A computer‐aided approach to material selection and environmental auditing
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this paper is to provide an environmental‐oriented material selection methodology with two distinct features: it uses a computer‐aided material selector coupled with environmental auditing; and it provides a quantitative analysis of environmental impact of selected material.
A two‐phase computer‐aided procedure that considers material properties, manufacturing constraints, and design and economic requirements is introduced with the objective of finding the material with least negative environmental impact. The procedure is illustrated for an industrial component.
The implementation of the proposed procedure resulted in screening of three feasible materials from a database of 2,900 materials, among which cast aluminum exhibits savings in energy consumption and CO2 emission. This result shows the effectiveness of using a systematic computer‐aided method for a speedy selection of material and generating quantitative data to measure the environmental performances and assess the product life cycle.
Although the use of digital databases and material selectors can increase the searching speed and efficiency, the user's knowledge is still needed to achieve the maximum benefits.
Consideration of eco‐sustainability factors in product development may require handling an overwhelming amount of data and performing a good many calculations. The literature review also indicates the difficulty of incorporating quantitative data into environmental and life cycle assessments of a product. As a first step to overcome such challenges, the paper presents a practicalcomputer‐aided procedure that can assist product mangers or designers in quickly and efficiently incorporating environmental and sustainability considerations into their business decision making.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ashby, M.F., Ball, N. and Bream, C. (2008), The CES EduPack Eco Audit Tool, Granta Design, Cambridge.
Ashby, M.F., Brechet, Y.J.M., Cebon, D. and Salvo, L. (2004), “Selection strategies for materials and process”, Materials & Design, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 51‐67.
Djassemi, M. (2009), “Computer‐based approach to material and process selection”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 975‐88.
EcoLife Thematic Network (2002), Environmentally Improved Product Design: Case Studies of European of Electrical and Electronics Industry, available at: www.sph.umich.edu/riskcenter/jolliet/Ferrendier%202002.pdf (accessed 18 January 2010).
Ermolaeva, N.S., Castro, M.B.G. and Kandachar, P.V. (2004), “Materials selection for an automotive structure by integrating structural optimization with environmental impact assessment”, Materials & Design, Vol. 25 No. 8, pp. 689‐98.
Fiksel, J. (2006), “A framework for sustainable materials management”, Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Vol. 58 No. 8, pp. 15‐22.
Giudice, F., La Rosa, G. and Risitano, A. (2005), “Materials selection in the life‐cycle design process: a method to integrate mechanical and environmental performances in optimal choice”, Materials & Design, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 9‐20.
Jalham, I.S. (2006), “Decision‐making integrated information technology (IIT) approach for material selection”, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 65‐71.
Lin, F. and Lin, L. (2003), “A discussion of the state of art research on environmentally conscious material selection methodologies for the reduction of product's toxic impact”, The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, Vol. 3 Nos 3/4, pp. 119‐34.
Pearce, A.R., Hastak, M. and Vanegas, J.A. (1995), “A decision support system for construction materials selection using sustainability as a criterion”, Proceedings of the NCSBCS Conference on Building Codes and Standards, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Raman, A. (2007), Materials Selection and Applications in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial Press, New York, NY.
Ribeiro, I., Pecas, P., Silva, A. and Henriques, E. (2008), “Life cycle engineering methodology applied to material selection, a fender case study”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16 No. 17, pp. 1887‐99.
Sapuan, S.M. (2001), “A knowledge‐based system for materials selection in mechanical engineering design”, Materials & Design, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 687‐95.
Sapuan, S.M., Jacob, M.S.D., Mustapha, F. and Ismail, N. (2002), “A prototype knowledge‐based system for material selection of ceramic matrix composites of automotive engine components”, Materials & Design, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 701‐8.
Shanian, A. and Savadogo, O. (2006), “A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making”, Materials and Design, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 329‐37.
Stuart, J.A. and Sommerville, R.M. (1998), “Materials selection for life cycle design”, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Oak Brook, IL, USA, pp. 151‐8.
United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), “Our common future”, available at: www.worldinbalance.net/agreements/1987‐brundtland.php (accessed 25 January 2010).
Waage, S.A. (2007), “Re‐considering product design: a practical ‘road‐map’ for integration of sustainability issues”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15 No. 7, pp. 638‐49.
Waterman, N.A. and Ashby, M.F. (1991), Material Selector, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.