A comparison of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods to characterize nanoparticle size distributions

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 10 - Trang 89-96 - 2008
Christopher M. Hoo1, Natasha Starostin2,3, Paul West2, Martha L. Mecartney1
1Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
2Technology Center, Pacific Nanotechnology, Inc., Irvine, USA
3Rosemount Analytical Inc., Irvine, USA

Tóm tắt

This paper compares the accuracy of conventional dynamic light scattering (DLS) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) for characterizing size distributions of polystyrene nanoparticles in the size range of 20–100 nm. Average DLS values for monosize dispersed particles are slightly higher than the nominal values whereas AFM values were slightly lower than nominal values. Bimodal distributions were easily identified with AFM, but DLS results were skewed toward larger particles. AFM characterization of nanoparticles using automated analysis software provides an accurate and rapid analysis for nanoparticle characterization and has advantages over DLS for non-monodispersed solutions.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C (1986) Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 56:930–934 Bryant G, Thomas J (1995) Improved particle size distribution measurements using multiangle dynamic light scattering. Langmuir 11:2480–2482 Cadene A, Durand-Vidal S, Turq P, Brendle J (2005) Study of individual Na-montmorillonite particles size, morphology, and apparent charge. J Colloid Interface Sci 285:719–730 Cao A (2003) Light scattering. Recent applications. Anal Lett 36:3185–3225 Dick K, Dhanasekaran T, Zhang Z, Meisel D (2001) Size-dependent melting of silica-encapsulated gold nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 124:2312–2317 Elizalde O, Leal GP, Leiza JR (2000) Particle size distribution measurements of polymeric dispersions: a comparative study. Part Part Syst Charact 17:236–243 Finsy R, De Jaeger N, Sneyers R, Gelade E (1992) Particle sizing by photon correlation spectroscopy. Part III: mono and bimodal distributions and data analysis. Part Part Syst Charact 9:125–137 Flamberg A, Pecora R (1984) Dynamic light scattering study of micelles in a high ionic strength solution. J Phys Chem 88:3026–3033 Juillerat F, Solak HH, Bowen P, Hofmann H (2005) Fabrication of large-area ordered arrays of nanoparticles on patterned substrates. Nanotechnology 16:1311–1316 Leung AB, Suh KI, Ansari RR (2006) Particle-size and velocity measurements in flowing conditions using dynamic light scattering. Appl Opt 45:2186–2190 Li Y, Lindsay SM (1991) Polystyrene latex particles as a size calibration for the atomic force microscope. Rev Sci Instrum 62:2630–2633 Liu FK, Chang YC, Ko FH, Chu TC, Dai BT (2003) Rapid fabrication of high quality self–assembled nanometer gold nanoparticles by spin coating method. Microelectron Eng 67–68:702–709 Meulenkamp EA (1998) Size dependence of the dissolution of ZnO nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 102:7764–7769 Provder T (1997) Challenges in particle size distribution measurement past, present and for the 21st century. Prog Org Coat 32:143–153 Villarrubia JS (1997) Algorithms for scanned probe microscope image simulation, surface reconstruction and tip estimation. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 102:425–454 Xia D, Biswas A, Li D, Bruek S (2004) Directed self-assembly of silica nanoparticles into nanometer-scale patterned surfaces using spin coating. Adv Mater 16:1427–1432