A comparison of nanoparticle and fine particle uptake by Daphnia magna

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry - Tập 28 Số 10 - Trang 2142-2149 - 2009
Philipp Rosenkranz1, Qasim Chaudhry2, Vicki Stone1, Teresa F. Fernandes1
1School of Life Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh, EH10 5DT Scotland, United Kingdom
2Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, United Kingdom

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe use of nanoparticles in various applications is steadily on the rise, with use in a range of applications, including printer toner, sunscreen, medical imaging, and enhanced drug delivery. While research on human effects via, for example, inhalation is relatively well developed, the environmental assessment of nanoparticles is in its infancy. In the present study, we assessed the uptake and quantitative accumulation, as well as the depuration, of a model nanoparticle, a 20‐nm fluorescent carboxylated polystyrene bead, in the aquatic invertebrate Daphnia magna and compared it to a larger, 1,000‐nm particle. Using confocal microscopy, rapid accumulation in the gastrointestinal tract was observed within an hour of exposure to both particle sizes in both adults and neonates. Fluorescence could also be observed in the oil storage droplets, suggesting that both particle sizes have crossed the gut's epithelial barrier. Quantification of fluorescence of both sizes of particles showed that although uptake of the 20‐nm particles was lower in terms of mass it was equal to or greater than 1,000‐nm particle uptake when expressed as surface area or particle number. Depuration was relatively rapid for the 1,000‐nm beads, decreasing by more than 90% over 4 h. In contrast, depuration of the 20‐nm beads was less extensive, reaching 40% over 4 h. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed uptake of 1,000‐nm beads, but uptake of 20‐nm beads was inconclusive since similar‐sized inclusions could be observed in control treatments.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, 2007, The existing and proposed definitions relating to products of nanotechnologies, 29 November

10.3109/9781420045154-22

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.078

10.1021/nl0489586

10.1006/taap.2002.9501

10.1006/taap.2001.9240

10.1289/ehp.8871

10.1002/ijc.20064

10.1186/1477-3155-2-12

10.1186/1743-8977-3-11

10.1289/ehp.7339

10.1007/s00441-002-0647-3

10.1080/00984100290071658

10.1080/08958370490439597

Lovern SB, 2006, Daphnia magna, 25, 1132

10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.02.003

10.1021/es062572a

10.4319/lo.1968.13.4.0675

10.1007/BF00347591

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.2002.Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms. EPA 821/R‐02/012.Washington DC.

10.1007/BF00028392

Bednarska A, 2006, Adaptive changes in morphology of Daphnia filter appendages in response to food stress, Polish Journal of Ecology, 54, 663

Gerritsen J, 1988, Not by sieving alone: Observations of suspension feeding inDaphnia, Bull Mar Sci, 43, 366

Gillis PL, 2005, Daphnia, 71, 143

10.1242/jeb.009175

Lotocka M, 2001, Toxic effect of cyanobacterial blooms on the grazing activity of Daphnia magna Straus, Oceanologia, 43, 441

10.1016/0166-445X(90)90015-H

10.1073/pnas.77.3.1716

10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.014

10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00903.x

10.1289/ehp.9209

10.1021/ac001472z

10.1073/pnas.0501950102

10.1007/s10126-002-0105-y

10.1002/jemt.10284

10.1080/17435390801935960

BoxallABA ChaudhryQ SinclairC JonesA AitkenR JeffersonB WattsC.2007.Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Final Report. Department of the Environment and Rural Affairs Sand Hutton York UK.

JonerEJ HartnikT AmundsenCE.2008.Environmental fate and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles. Final Report. TA 2304/2007. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority Bioforsk Ås Norway.

10.1093/icb/8.3.529

10.1093/annhyg/46.suppl_1.242