A dialogue on the ethics of science: Henri Poincaré and Pope Francis

European Journal for Philosophy of Science - Tập 11 - Trang 1-12 - 2021
Nicholas Matthew Danne1
1University of South Carolina, Philosophy Department, Columbia, USA

Tóm tắt

To teach the ethics of science to science majors, I follow several teachers in the literature who recommend “persona” writing, or the student construction of dialogues between ethical thinkers of interest. To engage science majors in particular, and especially those new to academic philosophy, I recommend constructing persona dialogues from Henri Poincaré’s essay, “Ethics and Science” (1963/1913), and the non-theological third chapter of Pope Francis’s (2015) encyclical on the environment, Laudato si. This pairing of interlocutors offers two advantages. The first is that science students are likely to recognize both names, since Poincaré appears in undergraduate mathematics and physics textbooks, and because Francis is an environmentalist celebrity. Hence students (in my experience) show more interest in these figures than in other philosophers. The second advantage is that the third chapter of Laudato si reads like an implicit rebuttal of Poincaré’s essay in many respects, and so contriving a dialogue between those authors both facilitates classroom discussion, and deserves attention from professional ethicists in its own right. In this paper, I present my own contrived dialogue between Francis and Poincaré, not for assigning to students as a reading, but as a template for an effective assignment product, and as a crib sheet for educators to preview the richly antiparallel themes between the two works.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Atherton, J. M. (1998). Persona Approach Brings Philosophers and Students to Life. College Teaching, 46(1), 7–11. Barrotta, P. (2018). Hume’s ‘Law’ and the Ideal of Value-Free Science. In Scientists, Democracy and Society: A Community of Inquirers. 1–19. Springer International Publishing. Basu, R. (2019). The Wrongs of Racist Beliefs. Philosophical Studies, 176(9), 2497–2515. Ben-Menahem, Y. (2006). Conventionalism: From Poincaré to Quine. Cambridge University Press. Chakravartty, A. (1998). Semirealism. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 29(3), 391–408. de Condorcet, J. A. N. M. (1976). Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind. In Condorcet: Selected Writings, edited and translated by Keith Michael Baker, 209–282. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Daly, A. (2016). Merleau-Ponty and the Ethics of Intersubjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan. Dettloff, D. (2017). Catholic Air Conditioning: Laudato si’ and the Overcoming of Phenomenology. The Heythrop Journal LVIII: 931–941. Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G. J., & van de Poel, I. (2018). Philosophy of Technology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/technology/ Handley, G. B. (2016). Laudato si’ and the Postsecularism of the Environmental Humanities. Environmental Humanities, 8(2), 277–284. Iheka, C. (2017). Pope Francis’ Integral Ecology and Environmentalism for the Poor. Environmental Ethics, 39, 243–259. Ivanova, M. (2015). Conventionalism about what? Where Duhem and Poincaré part ways. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 54, 80–89. Kelsen, H. (1991). Poincaré's Conception of the Relation between Science and Morality. In General Theory of Norms, trans. Michael Hartney: 87–88. New York: Oxford University Press. Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding Philosophy of Science. Routledge. McArthur, D. (2006). Recent Debates over Structural Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 37, 209–224. McGuigan, C. (2019). Wonder Opens the Heart: Pope Francis and Lisa Sideris on Nature, Encounter, and Wonder. Zygon, 54(2), 396–408. Nix, E. (2019). Tuskegee Experiment: The Infamous Syphilis Study. History, July 29, 2019. https://www.history.com/news/the-infamous-40-year-tuskegee-study Poincaré, H. (1963). Ethics and Science. In Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, trans. John W. Bolduc: 102–113. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. Pope Francis. (2015). Laudato si’ (Praise be to you, my Lord). [Online] Available: http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html Punzi, V. L. (2018). A Social Responsibility Guide for Engineering Students and Professionals of all Faith Traditions: An Overview. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1253–1277. Reno, R. R. (2015). The Return of Catholic Anti-Modernism. At First Things, https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2015/06/the-return-of-catholic-anti-modernism, 18 Jun 2015. Sedmak, C. (2017). Traditional Concerns, New Language? Reflections on Laudato si. The Heythrop Journal LVIII: 942–952. Szerszynski, B. (2016). Praise Be to You, Earth-Beings. Environmental Humanities, 8(2), 291–297. Vallor, S. (2015). Moral Deskilling and Upskilling in a New Machine Age: Reflections on the Ambiguous Future of Character. Philosophy & Technology, 28, 107–124. Weidel, T. A. (2019). Laudato Si, Marx, and a Human Motivation for Addressing Climate Change. Environmental Ethics, 41, 17–36. Weiss, P. A. (2002). Making History of Ideas Classes Relevant: A Writing Strategy. Teaching Philosophy, 25(2), 123–130. Worrall, J. (1989). Structural Realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43(1/2), 99–124. Zahar, E. (1996). Poincare’s Structural Realism and his Logic of Discovery. In Henri Poincaré: Science and Philosophy, eds. J.-L. Greffe, G. Heinzmann & K. Lorenz: 45–68. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Zazkis, R., & Koichu, B. (2015). A Fictional Dialogue on Infinitude of Primes: Introducing Virtual Duoethnography. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88, 163–181.