A comparison of some of the pharmacokinetic parameters of three commercial sulphadiazine/trimethoprim combined preparations given orally to pigs

Veterinary Research Communications - Tập 14 - Trang 403-410 - 1990
N. E. Søli1,2,3,4, T. Framstad1,2,3,4, E. Skjerve1,2,3,4, S. Sohlberg1,2,3,4, S. A. Ødegaard1,2,3,4
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo 1, Norway
2Department of Physiology and Nutrition, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo 1, Norway
3Department of Food Hygiene, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo 1, Norway
4Department of Reproduction and Forensic Medicine, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo 1, Norway

Tóm tắt

Three sulphadiazine/trimethoprim preparations were administered orally during feeding to pigs. Six male and six female pigs were used. Clinically important pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs in the three preparations were determined and compared. The plasma concentrations of sulphadiazine and trimethoprim increased rapidly in the pigs followed by a quite rapid decrease from 4 to 12 h after oral administration. The mean values of the absorption half-lives of sulphadiazine and trimethoprim were 0.9–1.6 h and 0.5–0.8 h, respectively. The corresponding values for the elimination half-lives of sulphadiazine and trimethoprim were 3.1–4.3 h and 3.4–6.0 h, respectively. There were no significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two compounds in the three preparations with the exception of Tmax for sulphadiazine and t1/2β for trimethoprim. Comparative bioavailability calculations showed no statistically significant differences between sulphadiazine and trimethoprim in the three preparations. The weight increase of the pigs during the experimental period (mean = 37.3–64.9 kg) did not cause differences in the kinetics of the two drugs which could have consequences for the use of the three combined preparations in clinical practice. No unacceptable or antibacterial residues of sulphadiazine or trimethoprim were found in the kidneys of pigs slaughtered at 5, 7 and 10 days after administration.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Framstad, T., Sjaastad, Ø. and Aass, R.A., 1988. Blodprøvetaking på gris. Norsk Veterinœrtidsskrift, 100, 265–272 Friis, C., Gyrd-Hansen, N., Nielsen, P., Nordholm, L. and Rasmussen, F., 1984a. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of trimethoprim in neonatal and young pigs. Pediatric Pharmacology, 4, 231–238 Friis, C., Gyrd-Hansen, N., Nielsen, P., Olsen, C-E. and Rasmussen, F., 1984b. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of sulphadiazine in neonatal and young pigs. Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica, 54, 321–326 Lu, G.Z., 1986. Pharmacokinetic studies on sulfadoxine and a sulfadoxine-trimethoprim combination in swine. Pig News and Information, 7, 517, abstr. 2807 Luther, H.G., 1979. The pharmacokinetics of sulfadiazine in cattle, sheep and swine. Dissertation Abstracts International B, 39, 5789–5790 Nielsen, P. and Rasmussen, F., 1975a. Half-life and renal excretion of trimethoprim in swine. Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica, 36, 123–131 Nielsen, P. and Rasmussen, F., 1975b. Trimethoprim and sulphadiazine in swine. Half-lives, volume of distribution and tissue concentrations. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reiche A, 22, 564–571