A decision support model for robust allocation and routing of search and rescue resources after earthquake: a case study

Operational Research - Tập 22 - Trang 1039-1081 - 2020
Ghazaleh Ahmadi1, Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam1,2, Armand Baboli3, Mehdi Najafi4
1School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
3LIRIS Laboratory, UMR 5205, CNRS, INSA of Lyon, Villeurbanne Cedex, France
4School of Industrial Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Tóm tắt

The efficient planning of search and rescue (SAR) operations is highly impactful in the disaster response phase, which offers a limited time window with a declining chance for saving trapped people. The present paper introduces a new robust decision support framework for planning SAR resource deployment in post-disaster districts. A two-stage decomposition approach is applied to formulate the problem as iterative interrelated stages of mixed-integer programming (MIP) models. The first stage presents a robust multi-period allocation model for maximizing fair and effective demand coverage in the affected districts during the entire planning horizon. It takes into account the time-sensitiveness of the operations via a time-dependent demand satisfaction measure and incorporates resource transshipment optimization. The second stage optimizes the routing of the resources allocated in the first stage for each district during the upcoming period. It aims to minimize the weighted sum of SAR demand fulfillment times under consideration of secondary destruction risk, resource collaboration, and rest time requirements. At the end of each period, the proposed framework can be re-executed to capture updated resource, demand, and travel time parameters. To tackle the environment’s inherent uncertainty, an interval-based robust optimization approach is adopted. The proposed framework is solved and analyzed for an urban zone in Iran under an earthquake scenario. Results show that the proposed robust models have superior performance compared to a deterministic approach for adaptation to an uncertain disaster environment. More importantly, they prove to be a strong analysis tool for providing helpful managerial insights for the mitigation and preparedness phases.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander D (1996) The health effects of earthquakes in the mid-1990s. Disasters 20(3):231–247 Allaoua H, Borne S, Létocart L, Calvo RW (2013) A matheuristic approach for solving a home health care problem. Electron Notes Discrete Math 41:471–478 Altay N, Green WG III (2006) OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur J Oper Res 175(1):475–493 Ambraseys NN, Melville CP (1977) The seismicity of Kuhistan, Iran. Geogr J 143:179–199 Amini Hosseini K, Hosseini M, Izadkhah Y, Mansouri B, Shaw T (2014) Main challenges on community-based approaches in earthquake risk reduction: case study of Tehran, Iran. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 8:114–124 Ara S (2014) Impact of temporal population distribution on earthquake loss estimation: a case study on Sylhet, Bangladesh. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5:296–312 Asadzadeh A, Kotter T, Zebardast E (2015) An augmented approach for measurement of disaster resilience using connective factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14(4):504–518 Ashtari M, Hatzfeld D, Kamalian N (2005) Microseismicity in the region of Tehran. Tectonophysics 395(3–4):193–208 Attia D, Bürgy R, Desaulniers G, Soumis F (2019) A decomposition-based heuristic for large employee scheduling problems with inter-department transfers. EURO Jo Comput Optim 7(4):325–357 Balcik B, Beamon BM, Krejci CC, Muramatsu KM, Ramirez M (2010) Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges and opportunities. Int J Prod Econ 126(1):22–34 Baron O, Milner J, Naseraldin H (2011) Facility location: a robust optimization approach. Prod Oper Manag 20:772–785 Beamon BM, Balcik B (2008) Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. Management 21(1):4–25 Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1998) Robust convex optimization. Math Oper Res 23:769–805 Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1999) Robust solutions to uncertain programs. Oper Res Lett 25:1–13 Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2000) Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math Program 88:411–424 Ben-Tal A, Ghaoui LE, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52(1):35–53 Bertsimas D, Thiele A (2006) A robust optimization approach to inventory theory. Oper Res 54(1):150–168 Bertsimas D, Brown DB, Caramanis C (2011) Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev 53(3):464–501 Bodaghi B, Palaneeswaran E, Shahparvari S, Mohammadi M (2020) Probabilistic allocation and scheduling of multiple resources for emergency operations; a Victorian bushfire case study. Comput Environ Urban Syst 81:101479 Bozorgi-Amiri A, Jabalameli MS, Al-e-Hashem SM (2013) A multi-objective robust stochastic programming model for disaster relief logistics under uncertainty. OR Spectrum 35(4):905–933 Can A, Ulusoy G (2014) Multi-project scheduling with two-stage decomposition. Ann Oper Res 217(1):95–116 Cao J, Han H, Jiang YP, Wang YJ (2018) Emergency rescue vehicle dispatch planning using a hybrid algorithm. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 17(6):1856–1890 Chen L, Miller-Hooks E (2012) Optimal team deployment in urban search and rescue. Transp Res Part B 46:984–999 Chu X, Zhong QY (2015) Post-earthquake allocation approach of medical rescue teams. Nat Hazards 70(3):1809–1824 Cioca M, Cioca LI (2010) Decision support systems used in disaster management. In: Jao CS (ed) Decision support systems. IntechOpen, London Clemen RT (1996) Making hard decisions: an introduction to decision analysis. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove Dahmen S, Rekik M, Soumis F, Desaulniers G (2020) A two-stage solution approach for personalized multi-department multi-day shift scheduling. Eur J Oper Res 280(3):1051–1063 El-Ghaoui L, Lebret H (1997) Robust solutions to least-square problems to uncertain data matrices. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 18:1035–1064 El-Ghaoui L, Oustry F, Lebret H (1998) Robust solutions to uncertain semi-definite programs. SIAM J Optim 9:33–52 EM-DAT The Emergency events data base. Center for research on epidemiology of disasters (CRED). http://www.emdat.be/ Erbeyoglu G, Bilge U (2020) A robust disaster preparedness model for effective and fair disaster response. Eur J Oper Res 280(2):479–494 Falasca M, Zobel CW, Fetter GM (2009) An optimization model for humanitarian relief volunteer management. In: Proceedings of the 6th international ISCRAM conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 10–13 May 2009 Fiedrich F, Gehbauer F, Rickers U (2000) Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Saf Sci 35:41–57 Freire S, Aubrecht C (2012) Integrating population dynamics into mapping human exposure to seismic hazard. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(11):3533–3543 French S, Geldermann J (2005) The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support. Environ Sci Policy 8(4):378–391 Galindo G, Batta R (2013) Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur J Oper Res 230(2):201–211 Garey MR, Johnson DS (1990) Computers and intractability; a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W.H Freeman, New York Ghajari YE, Alesheikh AA, Modiri M, Hosnavi R, Abbasi M (2017) Spatial modelling of urban physical vulnerability to explosion hazards using GIS and fuzzy MCDA. Sustainability 9(7):1274 Goldschmidt KH, Kumar S (2016) Humanitarian operations and crisis/disaster management: a retrospective review of the literature and framework for development. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 20:1–13 Gralla E, Goentzel J, Fine C (2014) Assessing trade-offs among multiple objectives for humanitarian aid delivery using expert preferences. Prod Oper Manag 23(6):978–989 Hartmann S, Briskorn D (2010) A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 207(1):1–14 Hoyos MC, Morales RS, Akhavan-Tabatabaei R (2015) OR models with stochastic components in disaster operations management: a literature survey. Comput Ind Eng 82:183–197 Hu CL, Liu X, Hua YK (2016) A bi-objective robust model for emergency resource allocation under uncertainty. Int J Prod Res 54(24):7421–7438 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2000) The study on seismic micro-zoning of the greater Tehran area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Main Report Laporte G (2007) What you should know about the vehicle routing problem. Naval Res Logist 54(8):811–819 Lei L, Pinedo M, Qi L, Wang S, Yang J (2015) Personnel scheduling and supplies provisioning in emergency relief operations. Ann Oper Res 235(1):487–515 Lenstra JK, Rinnooy Kan AHG (1981) Complexity of vehicle and scheduling problems. Networks 11:221–227 Liu B, Sheu JB, Zhao X, Chen Y, Zhang W (2020) Decision making on post-disaster rescue routing problems from the rescue efficiency perspective. Eur J Oper Res 286(11):321–335 Memari P, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Navazi F, Jolai F (2020) Air and ground ambulance location-allocation-routing problem for designing a temporary emergency management system after a disaster. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part HJ Eng Med 234(8):812–828 Miller JL, Franz LS (1996) A binary-rounding heuristic for multi-period variable-task-duration assignment problems. Comput Oper Res 33(8):819–828 Misir M, Smet P, Vanden Berghe G (2015) An analysis of generalised heuristics for vehicle routing and personnel rostering problems. J Oper Res Soc 66(5):858–870 Mohamadi A, Yaghoubi S (2017) A bi-objective stochastic model for emergency medical services network design with backup services for disasters under disruptions: an earthquake case study. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 23:204–217 Mohamadi A, Yaghoubi S, Pishvaee MS (2019) Fuzzy multi-objective stochastic programming model for disaster relief logistics considering telecommunication infrastructures: a case study. Oper Res Int J 19(1):59–99 Mojarab M, Mrmarian H, Zare M, Morshedi AH, Pishahan MH (2014) Modeling of the seismotectonic provinces of Iran using the self-organizing map algorithm. Comput Geosci 67:150–162 Mojtahedi M, Lan Oo B (2014) Stakeholders’ approaches to disaster risk reduction in built environment. Disaster Preve Manag 23(4):356–369 Mulvey JM, Vanderbei RJ, Zenios SA (1995) Robust optimization of large scale systems. Oper Res 43:264–281 Najafi M, Eshghi K, Dullaert W (2013) A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase. Transp Res Part E 49:217–249 NGDC/WDS National Geophysical Data Center/World Data Service: Significant Earthquake Database. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA. https://doi.org/10.7289/v5td9v7k Nickel S, Schröder M, Steeg J (2012) Mid-term and short-term planning support for home health care services. Eur J Oper Res 219(3):574–587 Noji EK (1997) The public health consequences of disasters. Oxford University Press, New York OCHA (2015) The International Search and Rescue Advisory Group, INSARAG Guidelines, volume 1: policy. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs https://www.insarag.org/images/stories/INSARAG_Guidelines_V1_Policy1.pdf Olson RS, Olson RA (1987) Urban heavy rescue. Earthq Spectra 3:645–658 Othman SB, Zgaya H, Dotoli M, Hammadi S (2017) An agent-based decision support system for resources’ scheduling in emergency supply chains. Control Eng Pract 59:27–43 Paraskevopoulos DC, Laporte G, Repoussis PP, Tarantilis CD (2017) Resource constrained routing and scheduling: review and research prospects. Eur J Oper Res 263(3):737–754 Population survey, Statistical center of Iran (2011). http://nnt.sci.org.ir/sites/nnt/SitePages/report_90/ostani/ostani_population_report_final_permision.aspx Quarantelli EL (1988) Disaster crisis management: a summary of research findings. J Manag Stud 25(4):373–385 Rauchecker G, Schryen G (2019) An exact branch-and-price algorithm for scheduling rescue units during disaster response. Eur J Oper Res 272(1):352–363 Rolland E, Patterson RA, Ward K, Dodin B (2010) Decision support for disaster management. Oper Manag Res 3(1–2):68–79 Sawik T (2010) An integer programming approach to scheduling in a contaminated area. Omega 38:179–191 Schiffer M, Schneider M, Walther G, Laporte G (2019) Vehicle routing and location routing with intermediate stops: a review. Transp Sci 53(2):319–343 Schmid V, Doerner KF, Laporte G (2013) Rich routing problems arising in supply chain management. Eur J Oper Res 224(3):435–448 Schryen G, Rauchecker G, Comes T (2015) Resource planning in disaster response decision support models and methodologies. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(4):243–259 Shahparvari S, Abbasi B, Chhetri P (2017) Possibilistic scheduling routing for short-notice bush fire emergency evacuation under uncertainties: an Australian case study. Omega 72:96–117 Soyster AL (1973) Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res 21:1154–1157 Statheropoulos M, Agapiou A, Pallis GC, Mikedi K, Karma S, Vamvakarri J, Dandoulaki M, Andritsos F, Paul Thomas CL (2015) Factors that affect rescue time in urban search and rescue (USAR) operations. Nat Hazards 75:57–69 Su Z, Zhang G, Liu Y, Yue F, Jiang J (2016) Multiple emergency resource allocation for concurrent incidents in natural disasters. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 17:199–212 Thompson S, Altay N, Green WG III, Lapetina J (2006) Improving disaster response efforts with decision support systems. Int J Emerg Manag 3(4):250–263 Wex F, Schryen G, Feuerriegel S, Neumann D (2013) Emergency response in natural disaster management: allocation and scheduling of rescue units. Eur J Oper Res 235(3):697–708 Xiang Y, Zhuang J (2016) A medical resource allocation model for serving emergency victims with deteriorating health conditions. Ann Oper Res 236:177–196 Yalçındağ S, Matta A (2017) A decomposition approach for the home health care problem with time windows. In: Cappanera P, Li J, Matta A, Sahin E, Vandaele N, Visintin F (eds) International Conference Health Care Systems Engineering (ICHCSE), Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol. 210, pp 221–232 Yalçındağ S, Cappanera P, Scutella MG, Şahin E, Matta A (2016) Pattern-based decompositions for human resource planning in home health care services. Comput Oper Res 73:12–26 Yan L, Jinsong B, Xiaofeng H, Ye J (2009) A heuristic project scheduling approach for quick response to maritime disaster rescue. Int J Project Manag 27(6):620–628 Yan S, Lin CK, Chen SY (2014) Logistical support scheduling under stochastic travel times given an emergency repair work schedule. Comput Ind Eng 67:20–35 Zhang ZH, Jiang H (2014) A robust counterpart approach to the bi-objective emergency medical service design problem. Appl Math Model 38:1033–1040 Zhang JH, Li J, Liu ZP (2012) Multiple-resource and multiple-depot emergency response problem considering secondary disasters. Expert Syst Appl 39:11066–11071 Zhang C, Liu X, Jiang YP, Fan B, Song X (2016) A two-stage resource allocation model for lifeline systems quick response with vulnerability analysis. Eur J Oper Res 250(3):855–864 Zheng YJ, Ling HF, Xue JY (2018) Disaster rescue task scheduling: an evolutionary multi-objective optimization approach. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput 6(2):288–300 Zokaee S, Bozorgi-Amiri A, Sadjadi SJ (2016) A robust optimization model for humanitarian relief chain design under uncertainty. Appl Math Model 40:7996–8016