A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list

Abramo, 2012, Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2206, 10.1002/asi.22647 Abramo, 2017, Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science?, Scientometrics, 111, 317, 10.1007/s11192-017-2253-x Abramo, 2017, Specialization vs diversification in research activities: the extent, intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists, Scientometrics, 112, 1403, 10.1007/s11192-017-2426-7 Abramo, 2017, The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification, Scientometrics, 114, 373, 10.1007/s11192-017-2529-1 Adams, 2007, Bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinary research Adams, 2016, Interdisciplinary research: Methodologies for identification and assessment Archambault, 2011, Towards a multilingual, comprehensive and open scientific journal ontology, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 66 Banal-Estanol, 2018 Börner, 2012, Design and update of a classification system: The UCSD map of science, PloS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0039464 Bunderson, 2002, Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects, The Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875 Choi, 2006, Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness, Clinical and Investigative Medicine Medecine Clinique et Experimentale, 29, 351 Committee on the Science of Team Science; Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council; Cooke NJ, Hilton ML, editors. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015 Jul 15. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK310387/ 10.17226/19007 D’Angelo, 2010, A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in large-scale bibliometric databases, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 257, 10.1002/asi.21460 Glänzel, 2003, A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes, Scientometrics, 56, 357, 10.1023/A:1022378804087 Huutoniemi, 2010, Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators, Research Policy, 39, 79, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011 Jacobs, 2009, Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment, Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 43, 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115954 Klavans, 2017, Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 984, 10.1002/asi.23734 Klein, 2008, Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. A literature review, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S116, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010 Kuhn, 1970 Leahey, 2017, Prominent but less productive, Administrative Science Quarterly, 62, 105, 10.1177/0001839216665364 Levitt, 2008, Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1973, 10.1002/asi.20914 Morillo, 2001, An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 51, 203, 10.1023/A:1010529114941 Morillo, 2003, Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 10.1002/asi.10326 Mugabushaka, 2016, Bibliometric indicators of interdisciplinarity: The potential of the Leinster–Cobbold diversity indices to study disciplinary diversity, Scientometrics, 107, 593, 10.1007/s11192-016-1865-x NAS/NAE/IOM, 2005 National Science Board, 2016 Nijssen, 1998, The Lorenz curve: A graphical representation of evenness, Coenoses, 13, 33 OECD, Interdisciplinarity in science and technology. Paris: OECD Directorate for science, technology and industry, 1998. Palmer, 1999, Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 50, 242 Perianes-Rodriguez, 2017, A comparison of the Web of Science and publication-level classification systems of science, Journal of Informetrics, 11, 32, 10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.007 Porter, 2009, Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time, Scientometrics, 81, 719, 10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2 Porter, 2007, Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity, Scientometrics, 72, 117, 10.1007/s11192-007-1700-5 Porter, 2008, How interdisciplinary is a given body of research?, Research Evaluation, 17, 273, 10.3152/095820208X364553 Qin, 1997, Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 893, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X Rafols, 2010, Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience, Scientometrics, 82, 263, 10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y Rao, 1982, Diversity: Its measurement, decomposition, apportionment and analysis, Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 44, 1 Rijnsoever, 2011, Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration, Research Policy, 40, 463, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001 Rinia, 2002, Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics, Scientometrics, 53, 241, 10.1023/A:1014856625623 Rousseau, 2018, Knowledge integration: Its meaning and measurement Ruiz-Castillo, 2015, Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science, Journal of Informetrics, 9, 102, 10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.010 Sanz-Menéndez, 2001, Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: Its measure in three different research areas, Research Evaluation, 10, 47, 10.3152/147154401781777123 Schummer, 2004, Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 59, 425, 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38 Stirling, 1994, Diversity and ignorance in electricity supply investment, Energy Policy, 22, 195, 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90159-7 Stirling, 2007, A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society, Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 4, 707, 10.1098/rsif.2007.0213 Stokols, 2003, Evaluating transdisciplinary science, Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 5, 21, 10.1080/14622200310001625555 Wagner, 2011, Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature, Journal of Informetrics, 5, 14, 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004 Waltman, 2012, A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2378, 10.1002/asi.22748 Wang, 2015, Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity, PloS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0127298 Zhang, 2012, Proceeding papers in journals versus the regular journal publications, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 88, 10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.007 Zhang, 2016, Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 1257, 10.1002/asi.23487 Zhang, 2018, Interdisciplinarity and collaboration: On the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists, Scientometrics, 10.1007/s11192-018-2853-0