. Two planning approaches have been used for TomoTherapy plans: the classical one (HT) and the improved conformity (icHT) that produces dose distributions more similar to those of RS plans. PTV coverage, Conformity Index (CI), Paddick Conformity Index (nCI), Homogeneity Index (HI), Gradient Index (GI), and beam on time of CK, HT, and icHT plans were evaluated and compared. A good coverage was found for CK, HT, and icHT plans. A difference between mean HI of CK and icHT plans was observed (p = 0.007). Better dose gradients compared to both icHT and HT modalities were observed in CK plans. icHT modality showed improved mean CI respect to HT modality, similar to that obtained in CK plans. CK plans show higher conformity and lower GI than icHT and HT plans. TomoTherapy demonstrates the advantage of being a device capable to reach different clinical objectives depending on the different planning modality employed. CyberKnife and TomoTherapy are both optimal RS devices, the choice to use one over another has to be clinically guided.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Eichler AF, Loeffler JS (2007) Multidisciplinary management of brain metastases. Oncologist 12(7):884–898 Sperduto PW, Chao ST, Sneed PK et al (2010) Diagnosis-specific prognostic factors, indexes, and treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis of 4259 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:655–661 Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M et al (2006) Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 295:2483–2491 Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U et al (2011) Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952-26001 study. J Clin Oncol 29:134–141 Tsao MN, Rades D, Wirth A et al (2012) Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis (es): an American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2:210–225 Brown PD, Brown CA, Pollock BE et al (2002) Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with “radioresistant”brain metastases. Neurosurgery 51:656–665 Chang EL, Selek U, Hassenbusch SJIII et al (2005) Outcome variation among so called “radioresistant” brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 56:936–945 Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Shuto T et al (2014) Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901):a multi institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 15(4):387–395 Soisson ET, Hoban PW, Kammeyer T et al (2011) A technique for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning with helical TomoTherapy. Med Dosim 36(1):46–56 Baumert BG, Rutten I, Dehing-Oberije C et al (2006) A pathology-based substrate for target definition in radiosurgery of brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(1):187–194 Hoogeman MS, Nuyttens JJ, Levenda G et al (2008) Time dependence of intrafraction patient motion assessed by repeat stereoscopic imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:1313–1319 Drabick DM, MacKenzie MA, Fallone GB (2007) Quantifying appropriate PTV setup margins: analysis of patient setup fidelity and intrafraction motion using post-treatment megavoltage computed tomography scans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:1222–1228 Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L et al (2000) Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brainmetastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(2):291–298 Gladwish A, Oliver M, Craig J et al (2007) Segmentation ad leaf sequencing for intensity modulated arc therapy. Med Phys 34(5):1779–1788 Lomax NJ, Scheib SG (2003) Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment panning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55(5):1409–1419 Kubo HD, Wilder RB, Pappas CTE (1999) Impact of collimator leaf width on stereotactic radiosurgery and 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:937–945 Han C, Liu A, Schultheiss TE et al (2006) Dosimetric comparisons of Helical Tomotherapy treatment plans and step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiosurgery treatment plans in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(2):608–616 Bauman G, Yartsev S, Fisher B et al (2007) Simultaneous infield boost with helical TomoTherapy for patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 30(1):38–40 McGuinnes CM, Gottschalk AR, Lessard E et al (2015) Investigating the clinical advantages of a robotic linac equipped with a multileaf collimator in the treatment of brain and prostate cancer patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys 16(5):284–295 Nakamura JL, Verhey LJ, Smith V et al (2001) Dose conformity of gamma knife radiosurgery and risk factors for complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51(5):1313–1319 Leith JT, Cook S, Chougule P et al (1994) Intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of human tumors relevant to radiosurgery: comparative cellular radiosensitivity and hypoxic percentages. Acta Neurochir Suppl 62:18–27 Tome W, Fowler J (2000) Selective boosting of tumor sub-volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48(2):593–599 Kohutek ZA, Yamada Y, Chan TA et al (2015) Long-term risk of radionecrosis and imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. J Neurooncol 125(1):149–156 Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D et al (1992) Radiosurgery and brain tolerance: an analysis of neurodiagnostic imaging changes after gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:19–26 Blonigen BJ, Steinmetz RD, Levin L et al (2010) Irradiated volume as a predictor of brain radionecrosis after linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:996–1001 Minniti G, Clarke E, Lanzetta G et al (2011) Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis. Radiat Oncol 6:48