A comparison of existing transformation models to improve coordinate conversion between geodetic reference frames in Nigeria
Tóm tắt
Efficient transformation parameters are key to effective geodetic operations between any systems. With the advancement in technology, an improved interaction between geodetic reference frames has been noticed irrespective of their inherent heterogeneous deformations and the intermittently present oversight that exist as a result of the conversion methodology. The spatial data captured using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) have a reference datum based on the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) ellipsoid. These data usually require a transformation to a local projection with its ellipsoid and datum and vice versa. These geodetic operations are unavoidably vulnerable to data loss due to distortion, especially if the applied model is unsuitable for the transformation between reference frames. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to authenticate the existing set of parameters for the local and geocentric systems in Nigeria by assessing the efficacy of the Bursa Wolf (BW) and the Molodensky Badekas (MB) models. To this end, both models (BW and MB) are compared in this study and used in the development of the Helmerts seven transformation parameters between Minna datum (Clarke 1880) and WGS84 reference ellipsoids for a large region in Southern Nigeria. Results show that the sets of datum shift transformation parameters for both models (a scale factor with three sets of translational and rotational parameters), derived from the exercise of the BW and the MB models revealed a high degree of correlation between the expected and derived set of coordinates during the validation/testing phase using each set of models. The validation exercise was carried out on a total of seven points, which were not part of the original computations. These points were distributed across the region to provide a better framework and a higher confidence level. Overall, an improvement of 68% is observed in terms of the correlation between expected and derived coordinates in the validation points and from the obtained root mean square values. Ultimately, the MB model is preferred to the BW model evidently because the transformation involves a global–local reference frame.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anupam S, Pani P (2020) Flood forecasting using a hybrid extreme learning machine-particle swarm optimization algorithm (ELM-PSO) model. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:341–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00682-z
Ayer J, Tiennah T (2008) datum transformation by the iterative solution of the abridging inverse molodensky formulae. Ghana Surv 1(2):59–66
Blick G (2004) Reference frames in practice manual. International Federation of Surveyors. https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub64/Figpub64.pdf Accessed 10 Jan 2020
Dawod GM, Mirza NM, Al-Ghamdi AK (2010) TS 8 Simple Precise Coordinates Transformations for Geomatics Applications in Makkah Metropolitan Area, Saudi-Arabia. Bridging the Gap between Cultures FIG Working Week, Marrakech, Morocco, 18–22
Deakin R (2006) A note on the bursa-wolf and molodensky-badekas transformations. http://www.mygeodesy.id.au/documents/Similarity%20Transforms.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2020
Devi S, Mishra RP (2020) A mathematical model to see the effects of increasing environmental temperature on plant–pollinator interactions. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:1315–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00763-4
DMA (1987) Department of defence world geodetic system 1984: its definition and relationship with local geodetic systems (2nd edn). Defence Mapping Agency, Washington. Technical Report no.8350.2
Dzidefo A (2011) Determination of Transformation Parameters between the World Geodetic System 1984 and the Ghana Geodetic Network. Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil and Geomatic Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Featherstone WE (1997) A comparison of existing coordinate transformation models and parameters in Australia. Cartography 26(1):13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.1997.9714042
Featherstone WE, Galloway D, Goulding P, Reit BG (1999) Transformation between Australian datums using a modified transverse Mercator projection. Cartography 28(1):19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.1999.9714297
Fubara JMD (1995) Determination of 7-parameters datum transformation for Shell Petroleum Development Company; for use in the Southern Nigeria. Geodetic Surveys Nigeria
Gin C, Lusch B, Brunton B, Kutz J (2020) Deep learning models for global coordinate transformations that linearise PDEs. Eur J Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792520000327
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco
ICSM (2014) Geocentric datum of Australia technical manual, version 2.4. Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping. www.icsm.gov.au/icsm/gda/gdatm/index.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2020
Janssen V (2009) Understanding coordinate systems, datums and transformations in Australia. In: Ostendorf B, Baldock P, Bruce D, Burdett M, Corcoran P (eds) Proceedings of the Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial International Conference, Adelaide 2009, Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute, pp 697–715. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228649896_Understanding_coordinate_systems_datums_and_mations_in_Australia Accessed 10 Jan 2020
Kinneen RW, Featherstone WE (2004) An empirical comparison of coordinate transformations from the Australian geodetic datum (AGD66 and AGD84) to the geocentric datum of Australia (GDA94). J Spat Sci 49(2):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2004.9635019
Krakiwsky EJ, Thomson DB (1974) Mathematical models for the combination of terrestrial and satellite networks. Canad Surv 28(5):606–615. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcs-1974-0105
Kutoglu HS, Mekik C, Akcin H (2002) A comparison of two well known models for 7-parameter transformation. Aust Surv 47(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050356.2002.10558839
Marzooqi AY, Fashir H, Ahmed SI (2005) Derivation of datum transformation parameters for dubai emirate from Pharohs to geoinformatics. FIG. FIG Working Week and GSDI-8 Cairo, Egypt April 15–21
Mogaji KA, Lim HS (2020) A GIS-based linear regression modeling approach to assess the impact of geologic rock types on groundwater recharge and its hydrological implication. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00670-3
Ndehedehe CE, Ferreira VG (2020) Assessing land water storage dynamics over South America. J Hydrol 580:124339
Newsome GG, Harvey BR (2003) GPS coordinate transformationparameters for Jamaica. Surv Rev 37(289):218–234. https://doi.org/10.1179/sre.2003.37.289.218
NIMA (2004) Department of defense world geodetic system 1984: Its definition and relationships with local geodetic systems, technical report 8350.2. http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/publications/tr8350.2/tr8350_2.html Accessed 10 Jan 2020
Okeke F (2013) Coordinate transformation parameters and procedure for Nigeria. Final Workshop on the Adoption of Transformation Parameters for Nigeria held on 2–3 July 2013, Abuja
Seeber G (2003) Satellite geodesy, (2nd edn) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, p 589
Tierra A, Dalazoana R, Freitas SD (2008) Using an artificial neural network to improve the transformation of coordinates between classical geodetic reference frames. Comput Geosci 34(3):181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.03.011
Vanicek P, Krakiwsky E (1986) Geodesy: the concepts, 2nd edn. North Holland, Amsterdam
Ziggah YY, Youjian H, Amans C, Fan D (2013) Determination of GPS coordinate transformation parameters of geodetic data between reference datums—a case. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol 2:956
Ziggah YY, Youjian H, Tierra AR, Laari PB (2019a) Coordinate transformation between global and local data based on artificial neural network with K-Fold cross-validation in Ghana. Earth Sci Res J 23(1):67–77. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v23n1.63860
Ziggah YY, Hu Y, Issaka Y, Laari PB (2019b) Least squares support vector machine model for coordinate transformation. Geod Cartogry 45(1):1627. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2019.6053