A definite maybe: Proof and probability in civil commitment

American Psychological Association. Report of the Task Force on the Role of Psychology in the Criminal Justice System.American Psychologist, in press. Cocozza, J., & Steadman, H. The failure of psychiatric predictions of dangerousness: Clear and convincing evidence.Rutgers Law Review, 1976,29, 1048–1101. Dix, G. “Civil” commitment of the mentally ill and the need for data on the prediction of dangerousness.American Behavioral Scientist, 1976,19, 318–34. Kahle, L., & Sales, B. Due process of law and the attitudes of professionals toward involuntary civil commitment. In P. Lipsitt & B. Sales (Eds.),New Directions in Psycholegal Research. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, in press. Kozol, H., Boucher, R., & Garofalo, R. The diagnosis and treatment of dangerousness,Crime and Delinquency, 1972,18, 371–392. Mental Health Law Project. Suggested statute on civil commitment.Mental Disability Law Reporter, 1977,2, 127–159. Monahan, J. Strategies for an empirical analysis of the prediction of violence in emergency civil commitment.Law and Human Behavior. 1977,1, 363–371. Morse, S. Crazy behavior, morals, and science: An analysis of mental health law.Southern California Law Review, 1978,51, 527–654. Shah, S. Dangerousness: A paradigm for exploring some issues in law and psychology.American Psychologist, 1978,33, 224–238. State of Michigan, Department of Corrections. Summary of the parolee risk study. Unpublished report, 1978. Stone, A.Mental Health and the Law: A System in Transition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.